Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> rural communities, but it also wracked serious cultural <strong>and</strong><br />
environmental damage. 17<br />
“Community members<br />
were <strong>of</strong>ten skeptical <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
research findings,<br />
<strong>for</strong> the good reason that<br />
they <strong>of</strong>ten did not reflect<br />
local experience.”<br />
(“Public Scholarship <strong>and</strong><br />
the L<strong>and</strong>-Grant Idea,”<br />
HEX, 1997.)<br />
While the historical tradition<br />
<strong>of</strong> public scholarship in the agricultural<br />
experiment station <strong>and</strong><br />
extension work <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>-grant<br />
system included practitioners who<br />
sought to “direct <strong>and</strong> aid” in the<br />
task <strong>of</strong> developing a new rural<br />
civilization through an oppressive<br />
technocratic politics, it also<br />
included practitioners who took<br />
up this task through productive,<br />
developmental, participatory, <strong>and</strong><br />
democratic varieties <strong>of</strong> civic republican<br />
<strong>and</strong> populist politics. For those who embraced a democratic<br />
rather than technocratic politics—including Liberty Hyde<br />
Bailey, Kenyon Butterfield, Mary Mims, <strong>and</strong> many others—the<br />
task was not to develop a rural civilization that would fuel an industrial<br />
economy with cheap food. Nor was it restricted to the de-<br />
132<br />
17 For the oppressive technocratic story about the l<strong>and</strong>-grant system, see J. Hightower,<br />
Hard Tomatoes, Hard Times (Cambridge, MA: Schenkman Publishing Company,<br />
1973-1978); C. E. Rosenberg, No Other Gods: On Science <strong>and</strong> American Social<br />
Thought (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins <strong>University</strong> Press, 1976/1997); W.<br />
Berry, The Unsettling <strong>of</strong> America: Culture <strong>and</strong> Agriculture, 3rd edition (San Francisco,<br />
CA: Sierra Club Books, 1977/1996); D. D. Danbom, The Resisted Revolution:<br />
Urban America <strong>and</strong> the Industrialization <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, 1900-1930 (Ames, IA: Iowa<br />
State <strong>University</strong> Press, 1979); A. I. Marcus, Agricultural Science <strong>and</strong> the Quest <strong>for</strong><br />
Legitimacy: Farmers, Agricultural <strong>College</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> Experiment Stations, 1870-1890<br />
(Ames, IA: Iowa State <strong>University</strong> Press, 1985); K. Jellison, Entitled to Power: Farm<br />
Women <strong>and</strong> Technology, 1913-1963 (Chapel Hill, NC: The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> North Carolina<br />
Press, 1993); M. Neth, Preserving the Family Farm: Women, Community, <strong>and</strong><br />
the Foundations <strong>of</strong> Agribusiness in the Midwest, 1900-1940 (Baltimore, MD: The<br />
Johns Hopkins <strong>University</strong> Press, 1995); H. S. Barron, Mixed Harvest: The Second<br />
Great Trans<strong>for</strong>mation in the Rural North, 1870-1930 (Chapel Hill, NC: The <strong>University</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> North Carolina Press, 1997); R. R. Kline, Consumers in the Country: Technology<br />
<strong>and</strong> Social Change in Rural America (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins<br />
<strong>University</strong> Press, 2000); <strong>and</strong> D. Fitzgerald, Every Farm a Factory: The Industrial<br />
Ideal in American Agriculture (New Haven, CT: Yale <strong>University</strong> Press, 2003).