09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />

became the dominant principle <strong>of</strong> American democracy, as the<br />

country engaged in the cold war against Communist collectivism.<br />

Higher education began a period <strong>of</strong> major democratization, in the<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> becoming accessible to more <strong>and</strong> more citizens, beginning<br />

with the Truman Report (1947) <strong>and</strong> the subsequent GI Bill. In 1958,<br />

the National Defense Education Act proclaimed that “the security<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Nation requires the fullest development <strong>of</strong> mental resources<br />

<strong>and</strong> technical skills <strong>of</strong> its young men <strong>and</strong> women.” This act further<br />

exp<strong>and</strong>ed federal programs <strong>of</strong> institutional <strong>and</strong> individual financial<br />

aid. With massive federal assistance, the number <strong>of</strong> two- <strong>and</strong><br />

four-year institutions <strong>of</strong> higher education multiplied. In addition,<br />

racial <strong>and</strong> religious barriers to admission were <strong>of</strong>ficially ended.<br />

While the academy’s massive postwar expansion did in fact<br />

lead to the largest democratization <strong>of</strong> higher education in the history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the world, this expansion was justified by the cold war idea<br />

that we could undermine potential support <strong>for</strong> communism among<br />

working people by providing individuals with the opportunity to<br />

achieve personal prosperity. Consequently, cold war universities<br />

began to pioneer the idea that higher education should serve the<br />

public by advancing the career goals <strong>of</strong> individual students, rather<br />

than by preparing them <strong>for</strong> civic participation per se. This change<br />

corresponded with the accelerating shift towards liberal individualism<br />

<strong>and</strong> what Michael S<strong>and</strong>el calls the “procedural republic,”<br />

which simply leaves individuals free to pursue their own interests.<br />

Second, cold war universities continued to focus on the practical<br />

application <strong>of</strong> higher learning, but the focus tipped towards<br />

serving economic <strong>and</strong> military needs, rather than preparing citizens<br />

to engage in “public work.” In any event, American higher education<br />

continued preparing experts <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>for</strong> leadership<br />

positions, but, as William Sullivan notes, they increasingly educated<br />

them using a “default curriculum” that stressed instrumental individualism,<br />

positivism, <strong>and</strong> the fact/value distinction, rather than<br />

maintaining the traditional emphasis on citizenship, civic values,<br />

<strong>and</strong> philosophical reflection.<br />

Thus, despite the greatest democratization <strong>of</strong> higher education<br />

ever realized, American higher education became further<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!