Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Portrait <strong>of</strong> a <strong>University</strong><br />
If public scholarship, like service learning <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-grant outreach,<br />
is about the service <strong>of</strong> the academy to others, then precisely because it<br />
is located within the university it is also about the purposeful conservation<br />
<strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> the diffusion <strong>of</strong> knowledge toward<br />
democratic ends. The public scholarship sprouts fertilized by Penn<br />
State’s rich l<strong>and</strong>-grant service roots did not germinate in the 1862<br />
L<strong>and</strong> Grant Act or the 1985 insight <strong>of</strong> Stan<strong>for</strong>d president Don Kennedy,<br />
Brown president Howard Swearer, <strong>and</strong> Georgetown president<br />
Timothy Healy, that led to the invention <strong>of</strong> Campus Compact <strong>and</strong><br />
the fertilization <strong>of</strong> the university service ethos. Penn State’s public<br />
scholarship germinated in the framers’ faith in the promise <strong>of</strong> sustainable<br />
liberty based on public sovereignty <strong>and</strong> on public sovereignty<br />
that is nourished by education as well as by experience. Service<br />
learning <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-grant policy nourish a university’s best instincts.<br />
Democratic principle—a constitutional obligation in the United<br />
States—provides a foundation deep enough to move discovery,<br />
diffusion, <strong>and</strong> democratic practice from charitable good will to<br />
political obligation.<br />
The comments that follow consider three <strong>for</strong>mative elements<br />
<strong>of</strong> our public scholarship work: the distinction between learning<br />
about democracy <strong>and</strong> learning democratic sovereignty; the importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> viewing service <strong>and</strong> service learning as elements <strong>of</strong> a larger<br />
endeavor in which service is only one component; <strong>and</strong> the value<br />
<strong>of</strong> a grassroots infrastructure when institutional support is lacking.<br />
They are neither fully inclusive nor complete. I’ve borrowed, begged,<br />
<strong>and</strong> reported ideas without proper citation <strong>and</strong> credit from several<br />
colleagues, including Carol Colbeck, Rosa Eberly, Connie Flanagan,<br />
Patty Wharton Michael, David Riley, Emily Janke, Tina Brazil, <strong>and</strong><br />
Lakshman Yapa, among others. My translations may not represent<br />
their views faithfully, let alone the views <strong>of</strong> my institution. These<br />
are my interpretations as an academic administrator, schooled in<br />
literature <strong>and</strong> creative writing during a time <strong>of</strong> political unrest at<br />
San Francisco State, <strong>and</strong> in First Amendment <strong>and</strong> behavioral communication<br />
scholarship at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Washington at the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> a cycle <strong>of</strong> constitutional rights expansion.<br />
157