09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />

Some proponents thought that civic engagement <strong>and</strong> dialogue<br />

might unleash radical <strong>and</strong> unpredictable social change; new political<br />

vistas would open. Some believed that the political equality<br />

<strong>and</strong> respect intrinsic in truly open-ended public deliberation was<br />

more radical than the economic redistribution promised by an<br />

activist state.<br />

Gen-X Students<br />

In 1994, when many pr<strong>of</strong>essors were Boomers, their students<br />

predominantly belonged to Generation X (born between 1965 <strong>and</strong><br />

1984). A typical undergraduate <strong>of</strong> that time had begun to pay<br />

attention to the public world during the relatively uneventful<br />

administrations <strong>of</strong> George H. W. Bush <strong>and</strong> Bill Clinton. Members<br />

<strong>of</strong> Gen X <strong>for</strong>med a relatively small cohort, raised in the shadow<br />

<strong>of</strong> the much more numerous Boomers, <strong>and</strong> they had the weakest<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> their own distinctness as a generation. In fact, no entelechy<br />

had occurred during their <strong>for</strong>mative years. However, the X-ers<br />

shared a sense that they had arrived too late <strong>for</strong> the dramatic<br />

events <strong>of</strong> 1965 to 1975, yet they lived with the consequences <strong>of</strong><br />

their parents’ choices. Further, they were marked by rising economic<br />

anxiety <strong>and</strong> a belief that their individual per<strong>for</strong>mance in<br />

school would have pr<strong>of</strong>ound effects on their economic futures.<br />

For “high-per<strong>for</strong>ming” students, including those who were female<br />

or people <strong>of</strong> color, some new opportunities seemed to have opened<br />

up. But the obverse <strong>of</strong> opportunity was risk. Students believed<br />

that they stood alone in the economy, unable to fall back on unions,<br />

neighborhoods, or even intact families. Especially after the recession<br />

<strong>of</strong> the early 1990s, higher education seemed the indispensable<br />

key to security. The economic value <strong>of</strong> college, rather than its potential<br />

<strong>for</strong> social change, was its most salient feature <strong>for</strong> students<br />

<strong>and</strong> their parents alike. 8<br />

The annual survey <strong>of</strong> incoming first-year college students<br />

conducted by the Higher Education Research Institute (HERI)<br />

16<br />

8 See Lewis A. Friedl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Shauna Morimoto, “The Changing Lifeworld <strong>of</strong><br />

Young People: Risk, Resume-Padding, <strong>and</strong> Civic Engagement,” (CIRCLE Working<br />

Paper number 40, September 2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!