Programska knjiÅ¾nica 9. LoÅ¡injskih dana bioetike - Hrvatsko ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EUTHANASIA IN THE LIGHT OF JESUS’ DEATH ON THE CROSS Social Construction of a Dignified Death “Later, knowing that all was now completed, and so that the Scripture would be fulfilled, Jesus said, ‘I am thirsty.’ A jar of wine vinegar was there, so they soaked a sponge in it, put the sponge on a stalk of the hyssop plant, and lifted it to Jesus’ lips. When he had received the drink, Jesus said, ‘It is finished.’ With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.” (John 19, 28–30) Relying on the reports of the Jesus’ wail on the cross “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?!”, the author discusses the feeling of abandonment of the contemporary human who, for example, lies terminally ill in a hospital, and who has no choice, in order to get rid of the suffering, but to ask someone to help him die. Did the Roman soldiers assist Jesus, as he hung helpless on the cross, to die by giving him to drink vinegar (or maybe poison), in order to allow him to die a dignified death before the Sabbath (without breaking legs)? This discussion on euthanasia the author based on the view that it is a socially constructed fact which, like other forms of assisted dying, was interpreted in different ways throughout history. For the meanings, that euthanasia had and has today, have been determined according to the need of the specific societies in the given times, which led the author to pay special attention to the “spirit of time”, i.e. social and religious circumstances at the time of Jesus’ life and ways of providing assistance in dying, and therefore the reasons for using vinegar (or poison). With this discussion the author does not want to dispute with Christian theologians and their interpretations of this part of the Gospel, but only wants, using this part of the Gospel, to bring forward the discussion of “human dignity” and euthanasia as “a death worthy of the human” as terms which have become a corny phrase of everyday speech. 94
NEVENA MILOSAVLJEVIĆ 1 , SVETLANA MIĆIĆ 2 1 Ivanjica, Srbija / Ivanjica, Serbia 2 Beograd, Srbija / Belgrade, Serbia BIOETIČKI ASPEKTI STAROSTI »Kada se ljupkost udruži sa borama – to je očaravajuće. Postoji neizrecivo svitanje u sretnom starenju.« (William Hazlitt) Čovjek je oduvijek nastojao da učini sebe besmrtnim ili se barem pitao koliko bi se maksimalno mogao produžiti običan ljudski vijek. Starenje je kompleksan proces koji počinje rađanjem i traje cijelog života, izazivajući niz promjena u organizmu. Broj starih ljudi je u stalnom porastu, posebno u razvijenim zemljama svijeta. Gerontologija predstavlja znanost koja istražuje kako fizičke procese starenja, tako i društvene i kulturne faktore koji su s tim u vezi, dok je pojam gerijatrije rezerviran za posebno područje medicine koje je usmjereno ka populaciji starih osoba. Karakteristična pojava za moderna društva – ejdžizam (engl. age – dob, uzrast) zapravo podrazumijeva nejednak tretman ili uskraćivanje nekog prava zbog godina starosti, od strane pojedinca ili organizacije. Osnovne komponente ejdžizma su predrasude, stereotipi i diskriminacija. Starost je široko polje djelovanja medicinskog radnika, u kojem lidersku ulogu preuzima izabrani liječnik u domovima zdravlja (u smislu izvaninstitucionalnog liječenja), u nastojanju da starijim osobama pruži maksimalnu podršku kako bi sačuvale svoju vitalnost i aktivnost. Osnovna etička načela obvezuju svakog zdravstvenog radnika da razvija i usavršava etičku svijest te da poštuje i dosljedno provodi osnovna načela etike, uvijek i isključivo u interesu zdravlja i života čovjeka. Umjesto zaključka, u referatu su prikazani ilustrativni primjeri koji ukazuju na eventualne bioetičke dileme koje se tiču starih pacijenata (umirući pacijent – eutanazija, saopćavanje loših vijesti, dostojanstvo, informirani pristanak, autonomija i volja pacijenta, gerijatrijski sindromi, itd.). 95
Page 1:
9. LOŠINJSKI DANI BIOETIKE Mali Lo
Page 5:
SADRŽAJ / CONTENTS Organizacijski
Page 9:
ORGANIZACIJSKI ODBOR LOŠINJSKIH DA
Page 13 and 14:
Prvi lošinjski bioetički skup odr
Page 15:
9. LOŠINJSKI DANI BIOETIKE Ovogodi
Page 19 and 20:
NEDJELJA, 16. svibnja 2010. / SUNDA
Page 21 and 22:
SEKCIJA B: Simpozij - Hotel AURORA,
Page 23 and 24:
SEKCIJA A: Simpozij - Hotel AURORA,
Page 25 and 26:
16.15-16.30 DRAGAN ILIĆ, VIKTORIJA
Page 27 and 28:
19.00 Večera / Dinner 21.00 (Hotel
Page 29 and 30:
10.00-10.15 TIJANA TRAKO (Croatia/H
Page 31 and 32:
Care. A Case Study of Bosnia and He
Page 33 and 34:
12.30-12.45 JANA HODŽIĆ (Hrvatska
Page 35:
SEKCIJA B: Simpozij - Hotel AURORA,
Page 39 and 40:
simpozij INTEGRATIVNA BIOETIKA I NO
Page 41 and 42:
SEAD ALIĆ, LIVIA PAVLETIĆ Centar
Page 43 and 44: MIROSLAV ARTIĆ Zagreb, Hrvatska /
Page 45 and 46: analyses the legal situation after
Page 47 and 48: (Zeitsouverenität), uvažiti vrije
Page 49 and 50: s procjenom ukupnih životnih troš
Page 51 and 52: znanstvenika koji su dokazali da ek
Page 53 and 54: Iz tog konteksta proizlazi i pitanj
Page 55 and 56: jabli i nepromjenljivih varijabli (
Page 57 and 58: HEDA FESTINI Rijeka, Hrvatska / Rij
Page 59 and 60: SREĆKO GAJOVIĆ Croatian Institute
Page 61 and 62: MICHAEL GEORGE Religious Studies De
Page 63 and 64: national minorities in Europe. This
Page 65 and 66: des Lebendigen und Technik des Nich
Page 67 and 68: JANA HODŽIĆ Zagreb, Hrvatska / Za
Page 69 and 70: AMER IGLICA 1 , GUILLAUME THIERY 1
Page 71 and 72: - 36% anketiranih smatra da bi vuln
Page 73 and 74: painless death. The most common met
Page 75 and 76: genetic conditions by introducing v
Page 77 and 78: INDICATIONS AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATI
Page 79 and 80: 4) Naposljetku, nastanak bioetike t
Page 81 and 82: ŽELJKO KALUĐEROVIĆ Filozofski fa
Page 83 and 84: more uncomfortable and painful than
Page 85 and 86: BORIS KOZJAK Hrvatska lutrija, Zagr
Page 87 and 88: UTE KRUSE-EBELING Institut für Phi
Page 89 and 90: society which make enormous harm to
Page 91 and 92: ka, ekonomska, društvena i socijal
Page 93: IVAN MARKEŠIĆ Institut društveni
Page 97 and 98: NADA MLADINA, ŽARKO MLADINA Medici
Page 99 and 100: ne forme do maštovitih kreacija u
Page 101 and 102: leaf size, flowers and seeds) which
Page 103 and 104: Etičke dileme vezane za ovo obolje
Page 105 and 106: AMER OVČINA 1,2 , AJNIJA OMANIĆ 2
Page 107 and 108: Former addicts need the emotional,
Page 109 and 110: JASMINKA PAVELIĆ Zavod za molekula
Page 111 and 112: VESNA PEŠIĆ 1 , EDUARD PAVLOVIĆ
Page 113 and 114: DARKO POLŠEK Faculty of Humanities
Page 115 and 116: IVA RINČIĆ, AMIR MUZUR Medicinski
Page 117 and 118: The discourse should not only be ab
Page 119 and 120: comprehensive notion of the world a
Page 121 and 122: philosophers of biology, epigenetic
Page 123 and 124: KIRIL TEMKOV Skopje, Makedonija / S
Page 125 and 126: Prije deset godina, anketa proveden
Page 127 and 128: PROSTITUTION AND AMORALITY Prostitu
Page 129 and 130: on the constituting and sustaining
Page 131 and 132: MARKO TRAJKOVIĆ 1 , NIKO JOSIĆ 2
Page 133 and 134: losophy, psychology, etc. Different
Page 135 and 136: ZVONIMIR TUCAK 1 , IVANA TUCAK 2 ,
Page 137 and 138: KAREL TURZA Medicinski fakultet, Un
Page 139 and 140: Those problems, though abstract and
Page 141 and 142: GENTIAN VYSHKA, GËZIM BOÇARI Facu
Page 143 and 144: In den Ausführungen meines Vortrag
Page 145 and 146:
kao neetično? Treba li primjena bi
Page 147:
kim farmama. Tome možemo dodati i
Page 150 and 151:
ings to light bioethical issues. Al
Page 152 and 153:
never offer ultimate truth and the
Page 154 and 155:
NINA ĐIKIĆ Filozofski fakultet, U
Page 156 and 157:
Tjelesne tekućine pokretački su s
Page 158 and 159:
through quite specific animated len
Page 160 and 161:
the audience ceases to act as a pas
Page 162 and 163:
znanosti. S nastankom bioetike i ak
Page 164 and 165:
MINE, YOUR, OUR BODY/IES? Many will
Page 166 and 167:
MEDICINE IN SERVICE OF CORPORATE IN
Page 168 and 169:
VALERIJE VRČEK Farmaceutsko-biokem
Page 170 and 171:
SUZANA VULETIĆ Katolički bogoslov
Page 173:
adresar sudionika addresses of the
Page 176 and 177:
Amela Džubur Univerzitet u Sarajev
Page 178 and 179:
Silvana Karačić Lječilište Svet
Page 180 and 181:
Vesna Pešić Nadbiskupija Rijeka D
Page 182 and 183:
Gentian Vyshka Lagja 1 Rruga Kostaq
Page 184 and 185:
Mirela Fuš Sveučilište u Rijeci
Page 186 and 187:
Nermina Trbonja Džemala Bijedića
Page 189:
predstavljanje recentnih bioetički
Page 192 and 193:
Matija Iviček (ur./ed.): Bioetika
Page 194 and 195:
Valerije Vrček: GMO između prisil
Page 196 and 197:
Joan Dunayer: Specizam / Speciesism
Page 199 and 200:
STALNI SPONZOR LOŠINJSKIH DANA BIO
show all

Programska knjiÅ¾nica 9. LoÅ¡injskih dana bioetike - Hrvatsko ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?