Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Reconstructing a Democratic<br />
Tradition <strong>of</strong> Public Scholarship<br />
in the L<strong>and</strong>-Grant System<br />
Scott Peters<br />
In her chapter in this book, Noëlle McAfee asks what kind <strong>of</strong><br />
civic relationship there might be between the academy <strong>and</strong> the<br />
public. In this chapter, I explore the nature <strong>and</strong> promise <strong>of</strong> a civic<br />
relationship in which academic pr<strong>of</strong>essionals take up <strong>and</strong> interweave<br />
both responsive expert <strong>and</strong> proactive social critic <strong>and</strong> change agent<br />
roles, including the little recognized role <strong>of</strong> acting, in McAfee’s words,<br />
as “an ally in creating opportunities <strong>and</strong> ideas that support public<br />
making.” For more than a century, many scholars in l<strong>and</strong>-grant colleges<br />
<strong>of</strong> agriculture <strong>and</strong> human ecology (hereinafter “l<strong>and</strong>-grant<br />
colleges”) have taken up such roles by becoming engaged in public<br />
work that addresses not only the technical, but also the social, political,<br />
<strong>and</strong> cultural aspects <strong>of</strong> agricultural <strong>and</strong> environmental problems.<br />
In doing so, they have established one <strong>of</strong> the most important democratic<br />
traditions <strong>of</strong> public scholarship in American higher education.<br />
The history <strong>and</strong> contemporary nature <strong>of</strong> this tradition are not<br />
widely known. Further, there is reason to believe that its future is<br />
seriously endangered. In relation to these problems, my own work<br />
as a scholar is centered on the threefold task <strong>of</strong> reconstructing it: first,<br />
by examining how <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> what purposes scholars in l<strong>and</strong>-grant colleges<br />
developed a democratic tradition <strong>of</strong> public scholarship; second,<br />
by identifying <strong>and</strong> interpreting the nature, meaning, <strong>and</strong> significance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tradition in its historical <strong>and</strong> contemporary contexts; <strong>and</strong> third,<br />
by developing collaborative approaches to strengthening <strong>and</strong> defending<br />
it as one (among many) means <strong>of</strong> pursuing the “l<strong>and</strong>-grant<br />
mission,” a phrase that is <strong>of</strong>ten used to name the l<strong>and</strong>-grant system’s<br />
public purposes <strong>and</strong> work.<br />
Drawing from what I am learning in my research, which is still<br />
in its exploratory stage, the story I tell in this chapter is both inspiring<br />
<strong>and</strong> troubling. While there was <strong>and</strong> still is a democratic tradition <strong>of</strong><br />
public scholarship in l<strong>and</strong>-grant colleges, it has been <strong>and</strong> continues<br />
121