09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Portrait <strong>of</strong> a <strong>University</strong><br />

If public scholarship, like service learning <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-grant outreach,<br />

is about the service <strong>of</strong> the academy to others, then precisely because it<br />

is located within the university it is also about the purposeful conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> the diffusion <strong>of</strong> knowledge toward<br />

democratic ends. The public scholarship sprouts fertilized by Penn<br />

State’s rich l<strong>and</strong>-grant service roots did not germinate in the 1862<br />

L<strong>and</strong> Grant Act or the 1985 insight <strong>of</strong> Stan<strong>for</strong>d president Don Kennedy,<br />

Brown president Howard Swearer, <strong>and</strong> Georgetown president<br />

Timothy Healy, that led to the invention <strong>of</strong> Campus Compact <strong>and</strong><br />

the fertilization <strong>of</strong> the university service ethos. Penn State’s public<br />

scholarship germinated in the framers’ faith in the promise <strong>of</strong> sustainable<br />

liberty based on public sovereignty <strong>and</strong> on public sovereignty<br />

that is nourished by education as well as by experience. Service<br />

learning <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-grant policy nourish a university’s best instincts.<br />

Democratic principle—a constitutional obligation in the United<br />

States—provides a foundation deep enough to move discovery,<br />

diffusion, <strong>and</strong> democratic practice from charitable good will to<br />

political obligation.<br />

The comments that follow consider three <strong>for</strong>mative elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> our public scholarship work: the distinction between learning<br />

about democracy <strong>and</strong> learning democratic sovereignty; the importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> viewing service <strong>and</strong> service learning as elements <strong>of</strong> a larger<br />

endeavor in which service is only one component; <strong>and</strong> the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> a grassroots infrastructure when institutional support is lacking.<br />

They are neither fully inclusive nor complete. I’ve borrowed, begged,<br />

<strong>and</strong> reported ideas without proper citation <strong>and</strong> credit from several<br />

colleagues, including Carol Colbeck, Rosa Eberly, Connie Flanagan,<br />

Patty Wharton Michael, David Riley, Emily Janke, Tina Brazil, <strong>and</strong><br />

Lakshman Yapa, among others. My translations may not represent<br />

their views faithfully, let alone the views <strong>of</strong> my institution. These<br />

are my interpretations as an academic administrator, schooled in<br />

literature <strong>and</strong> creative writing during a time <strong>of</strong> political unrest at<br />

San Francisco State, <strong>and</strong> in First Amendment <strong>and</strong> behavioral communication<br />

scholarship at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Washington at the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> a cycle <strong>of</strong> constitutional rights expansion.<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!