09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />

Boyte welcomed the opportunity <strong>for</strong> “updating <strong>and</strong> new<br />

thoughts,” given the intellectual <strong>and</strong> experimental ground that he<br />

had covered since David Brown’s HEX interview with him in 2000.<br />

In tying the threads together, Boyte takes aim at “technocratic politics—domination<br />

by experts removed from a common civic life—<br />

[that] has spread throughout contemporary society like a silent<br />

disease.” The Boyte “voice” on public work remains at the center<br />

<strong>of</strong> what Kettering <strong>and</strong> HEX are about—democracy is a verb.<br />

Chapter Four—Public Scholarship<br />

We asked Scott Peters, associate pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> education at Cornell<br />

<strong>University</strong>, who has been so prominent in HEX journals helping<br />

to develop the perspective <strong>of</strong> “public scholarship,” to share his ongoing<br />

research <strong>of</strong> the new connections that l<strong>and</strong>-grant colleges <strong>and</strong><br />

universities have been <strong>for</strong>ging with the public. Peters’ piece anchors<br />

the chapter, which also includes Jeremy Cohen’s story <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

scholarship <strong>of</strong> faculty <strong>and</strong> students at Penn State.<br />

In his piece, Peters responds to a question posed by Noëlle<br />

McAfee, another contributor to the book, “what kind <strong>of</strong> relationship<br />

should there be between the academy <strong>and</strong> the public?” Looking<br />

back, Peters sees the importance <strong>of</strong> the agriculture extension work<br />

<strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>-grant system. Looking ahead, however, he sees a “civic<br />

conception <strong>of</strong> academic pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism” more tenuous. After conducting<br />

extensive interviews, both individual <strong>and</strong> focus group, with<br />

current l<strong>and</strong>-grant faculty engaged with the public, Peters found<br />

that these “remarkably positive people” do not see their work<br />

“valued, supported, or pursued by most <strong>of</strong> their academic peers.”<br />

And so he concludes that such scholars face the task <strong>of</strong> reconstructing<br />

the democratic tradition <strong>of</strong> public scholarship in the l<strong>and</strong>-grant<br />

system. Can they succeed?<br />

Cohen, pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> communication <strong>and</strong> associate vice president<br />

<strong>and</strong> senior associate dean <strong>for</strong> undergraduate education at Penn<br />

State <strong>University</strong>, hardened by academic experience but with an infectious<br />

idealism nonetheless, was the subject <strong>of</strong> a HEX interview in<br />

2005 <strong>and</strong> told about the ongoing story <strong>of</strong> public scholarship at Penn<br />

State. So we asked him to advance that narrative by contributing<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!