Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
to be obscured by the prevailing view <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>-grant mission as<br />
responsive, narrowly instrumental, <strong>and</strong> apolitical public service.<br />
Also, it has been <strong>and</strong> continues to be marginalized by technocratic<br />
tendencies <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>ces, <strong>and</strong> by the research university norm <strong>of</strong> civic<br />
detachment. Additionally, the story I tell illuminates the conflicting<br />
<strong>and</strong> conflicted nature <strong>of</strong> scholars’ views about their political roles <strong>and</strong><br />
stances, including how they should underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> work through<br />
what historian Thomas Bender has referred to as “the dilemma <strong>of</strong><br />
the relation <strong>of</strong> expertise <strong>and</strong> democracy.” 1<br />
History<br />
The national l<strong>and</strong>-grant system was established through the<br />
Morrill Acts <strong>of</strong> 1862 <strong>and</strong> 1890 <strong>and</strong> the Equity in Education L<strong>and</strong>-<br />
Grant Status Act <strong>of</strong> 1994. It consists <strong>of</strong> 105 institutions located in<br />
all 50 states <strong>and</strong> several U.S. territories. A unique structural feature<br />
<strong>of</strong> this system is its institutionalization in colleges <strong>of</strong> agriculture <strong>and</strong><br />
human ecology <strong>of</strong> permanent mechanisms <strong>for</strong> engaging faculty,<br />
staff, <strong>and</strong> students as active participants in the world beyond the<br />
campus. These mechanisms are the national Agricultural Experiment<br />
Station System, which was established by the Hatch Act in<br />
1887, <strong>and</strong> the national Cooperative Extension System, which was<br />
established by the Smith-Lever Act in 1914. Most <strong>of</strong> the annually<br />
recurring funding <strong>for</strong> these systems is provided by government<br />
sources. In the FY 2006 budget, the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />
(USDA) provided more than $1 billion <strong>of</strong> funding, <strong>and</strong> an additional<br />
$1 billion or so was provided by state <strong>and</strong> county governments. 2<br />
122<br />
1 T. Bender, Intellect <strong>and</strong> Public Life (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins <strong>University</strong><br />
Press, 1993), 128.<br />
2 For the history <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>-grant system, see F. B. Mum<strong>for</strong>d, The L<strong>and</strong> Grant<br />
<strong>College</strong> Movement (Columbia, MO: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Missouri Agricultural Experiment<br />
Station, 1940); E. D. Ross, <strong>Democracy</strong>’s <strong>College</strong>: The L<strong>and</strong>-Grant Movement in<br />
the Formative Stage (Ames, IA: The Iowa State <strong>College</strong> Press, 1942); E. D. Eddy, Jr.,<br />
<strong>College</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Our L<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Time: The L<strong>and</strong>-Grant Idea in American Education (New<br />
York: Harper & Brothers, 1957); <strong>and</strong> National Association <strong>of</strong> State Universities<br />
<strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong>-Grant <strong>College</strong>s (NASULGC), The L<strong>and</strong>-Grant Tradition (Washington, DC:<br />
NASULGC, 1995.) Budget figures are taken from http://www.csrees.usda.gov/<br />
about/<strong>of</strong>fices/budget.html. (Accessed October 16, 2007.)