intervention strategies for renovation of social housing estates

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Laurentino38. Example of deprived social housing estates in Rome. Chapter 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The limits emerging in the first P.E.E.P. were revised and corrected in the second. Major adaptations regarded location, size and function of the neighbourhoods were provided. They were defined as interstitial building sites within the consolidated city, introducing mix-use (offices, services and social and commercial facilities) and housed around 4.500 inhabitants (Rossi, 2000). PUBLIC HOSUING AGENCY INA-Casa GESCAL LAW PERIOD AIM Law n.43/1949, n.1148/1955 for the National Plan INA-Casa Law n.1148/1955 for the National Plan INA-Casa Law n. 60/1963 for GESCAL fund LAURENTINO 38 43-56 57-63 Solve housing and employment problems involving public administrations, professionals and artisans. Promoting building activity 65-80 Built social housing neighborhoods FINANCIAL SOURCES Workers, building firms and government Workers and employers HOUSING FEATURES 14 Guide lines Minimum housing requirements (30-90 m2 for 1-5 rooms); Function: separation from living and sleeping areas; Building elements: loggias and balconies. Average floor area: 50- 60m2 Guide lines: Minimum housing requirements (50-110 m2 for 1-5 rooms); Function: separation of kitchen and living rooms; Shared Facilities: pillar on the ground floor Average floor area: 80- 90m2 Regulations: Minimum housing requirements (64-112 m2 for 2-5 rooms). Prefabrication allowed more diversified typologies The urban plan of Laurentino38 was initiated in 1972 by the local municipality, GESCAL and IACP. Its implementation coincides with to other two large housing neighbourhoods, Corviale and Vigne Nuove. Each has its own experimental character: ‘extensive urban expansion’ (Laurentino38), ‘urban healing in the periphery’ (Corviale. See the pictures in the next page) and ‘urban mending of the periphery’ (Vigne Nuove) (Barucci et al., 1979). A design group, composed by four departments, was formed to carry out the project 15 . The group leader of the building department was Pietro Barucci. Objectives of the design of Laurentino might be summarized as follows: Integrated relationship with the surroundings: services within the neighbourhood not only available on the local but also on the urban level; Independent character: self-sufficient neighbourhood; Enhancement of natural values: environment and archaeological remains; Housing meeting modern living requirements: emphasising collectivity. Ensure: public spaces, accessibility, urban – building - housing differentiation and size facilitating management 14 Acocella, A (1980) “L’edilizia residenziale pubblica in Italia dal 1945 ad oggi” and GESCAL (1964) Norme tecniche di esecuzione delle costruzioni con special riferimento alla progettazion 15 In particular, the four groups were: building department, structures and statistics calculations department, technical equipments department, and programming and costs department. To the building department took part de Rossi, Giovannini, Nucci, Sostegni. 12. G LAURENTINO38 OBJECTIVES
Laurentino38. Example of deprived social housing estates in Rome. Chapter 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The size of the neighbourhood and especially the urgency of its implementation required quick building processes. It was necessary to use a technology satisfying the standards provided by law that also reduced constructive costs and allowed phasing of building works (Barucci et al., 1979). With respect to such constraints, the ‘tunnel’ form work seemed to be the perfect technology. Since the late ‘60s to the ‘80s, it was very popular all over the country to build multifamily housing blocks (Di Giulio in Andeweg, 2007). This came from France and first experimented with in Rome in Laurentino38. The technology compares to that described for the Bijlmermeer. A similar concept was used in Laurentino38 but, unlike the Bijlmermeer, in this case the ground floor is porticoed (section 7.1.1). As mentioned, dwellings of Laurentino38 were designed according to the standardized span of the bearing structure. Thanks to the tunnel formwork, it was possible to produce one housing unit per day. The daily phases were the followings 16 : disarm previous tunnel and arm the next one; vertical placement of doors, windows, reinforcing bars and technical equipments; horizontal placement of reinforcing bars and technical equipments; blast of concrete and its accelerated maturation (by means of heat generator within the tunnel); installation of prefabricated (in situ) concrete elements: external walls (single panels), loggias 17 and stairs; final concrete blast; completion of infill, installations and facades (coloured plaster) In this way, the in-line and the tower block could be finished in 64 and 56 days, respectively. After completion of the works with the tunnel, four months were required for finalizing works. 16Information about phasing of building works have been kindly given by Arch. Fantastichini (ATER Roma) working on a research on Laurentino 38 on behalf of La Sapienza University, Roma. A book on this subject will published soon. 17 The loggias are composed by two separated parts: an horizontal element (floor and parapet) and a vertical element (closure wall with door) 13. G BUILDIGN TECHNOLOGY PHASING OF THE WORKS
Page 1:
INTERVENTION STRATEGIES FOR RENOVAT
Page 4 and 5:
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Page 7 and 8:
The research set up Chapter 1 -----
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Theoretical background Chapter 2 --
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Social housing renovation Italy: wh
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Approaches to renovation interventi
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74: Approaches to renovation interventi
Page 75 and 76: A Dutch case study. The Bijlmermeer
Page 97 and 98: Florijn Noord. An example of renova
Page 113 and 114: Laurentino38. Example of deprived s
Page 123: Laurentino38. Example of deprived s
Page 141 and 142: Physical measures for renovation of
Page 157 and 158: PHYSICAL ASPECTS (technical-functio
Page 159 and 160: Directed to PHYSICAL ASPECTS (funct
Page 161 and 162: Directed to the APPEARANCE FACADE 2
Page 163 and 164: Directed to the APPEARANCE STAIRWEL
Page 165 and 166: Directed to SOCIAL ASPECTS PHYSICAL
Page 167 and 168: Conclusions and recommendations. Ch
Page 175 and 176:
Conclusions and recommendations. Ch
Page 177 and 178:
A.A.V.V. (1997). The new Bijlmermee
Page 179 and 180:
Leupen, B. (2006). Frame and generi
Page 181:
Van Kempen, R., Murie, A., Tosics,
show all

intervention strategies for renovation of social housing estates

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?