Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
became the dominant principle <strong>of</strong> American democracy, as the<br />
country engaged in the cold war against Communist collectivism.<br />
Higher education began a period <strong>of</strong> major democratization, in the<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> becoming accessible to more <strong>and</strong> more citizens, beginning<br />
with the Truman Report (1947) <strong>and</strong> the subsequent GI Bill. In 1958,<br />
the National Defense Education Act proclaimed that “the security<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Nation requires the fullest development <strong>of</strong> mental resources<br />
<strong>and</strong> technical skills <strong>of</strong> its young men <strong>and</strong> women.” This act further<br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed federal programs <strong>of</strong> institutional <strong>and</strong> individual financial<br />
aid. With massive federal assistance, the number <strong>of</strong> two- <strong>and</strong><br />
four-year institutions <strong>of</strong> higher education multiplied. In addition,<br />
racial <strong>and</strong> religious barriers to admission were <strong>of</strong>ficially ended.<br />
While the academy’s massive postwar expansion did in fact<br />
lead to the largest democratization <strong>of</strong> higher education in the history<br />
<strong>of</strong> the world, this expansion was justified by the cold war idea<br />
that we could undermine potential support <strong>for</strong> communism among<br />
working people by providing individuals with the opportunity to<br />
achieve personal prosperity. Consequently, cold war universities<br />
began to pioneer the idea that higher education should serve the<br />
public by advancing the career goals <strong>of</strong> individual students, rather<br />
than by preparing them <strong>for</strong> civic participation per se. This change<br />
corresponded with the accelerating shift towards liberal individualism<br />
<strong>and</strong> what Michael S<strong>and</strong>el calls the “procedural republic,”<br />
which simply leaves individuals free to pursue their own interests.<br />
Second, cold war universities continued to focus on the practical<br />
application <strong>of</strong> higher learning, but the focus tipped towards<br />
serving economic <strong>and</strong> military needs, rather than preparing citizens<br />
to engage in “public work.” In any event, American higher education<br />
continued preparing experts <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>for</strong> leadership<br />
positions, but, as William Sullivan notes, they increasingly educated<br />
them using a “default curriculum” that stressed instrumental individualism,<br />
positivism, <strong>and</strong> the fact/value distinction, rather than<br />
maintaining the traditional emphasis on citizenship, civic values,<br />
<strong>and</strong> philosophical reflection.<br />
Thus, despite the greatest democratization <strong>of</strong> higher education<br />
ever realized, American higher education became further<br />
66