Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
Some proponents thought that civic engagement <strong>and</strong> dialogue<br />
might unleash radical <strong>and</strong> unpredictable social change; new political<br />
vistas would open. Some believed that the political equality<br />
<strong>and</strong> respect intrinsic in truly open-ended public deliberation was<br />
more radical than the economic redistribution promised by an<br />
activist state.<br />
Gen-X Students<br />
In 1994, when many pr<strong>of</strong>essors were Boomers, their students<br />
predominantly belonged to Generation X (born between 1965 <strong>and</strong><br />
1984). A typical undergraduate <strong>of</strong> that time had begun to pay<br />
attention to the public world during the relatively uneventful<br />
administrations <strong>of</strong> George H. W. Bush <strong>and</strong> Bill Clinton. Members<br />
<strong>of</strong> Gen X <strong>for</strong>med a relatively small cohort, raised in the shadow<br />
<strong>of</strong> the much more numerous Boomers, <strong>and</strong> they had the weakest<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> their own distinctness as a generation. In fact, no entelechy<br />
had occurred during their <strong>for</strong>mative years. However, the X-ers<br />
shared a sense that they had arrived too late <strong>for</strong> the dramatic<br />
events <strong>of</strong> 1965 to 1975, yet they lived with the consequences <strong>of</strong><br />
their parents’ choices. Further, they were marked by rising economic<br />
anxiety <strong>and</strong> a belief that their individual per<strong>for</strong>mance in<br />
school would have pr<strong>of</strong>ound effects on their economic futures.<br />
For “high-per<strong>for</strong>ming” students, including those who were female<br />
or people <strong>of</strong> color, some new opportunities seemed to have opened<br />
up. But the obverse <strong>of</strong> opportunity was risk. Students believed<br />
that they stood alone in the economy, unable to fall back on unions,<br />
neighborhoods, or even intact families. Especially after the recession<br />
<strong>of</strong> the early 1990s, higher education seemed the indispensable<br />
key to security. The economic value <strong>of</strong> college, rather than its potential<br />
<strong>for</strong> social change, was its most salient feature <strong>for</strong> students<br />
<strong>and</strong> their parents alike. 8<br />
The annual survey <strong>of</strong> incoming first-year college students<br />
conducted by the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI)<br />
16<br />
8 See Lewis A. Friedl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Shauna Morimoto, “The Changing Lifeworld <strong>of</strong><br />
Young People: Risk, Resume-Padding, <strong>and</strong> Civic Engagement,” (CIRCLE Working<br />
Paper number 40, September 2005).