09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />

an impressive, multifaceted public relations ef<strong>for</strong>t to persuade citizens<br />

in the towns to take their side. As election time drew nigh, a<br />

“sign war” along the roadsides <strong>of</strong> the region made the division<br />

visible to all, especially when it was clear that each side had their<br />

signs v<strong>and</strong>alized <strong>and</strong> torn down by their opponents.<br />

The advocates <strong>for</strong> the new school felt the current buildings<br />

were not large enough or modern enough to meet the educational<br />

needs <strong>of</strong> the region’s growing school-age population. They thought<br />

those who opposed the bond issue <strong>for</strong> a new high school (<strong>and</strong> a renovated<br />

middle school at the site <strong>of</strong> the existing two schools) were<br />

basically voting against improved education out <strong>of</strong> self-interest in<br />

keeping their property taxes from getting higher. The school board<br />

<strong>and</strong> the advocates <strong>for</strong> a new school worked harder than ever in<br />

2003-2004 <strong>and</strong> hoped <strong>for</strong> a positive electoral result that spring. But<br />

they were defeated by an even greater margin than the year be<strong>for</strong>e.<br />

It was then that David Drouin, a citizen on the “pro new<br />

school” side <strong>of</strong> the dispute made a phone call to Jason Czekalski, a<br />

citizen from the group against that particular solution. They had<br />

been trading barbs in letters to the editor <strong>of</strong> the local newspaper<br />

during the run up to the election. “We’ve got to talk,” Drouin<br />

said. Czekalski agreed. Two weeks later at the next school board<br />

meeting, they <strong>of</strong>fered their idea to convene a citizens committee<br />

made up <strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> both sides <strong>of</strong> the issue <strong>and</strong> asked the school<br />

board <strong>for</strong> their support. At that meeting, a community leader<br />

named Patricia Barry, who had worked with me <strong>and</strong> my students<br />

on a previous school/community Study Circles project in 1999,<br />

stood up <strong>and</strong> suggested that the group seek the help <strong>of</strong> the New<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong> Center <strong>for</strong> Civic Life (NECCL).<br />

School superintendent O’Neill had been involved with that<br />

Study Circles project, too. He had later attended a National Issues<br />

Forums (NIF) <strong>for</strong>um at Franklin Pierce <strong>University</strong> on “Public Schools:<br />

Are They Making the Grade?” <strong>and</strong> had come away from the event<br />

impressed at how the process enabled people to listen to each<br />

other’s different views <strong>and</strong> to find some common ground through<br />

their deliberations. Exacerbated by the limitations <strong>of</strong> other advocacybased<br />

civic engagement ef<strong>for</strong>ts, he wondered whether some version<br />

190

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!