24.07.2013 Views

UC Los Angeles Campus & Medical Center Strategic Energy Plan ...

UC Los Angeles Campus & Medical Center Strategic Energy Plan ...

UC Los Angeles Campus & Medical Center Strategic Energy Plan ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

future VM projects. The number of "virtualizable servers" per campus was estimated using data<br />

provided by the <strong>UC</strong> Berkeley IT Department and then prorated by the number of enrolled<br />

students per campus in Fall 2006. This includes both the decentralized servers across campus<br />

and servers that are in the data center servers. A ratio of ten baseline servers consolidated<br />

onto one virtual machine was used based on a conservative estimate from past partnership<br />

projects.<br />

Note that this project is based on the reduction in the number of servers operating and their<br />

local air conditioning load. Where a large air handler was operating continuously to cool a<br />

server, this measure was included in the HVAC projects.<br />

8.6.4 <strong>Campus</strong> Wide Project 4. Network Computer Power Management Software/CRT<br />

Network computer power management software is recommended to power down computers<br />

that are on the network when they are not being used. Network PC power management<br />

software energy savings potential was calculated based on deemed values provided by the<br />

Verdiem PG&E work paper. Installed cost was estimated by the retail price of the software with<br />

installation, and with additional maintenance and support costs. For each campus, the number<br />

of computers on campus was estimated based on data provided by <strong>UC</strong> Berkeley's BETS<br />

database and prorated by the number of enrolled students per campus in Fall 2006. The BETS<br />

database showed the number of computers on campus older than 5 years. To be conservative,<br />

we estimated that half of these computers represented the number of managed, networkedcomputers<br />

on which power management software could be installed. However, we recommend<br />

that power management software be installed on all managed, networked-computers.<br />

CRT monitor to LCD monitor conversions were also recommended for each campus. Both the<br />

energy savings potential and cost were based on the <strong>Energy</strong> Star calculator for LCDs, adapted<br />

to represent conventional 17" CRT monitors to be replaced by <strong>Energy</strong> Star 17" LCDs. We<br />

recommend, however, that all CRTs be replaced with <strong>Energy</strong> Star LCDs to maximize energy<br />

savings.<br />

8.6.5 <strong>Campus</strong> Wide Project 5. Install Controllers on Vending Machines<br />

Vending machines and sliding-door coolers can easily be retrofit to use approximately 40<br />

percent less energy using inexpensive controllers. To examine the potential for this efficiency<br />

measure, counts of sliding door coolers and two types of vending machines, refrigerated and<br />

non-refrigerated, were collected from the <strong>UC</strong> campuses. Information about existing measures to<br />

reduce the energy consumption of these machines (e.g. requiring service providers to use<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> Star machines) was also gathered to avoid duplication of those efforts. For campuses<br />

that were not able to provide vending machine data, typical values determined for the rest of the<br />

<strong>UC</strong> system were applied.<br />

Based on the reported or estimated number of vending machines on each campus and the<br />

estimated annual energy usage of a machine, the existing energy consumption of all vending<br />

machines was calculated for each campus. For campuses that had not implemented controls or<br />

had done so only to a limited extent, full use of controllers on all campus vending machines and<br />

sliding-door coolers is recommended. The energy and cost savings associated with<br />

implementing this measure are calculated based on typical energy savings listed in the<br />

Database for <strong>Energy</strong> Efficient Resources (2005) and reported by equipment manufacturers.<br />

2413.01/Reports/<strong>UC</strong> SEP Final Report – <strong>UC</strong>LA.doc 8-16 December 31, 2008<br />

Newcomb | Anderson | McCormick

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!