17.08.2013 Views

intervention strategies for renovation of social housing estates

intervention strategies for renovation of social housing estates

intervention strategies for renovation of social housing estates

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Theoretical background Chapter 2<br />

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

2.2) PROBLEMS AFFECTING LARGE POST-WWII<br />

HOUSING ESTATES<br />

Initially, these large <strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong> functioned well on their perspective on the local <strong>housing</strong><br />

market and residents were satisfied with their dwellings and neighbourhood (van Beckhoven<br />

et al, 2005).<br />

In later years, some large <strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong> lost their favorable position on the <strong>housing</strong> market<br />

they occupied in the beginning. Neighbourhood stigmatization played a role in this process<br />

(Wassenberg, 2004). Gradually, satisfaction made place <strong>for</strong> complaints about the dwellings<br />

and the neighbourhood and the surroundings and most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>estates</strong> were confronted with<br />

deterioration problems.<br />

All single <strong>estates</strong> are more or less different, but many common characteristics across Europe<br />

can be identified. According to Turkington and colleagues, the problems affecting post-WWII<br />

large <strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong> can be identified. They can be grouped into three main classes that<br />

are: <strong>housing</strong> stock, management and residents’ related problems (van Beckhoven et al,<br />

2005).<br />

In the first group there are included problems related to the construction methods (structural<br />

problems because <strong>of</strong> poor materials), to the <strong>housing</strong> layout (problems caused by poor<br />

internal design), to the competition with other <strong>estates</strong> with better market position and image<br />

and, finally, to the inadequate urban design.<br />

In the management group there are clustered problems related to legislation,<br />

finance/exploitation and management itself.<br />

Finally, in the residents related group there are incorporated problems caused by the internal<br />

<strong>social</strong> environment (like anti-<strong>social</strong> behavior and noise pollution) and the so-called wider<br />

socio-economic aspects (like high unemployment, poor schooling, drug- and alcohol-abuse)<br />

(van Beckhoven et al, 2005).<br />

Nevertheless, a number <strong>of</strong> positive elements have been inherited from the large <strong>housing</strong><br />

<strong>estates</strong> model. Many people are positive about the design <strong>of</strong> the <strong>estates</strong> themselves and the<br />

large amount <strong>of</strong> green public spaces. Separation <strong>of</strong> functions is sometimes mentioned as a<br />

good measure in favor <strong>of</strong> safer traffic and prevention <strong>of</strong> pollution from industries. Moreover,<br />

besides being af<strong>for</strong>dable, dwellings in these <strong>estates</strong> are very large, bright and sunny (van<br />

Beckhoven et al, 2005). They are <strong>of</strong>ten located close to the city or to natural areas; it also<br />

happened that due to their good accessibility system, some neighborhoods become business<br />

centers (Dekker and Van Kempen, 2005).<br />

2.3) MODELS DESCRIBING NEIGHBORHOOD CHANGE<br />

AND DECAY3<br />

Until the 1990s, the research was not so much focused on the changes in these<br />

neighbourhoods. The political attention was concentrated on <strong>renovation</strong>, and sometimes on<br />

demolition, <strong>of</strong> pre-war <strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong>, and especially on the realization <strong>of</strong> new <strong>housing</strong><br />

<strong>estates</strong> elsewhere (Priemus, 1991 in van Beckhoven et al, 2005). Since the 1990s, the<br />

attention to the post WWII neighborhoods increased at an European level, especially<br />

concerning large <strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong>, mainly because the problems in these <strong>estates</strong> increased<br />

(van Beckhoven et al, 2005).<br />

Recently, a number <strong>of</strong> researchers have studied the present character <strong>of</strong> post-WWII large<br />

<strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong>, their position on the <strong>housing</strong> market and their current physical, <strong>social</strong> and<br />

economic developments (such as Power, Murie, Skifter Andersen, Turkington, Musterd and<br />

3 Most <strong>of</strong> the In<strong>for</strong>mation in this paragraph are strongly based on Van Beckhoven, E., Bolt, G., van Kempen, R. (2005)<br />

Theories <strong>of</strong> neighbourhood change and neighbourhood decline: their significance <strong>for</strong> post-WWII large <strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong>,<br />

paper presented at the ENHR-conference “Housing in Europe: new challenges and innovations in Tomorrow’s cities”,<br />

Reykjavik, 29 June – 2 July 2005 and on Priemus, H. (2005) Decay <strong>of</strong> large <strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong> revisited Keynote speech at<br />

the RESTATE Conference “Restructuring large <strong>housing</strong> <strong>estates</strong> in Europe: policies, practices and perspectives”,<br />

Ljubljana, May 21, 2005<br />

3. B

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!