UC Los Angeles Campus & Medical Center Strategic Energy Plan ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The potential cost and savings for this measure is based on the planned construction for the campuses, as detailed in the 2007-08 to 2011-12 Capital Program document from the UCOP website. This includes construction and renovation projects on all campuses, independent of building funding source. The total project cost and savings were projected for individual projects, based on average performance numbers from existing UC buildings. A projected 30% savings in Basic buildings is 3.3 kWh/sf-yr and 0.3 th/sf-yr. A projected 30% savings in Complex buildings is 8.9 kWh/sf-yr and 0.4 th/sf-yr. These savings were projected to the building areas identified in the Capital Program document. Where building area was not directly identified, it was estimated from the project budget based on a projected construction cost of $611 per gross square foot. This is based on the average construction cost of the projects where stated ($917 per assignable square foot) and the observed ratio of gross square feet to assignable square feet from the UCOP comprehensive building list (1.5). The 2007-08 to 2011-12 Capital Program identifies hundreds of planned projects. Savings By Design projects for the Strategic Energy Plan were not calculated for projects which are currently on the UCOP list of Savings By Design projects underway through the current program. It was assumed that these projects are too advanced in the design process to switch to a deeper savings investment based on the proposed SEP process. In addition projects were not included on the SEP list if they are shown with an occupancy date of 2007-08 or 2008-09. It is assumed that these projects are too far along in design to allow significant changes. Once the new SEP program is underway, there may be an opportunity to include some of these projects, or to replace recommended measures that could not be supported in the original budget. Also excluded from the SEP project list are buildings listed for occupancy in 2014-15 or later, parking structures, and general infrastructure projects. Several buildings were added to the list by request of a campus. The projects listed include new buildings and renovation of existing buildings. In some cases the projects are not defined, but fall under general budgets, such as Campus Approved Projects Under $5 Million. The total list assumes that energy efficiency is an integral part of each of these projects. 8.5 Deferred Maintenance and Capital Renewal Projects There is a significant budget spent on deferred maintenance and capital renewal projects each year. This is an investment in returning buildings and equipment to proper operating condition. This often includes roof replacement, window replacement and chiller or boiler replacement. This project comes from a different source than the capital project funding. Each campus produces a list based on a combination of priorities, although energy savings are typically not a factor. Although projects typically may save a nominal amount of energy, the replacement of this type of equipment typically has a long simple payback if calculated on energy savings only. Certainly some capital investment could be used to increase the efficiency of a project by improving the U value of a roof, increasing the performance of glazing or improving the efficiency of a chiller or boiler. 2413.01/Reports/UC SEP Final Report – UCLA.doc 8-14 December 31, 2008 Newcomb | Anderson | McCormick
The budget that each campus has to spend on these projects is highly variable. It can be in the range of $10 million per year in a good year. It has been estimated that about 12% of these projects have an energy savings component. An increment of $0.25 to $0.5 million per year of deferred maintenance and capital renewal projects is used in the SEP project list. The campuses could elect to include one or more of these projects per year in their SEP commitment. 8.6 Campus Wide Projects 8.6.1 Campus Wide Project 1. Refrigerators It is recommended that all pre-2001 refrigerator units be replaced by Energy Star units. Old refrigerators can consume twice the electricity of a current Energy Star unit. Refrigerators are especially prevalent in universities where they are widely used in both academic and residential settings. Electricity and cost savings were calculated using the Energy Star calculator adapted for replacement of pre-2001 residential-type refrigerators on campuses. Refrigerators in Housing – The number of refrigerators in housing per campus were estimated based on the total number of apartment-type housing and suite-type housing available on each campus. Where available, we used the numbers of housing refrigerators to be replaced, as specified by the campus. Refrigerators on Campus – The number of refrigerators on campus was estimated based data provided by the UCB BETS database and prorated by the number of enrolled students at each campus. The BETS database provides an inventory of refrigerators that were purchased before 2001. 8.6.2 Campus Wide Project 2. Lab Freezers It is recommended that all pre-2001 lab freezers be replaced by energy efficient units. According to New Brunswick Science (NBS), current energy efficient units consume half the amount of electricity of the industry average. Due to this significant waste of energy, Energy Star is currently developing standards for the industry. These units are especially prevalent in universities where they are widely used in research settings. Electricity and cost savings are calculated using data for ultra-low temperature (-86°F) upright lab freezers provided by NBS. While the Energy Star standards are currently being developed, this calculation can serve as an estimate for -20° to -30°F lab freezers as well by using an average industry installed cost of $7,000. The number of ultra-low temperature lab freezers on each campus was estimated based on data provided by the UCB BETS database and prorated by the number of enrolled students at each campus. 8.6.3 Campus Wide Project 3. Server Virtualization Server Virtualization maximizes the utilization of servers by installing virtualization software on existing servers and allows the elimination of idling or under-utilized physical servers. Energy savings potential was calculated based on deemed values provided by the SCE "Virtual Machine" calculator, version 6. The baseline server assumed the default values provided by the SCE calculator, whereas the proposed VM server used an average of two servers' specifications, "HP DL 585" and "Dell Blade 1955", servers that UC Berkeley are considering for 2413.01/Reports/UC SEP Final Report – UCLA.doc 8-15 December 31, 2008 Newcomb | Anderson | McCormick
Page 1: UC STRATEGIC ENERGY PLAN University
Page 4 and 5: TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 12. E
Page 7 and 8: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Policy on
Page 9 and 10: Table 1.1: Summary of Baseline and
Page 11: The campus has reviewed a prelimina
Page 14 and 15: Construction costs of recommended p
Page 16 and 17: Campus Los Angeles Santa Monica Hos
Page 18 and 19: 2.3 Campus Overview University of C
Page 20 and 21: Table 2.4: SEP Buildings (Continued
Page 23: 3. HISTORICAL CAMPUS ENERGY USE 3.1
Page 26 and 27: 4.2 Individual Building Metering Bu
Page 28 and 29: of UCSD buildings is shown in Figur
Page 31: 5. UTILITIES 5.1 Providers & Tariff
Page 35 and 36: 7. RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION 7.1
Page 37 and 38: 8. RECOMMENDED ENERGY EFFICIENCY PR
Page 39 and 40: One campus, UC Santa Barbara, has c
Page 41 and 42: The controllers themselves are prog
Page 43 and 44: 8.2.3 Air Handler Project 3. Demand
Page 45 and 46: standard control sequence. Temperat
Page 47 and 48: 8.2.11 Laboratory Air Handler Proje
Page 49: The projected MBCx energy savings f
Page 53 and 54: 8.7 Other Projects 8.7.1 Swimming P
Page 55 and 56: 8.8.3 UCLA Custom Project 3. TOD Co
Page 57: 9. BUILDING OVERVIEW & PROJECTS The
Page 60 and 61: Strategic Energy Plan Projects SEP
Page 66 and 67: 2006-2008 Partnership Projects Stra
Page 100 and 101:
Strategic Energy Plan Projects SEP
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 135 and 136:
PROJECT DETAIL REPORT SEP Project I
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139:
Page 142 and 143:
City: Los Angeles City Index Materi
Page 144 and 145:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 413 and 414:
11. PROJECT LISTS & SUMMARY OF PROJ
Page 415 and 416:
Table 11.1: SEP Projects by Funding
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421:
Page 424 and 425:
educing growth adjusted electricity
Page 426 and 427:
step within the Strategic Energy Pl
Page 429:
Appendix A Field Data Forms (Electr
Page 433:
Appendix C Other Calculations and D
show all

UC Los Angeles Campus & Medical Center Strategic Energy Plan ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?