Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The New Engl<strong>and</strong> Center <strong>for</strong> Civic Life<br />
<strong>of</strong> that deliberative dialogue process might help the factions within<br />
the Jaffrey-Rindge School District build a bridge that would lead<br />
to greater community support <strong>of</strong> the district’s public schools.<br />
When NECCL got the call<br />
<strong>for</strong> help in April 2004, director<br />
Joni Doherty proposed the use <strong>of</strong><br />
the Sustained Dialogue process<br />
developed by Kettering Foundation<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> International<br />
Affairs Harold Saunders. It was a<br />
process we had used successfully<br />
<strong>for</strong> years at Franklin Pierce <strong>University</strong><br />
with students <strong>and</strong> faculty<br />
to talk about tensions related to<br />
racial/ethnic <strong>and</strong> other kinds <strong>of</strong><br />
social diversity within the campus<br />
community. The citizens’<br />
committee liked the process she<br />
proposed <strong>and</strong> invited Doherty to<br />
help them get started.<br />
They began meeting once a<br />
“Rather than aiming at<br />
knowledge representative<br />
<strong>of</strong> a collection <strong>of</strong> individuals,<br />
the practices <strong>of</strong><br />
deliberative democracy<br />
attempt to create legitimacy<br />
through the establishment<br />
<strong>of</strong> a public voice<br />
that reflects the common<br />
ground among them.”<br />
(“Living in the Lap <strong>of</strong> an Immense<br />
Intelligence: Lessons<br />
on Public Scholarship from<br />
the Field,”HEX, 2002.)<br />
week from May through August. Doherty was the facilitator at<br />
first, but soon turned that role over to coleaders representing each<br />
<strong>of</strong> the two groups. She helped them agree on a name—Citizens<br />
Seeking Common Ground—<strong>of</strong>fered meeting space at Franklin<br />
Pierce <strong>University</strong> <strong>for</strong> the group to use <strong>and</strong> coached them in how<br />
the dialogue process works. The weekly dialogue helped the members<br />
begin to better underst<strong>and</strong> the perspectives <strong>of</strong> those with whom<br />
they disagreed. As the weeks turned into months, members from<br />
both sides deepened their underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> each other <strong>and</strong><br />
began to see the issue in more complex terms <strong>and</strong> to view each<br />
other as real people, each with many legitimate concerns <strong>and</strong><br />
good ideas. Eventually, they saw that they shared many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
same values <strong>and</strong> hopes <strong>for</strong> their communities. They were propelled<br />
<strong>for</strong>ward by a belief that common ground could be <strong>for</strong>ged<br />
without compromising their ideals.<br />
191