Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
Boyte welcomed the opportunity <strong>for</strong> “updating <strong>and</strong> new<br />
thoughts,” given the intellectual <strong>and</strong> experimental ground that he<br />
had covered since David Brown’s HEX interview with him in 2000.<br />
In tying the threads together, Boyte takes aim at “technocratic politics—domination<br />
by experts removed from a common civic life—<br />
[that] has spread throughout contemporary society like a silent<br />
disease.” The Boyte “voice” on public work remains at the center<br />
<strong>of</strong> what Kettering <strong>and</strong> HEX are about—democracy is a verb.<br />
Chapter Four—Public Scholarship<br />
We asked Scott Peters, associate pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> education at Cornell<br />
<strong>University</strong>, who has been so prominent in HEX journals helping<br />
to develop the perspective <strong>of</strong> “public scholarship,” to share his ongoing<br />
research <strong>of</strong> the new connections that l<strong>and</strong>-grant colleges <strong>and</strong><br />
universities have been <strong>for</strong>ging with the public. Peters’ piece anchors<br />
the chapter, which also includes Jeremy Cohen’s story <strong>of</strong> the public<br />
scholarship <strong>of</strong> faculty <strong>and</strong> students at Penn State.<br />
In his piece, Peters responds to a question posed by Noëlle<br />
McAfee, another contributor to the book, “what kind <strong>of</strong> relationship<br />
should there be between the academy <strong>and</strong> the public?” Looking<br />
back, Peters sees the importance <strong>of</strong> the agriculture extension work<br />
<strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>-grant system. Looking ahead, however, he sees a “civic<br />
conception <strong>of</strong> academic pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism” more tenuous. After conducting<br />
extensive interviews, both individual <strong>and</strong> focus group, with<br />
current l<strong>and</strong>-grant faculty engaged with the public, Peters found<br />
that these “remarkably positive people” do not see their work<br />
“valued, supported, or pursued by most <strong>of</strong> their academic peers.”<br />
And so he concludes that such scholars face the task <strong>of</strong> reconstructing<br />
the democratic tradition <strong>of</strong> public scholarship in the l<strong>and</strong>-grant<br />
system. Can they succeed?<br />
Cohen, pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> communication <strong>and</strong> associate vice president<br />
<strong>and</strong> senior associate dean <strong>for</strong> undergraduate education at Penn<br />
State <strong>University</strong>, hardened by academic experience but with an infectious<br />
idealism nonetheless, was the subject <strong>of</strong> a HEX interview in<br />
2005 <strong>and</strong> told about the ongoing story <strong>of</strong> public scholarship at Penn<br />
State. So we asked him to advance that narrative by contributing<br />
6