Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
an impressive, multifaceted public relations ef<strong>for</strong>t to persuade citizens<br />
in the towns to take their side. As election time drew nigh, a<br />
“sign war” along the roadsides <strong>of</strong> the region made the division<br />
visible to all, especially when it was clear that each side had their<br />
signs v<strong>and</strong>alized <strong>and</strong> torn down by their opponents.<br />
The advocates <strong>for</strong> the new school felt the current buildings<br />
were not large enough or modern enough to meet the educational<br />
needs <strong>of</strong> the region’s growing school-age population. They thought<br />
those who opposed the bond issue <strong>for</strong> a new high school (<strong>and</strong> a renovated<br />
middle school at the site <strong>of</strong> the existing two schools) were<br />
basically voting against improved education out <strong>of</strong> self-interest in<br />
keeping their property taxes from getting higher. The school board<br />
<strong>and</strong> the advocates <strong>for</strong> a new school worked harder than ever in<br />
2003-2004 <strong>and</strong> hoped <strong>for</strong> a positive electoral result that spring. But<br />
they were defeated by an even greater margin than the year be<strong>for</strong>e.<br />
It was then that David Drouin, a citizen on the “pro new<br />
school” side <strong>of</strong> the dispute made a phone call to Jason Czekalski, a<br />
citizen from the group against that particular solution. They had<br />
been trading barbs in letters to the editor <strong>of</strong> the local newspaper<br />
during the run up to the election. “We’ve got to talk,” Drouin<br />
said. Czekalski agreed. Two weeks later at the next school board<br />
meeting, they <strong>of</strong>fered their idea to convene a citizens committee<br />
made up <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> the issue <strong>and</strong> asked the school<br />
board <strong>for</strong> their support. At that meeting, a community leader<br />
named Patricia Barry, who had worked with me <strong>and</strong> my students<br />
on a previous school/community Study Circles project in 1999,<br />
stood up <strong>and</strong> suggested that the group seek the help <strong>of</strong> the New<br />
Engl<strong>and</strong> Center <strong>for</strong> Civic Life (NECCL).<br />
School superintendent O’Neill had been involved with that<br />
Study Circles project, too. He had later attended a National Issues<br />
Forums (NIF) <strong>for</strong>um at Franklin Pierce <strong>University</strong> on “Public Schools:<br />
Are They Making the Grade?” <strong>and</strong> had come away from the event<br />
impressed at how the process enabled people to listen to each<br />
other’s different views <strong>and</strong> to find some common ground through<br />
their deliberations. Exacerbated by the limitations <strong>of</strong> other advocacybased<br />
civic engagement ef<strong>for</strong>ts, he wondered whether some version<br />
190