csefh - Kinder-Umwelt-Gesundheit

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook Chapter 11 - Intake of Meats, Dairy Products and Fats Table 11-2. Confidence in Recommendations for Intake of Meats, Diary Products, and Fats General Assessment Factors Rationale Rating Soundness High Adequacy of Approach The survey methodology and data analysis was adequate. The survey sampled approximately 11,000 children. An analysis of primary data was conducted. Minimal (or Defined) Bias Applicability and Utility Exposure Factor of Interest Representativeness Currency Data Collection Period Clarity and Completeness Accessibility Reproducibility Quality Assurance Variability and Uncertainty Variability in Population Uncertainty No physical measurements were taken. The method relied on recent recall of meats and diary products eaten. The key studies were directly relevant to meat, dairy, and fat intake. The data were demographically representative of the U.S. population (based on stratified random sample). Data were collected between 1994 and 1998. Data were collected for two non-consecutive days. The CSFII data are publicly available. The methodology used was clearly described; enough information was included to reproduce the results. Quality assurance of the CSFII data was good; quality control of the secondary data analysis was not well described. Full distributions were provided for total meats, total diary products, and total fats. Means were provided for individuals meats and diary products. Data collection was based on recall of consumption for a 2-day period; the accuracy of using these data to estimate long-term intake (especially at the upper percentiles) is uncertain. However, use of short-term data to estimate chronic ingestion can be assumed for broad categories of foods such as total meats, total diary products, and total fats. Uncertainty is likely to be greater for individual meats and diary products. Medium High Medium Page Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook 11-4 September 2008
Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook Chapter 11 - Intake of Meats, Dairy Products and Fats Table 11-2. Confidence in Recommendations for Intake of Meats, Diary Products, and Fats (continued) General Assessment Factors Rationale Rating Evaluation and Review Medium Peer Review The USDA CSFII survey received a high level of peer review. The U.S. EPA analysis of these data has not been peer reviewed outside the Agency. Number and Agreement of Studies There was 1 key study for intake of meat and diary products and 1 key for fat intake. Both were based on the 1994-96, 1998 CSFII. Overall Rating High confidence in the averages; Low confidence in the long-term upper percentiles Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook Page September 2008 11-5
Page 1 and 2:
National Center for Environmental A
Page 3 and 4:
CSEFH TABLE OF CONTENTS Child-Speci
Page 5 and 6:
CSEFH 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continue
Page 7 and 8:
CSEFH TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page 9 and 10:
CSEFH TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page 11 and 12:
CSEFH 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continu
Page 13 and 14:
CSEFH LIST OF TABLES Child-Specific
Page 15 and 16:
CSEFH LIST OF TABLES (Continued) Ch
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
CSEFH ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Ch
Page 31 and 32:
CSEFH OPP = Office of Pesticide Pro
Page 33 and 34:
CSEFH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Child-
Page 35 and 36:
CSEFH were discussed in the guideli
Page 37 and 38:
CSEFH Table ES-1. Summary of Recomm
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
CSEFH Youngmoo Kim, U.S. EPA, Regio
Page 47 and 48:
Child-Specific Exposure Factors Han
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
exposure assessor) to distinguish b
Page 75 and 76:
is perhaps the most common method o
Page 77 and 78:
uncertainty is high, a sensitivity
Page 79 and 80:
Peretz, C.; Goldberg, P.; Kahan, E.
Page 81 and 82:
Table 2-3. Approaches to Quantitati
Page 83 and 84:
water ingestion is summarized. Rele
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
3.3 DRINKING WATER INGESTION STUDIE
Page 89 and 90:
that the three-day diary has been s
Page 91 and 92:
million. In addition, whites were u
Page 93 and 94:
an indicator of pool water ingestio
Page 95 and 96:
Table 3-4. Per Capita a Estimates o
Page 97 and 98:
Table 3-8. Per Capitaa Estimates of
Page 99 and 100:
Table 3-11. Per Capita a Estimates
Page 101 and 102:
Table 3-14. Consumers Onlya Estimat
Page 103 and 104:
Table 3-18. Consumers Onlya Estimat
Page 105 and 106:
Table 3-21. Consumers Only a Estima
Page 107 and 108:
Water Ingested (mL/day) a from Wate
Page 109 and 110:
Table 3-26. Plain Tap Water and Tot
Page 111 and 112:
Total fluid Plain water Milk Carbon
Page 113 and 114:
Tap Water Intake in Breastfed and F
Page 115 and 116:
Table 3-32. Mean (± Standard Devia
Page 117 and 118:
Study Group Table 3-34. Pool Water
Page 119 and 120:
of specific mouthing events, expres
Page 121 and 122:
Table 4-2. Confidence in Recommenda
Page 123 and 124:
their children’s mouthing behavio
Page 125 and 126:
to mouth activity was recorded duri
Page 127 and 128:
contacts occurring during the objec
Page 129 and 130:
unlikely to be representative of th
Page 131 and 132:
2 to 3 days old, in a quiet, temper
Page 133 and 134:
waking hours. Parents also recorded
Page 135 and 136:
outdoor mouthing rates. The authors
Page 137 and 138:
Activity Data of Two- to Four-Year-
Page 139 and 140:
Table 4-6. Variability in Objects M
Page 141 and 142:
Behavior Child-Specific Exposure Fa
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Table 4-17. Estimated Mean Daily Mo
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Age Group Birth to
Page 279 and 280:
8.3 KEY BODY WEIGHT STUDY 8.3.1 U.S
Page 281 and 282:
III (1966-70) for ages 12-17 years,
Page 283 and 284:
8.4.9 Kahn and Stralka, 2008 - Esti
Page 285 and 286:
Table 8-3. Mean and Percentile Body
Page 287 and 288:
Page Child-Specific Exposure Factor
Page 289 and 290:
Table 8-8. Statistics for Probabili
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Figure 8-2. Weight by Age Percentil
Page 297 and 298:
Figure 8-4. Weight by Length Percen
Page 299 and 300:
Figure 8-6. Body Mass Index-for-Age
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Age Group a Child-Specific Exposure
Page 309 and 310:
Age Group a Child-Specific Exposure
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Source: Gestational Age (weeks) 25
Page 315 and 316:
of the food consumed after the mois
Page 317 and 318:
Minimal (or Defined) Bias Child-Spe
Page 319 and 320:
9.3 INTAKE STUDIES The primary sour
Page 321 and 322:
9.3.2 Relevant Fruit and Vegetable
Page 323 and 324:
Weighted data were used in all of t
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page Child-Specifi c Exposur e Fact
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Vegetables Any Vegetable Baby Food
Page 347 and 348:
4 to 5 months 6 to 11 months 12 to
Page 349 and 350:
All fruits Canned fruit Fresh fruit
Page 351 and 352:
Table 9-23. Mean Moisture Content o
Page 353 and 354: Child-Specific Exposure Factors Han
Page 363 and 364: eported on fish intake for children
Page 365 and 366: a Table 10-1. Recommended Values fo
Page 367 and 368: 10.3 GENERAL POPULATION STUDIES 10.
Page 369 and 370: Minnesota, and North Dakota. While
Page 371 and 372: elow the value of 8 ounces most com
Page 373 and 374: into a single pooled data set is so
Page 375 and 376: as described in Section 10.6.1.2, a
Page 377 and 378: Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Co
Page 383 and 384: Table 10-12. Fish Consumption Among
Page 387 and 388: Table 10-18. Mean Fish Intake Among
Page 391 and 392: Table 10-23. Consumption Rates for
Page 393 and 394: Species a Anadromous fish Pelagic f
Page 397 and 398: Lingcod Mackerel, Atlantic Mackerel
Page 403: Child-Specific Exposure Factors Han
Page 421 and 422: Child-Specific Exposur e Factor s H
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Total Grains 95000060 15000250 1500
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
Page 481 and 482:
Page 483 and 484:
Page 485 and 486:
Page 487 and 488:
Page 489 and 490:
Page 491 and 492:
Page 493 and 494:
Page 495 and 496:
Page 497 and 498:
Page 499 and 500:
Page 501 and 502:
Page 503 and 504:
Page 505 and 506:
Page 507 and 508:
Page 509 and 510:
Page 511 and 512:
Page 513 and 514:
Page 515 and 516:
Page 517 and 518:
Page 519 and 520:
Page 521 and 522:
Page 523 and 524:
Page 525 and 526:
Page 527 and 528:
Page 529 and 530:
Page 531 and 532:
Page 533 and 534:
Page 535 and 536:
Page 537 and 538:
Page 539 and 540:
Page 541 and 542:
Page 543 and 544:
Page 545 and 546:
Page 547 and 548:
Page 549 and 550:
Page 551 and 552:
Page 553 and 554:
Page 555 and 556:
Page 557 and 558:
Page 559 and 560:
Page 561 and 562:
Page 563 and 564:
Page 565 and 566:
Page 567 and 568:
Page 569 and 570:
Page 571 and 572:
Page 573 and 574:
Page 575 and 576:
Page 577 and 578:
Page 579 and 580:
Page 581 and 582:
Page 583 and 584:
Page 585 and 586:
Page 587 and 588:
Page 589 and 590:
Page 591 and 592:
Page 593 and 594:
Page 595 and 596:
Page 597 and 598:
Page 599 and 600:
Page 601 and 602:
Page 603 and 604:
Page 605 and 606:
Page 607 and 608:
Page 609 and 610:
Page 611 and 612:
Page 613 and 614:
Page 615 and 616:
Page 617 and 618:
Page 619 and 620:
Page 621 and 622:
Page 623 and 624:
Page 625 and 626:
Page 627 and 628:
Page 629 and 630:
Page 631 and 632:
Page 633 and 634:
Page 635 and 636:
Page 637 and 638:
Page 639 and 640:
Page 641 and 642:
Page 643 and 644:
Page 645 and 646:
Page 647 and 648:
Page 649 and 650:
Page 651 and 652:
Page 653 and 654:
Page 655 and 656:
Page 657 and 658:
Page 659 and 660:
Page 661 and 662:
Page 663 and 664:
Page 665 and 666:
Page 667 and 668:
Page 669 and 670:
Page 671 and 672:
Page 673 and 674:
Page 675 and 676:
Page 677 and 678:
Page 679:
National Center for Environmental A
show all

csefh - Kinder-Umwelt-Gesundheit

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?