Programska knjižnica 9. Lošinjskih dana bioetike - Hrvatsko ...
Programska knjižnica 9. Lošinjskih dana bioetike - Hrvatsko ...
Programska knjižnica 9. Lošinjskih dana bioetike - Hrvatsko ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DIJANA MAGĐINSKI<br />
Jastrebarsko, Croatia /<br />
Jastrebarsko, Hrvatska<br />
DOES A “HUMAN METEOR” HAVE A MORAL DUTY?<br />
The UN declared the year 2010 to be the International Year of Biodiversity<br />
under the slogan “Biodiversity is life, biodiversity is our life”<br />
and accompanied by a logo which portrays human life in harmony with<br />
nature and symbolizes human commitment to preserve biodiversity. This<br />
may seem contradictory to a critical mind. Because, if we are part of nature<br />
and are governed by the same natural laws like the rest of the beings,<br />
then we are in constant competition with these beings and it seems that<br />
we don’t have moral duty to preserve them. Proponents of this view assert<br />
that massive extinction, to which we bear witness today, is just a natural<br />
phenomenon that shows human’s efficiency as a competitor. On the other<br />
hand, “man as a governor and guardian” argument implies that we do have<br />
a moral duty for preserving biodiversity, but it seems to put human outside<br />
of nature. In this essay I will consider both arguments and try to reconcile<br />
them. Goal of this essay is to show that man is obligated to preserve biodiversity,<br />
although he is a part of nature.<br />
IMA LI »LJUDSKI METEOR« MORALNU DUŽNOST?<br />
UN je 2010. godinu proglasio Međunarodnom godinom bioraznolikosti,<br />
pod sloganom »Bioraznolikost je život, bioraznolikost je naš život« te<br />
s logom koji oslikava ljudski život u harmoniji s prirodom i simbolizira<br />
obvezu čovjeka da očuva bioraznolikost. Kritičkom umu se to može činiti<br />
kontradiktornim. Jer ako smo dio prirode i upravljani istim prirodnim zakonima<br />
kao i sva ostala bića, onda smo s tim istim bićima u neprestanoj<br />
kompeticiji i čini se kako nemamo moralnu dužnost očuvati ih. Zagovornici<br />
takvog stajališta ističu da je masovno izumiranje, kojemu smo svjedoci<br />
<strong>dana</strong>s, tek prirodni fenomen koji pokazuje uspješnost čovjeka kao kompetitora.<br />
S druge strane, argument čovjeka kao upravitelja i čuvara implicira<br />
da imamo moralnu dužnost očuvati bioraznolikost, ali čini se da postavlja<br />
čovjeka izvan prirode. U ovom radu ću sagledati oba argumenta te ih pokušati<br />
pomiriti. Cilj rada je pokazati da čovjek ima obvezu očuvanja bioraznolikosti,<br />
iako je dio prirode.<br />
92