Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
both the congregational college <strong>and</strong> the people’s college. Directly<br />
influenced by the German ideal <strong>of</strong> the detached university, this<br />
new model developed in the context <strong>of</strong> many watershed changes<br />
in the nature <strong>of</strong> American public life <strong>and</strong> significantly altered<br />
the face <strong>of</strong> higher education in America. While these modernist<br />
research universities continued to produce public leaders, these<br />
leaders would come to be understood primarily as experts <strong>and</strong><br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, rather than moral leaders or active citizens. While<br />
the modernist research universities continued to provide future<br />
leaders with important knowledge, the curriculum began to <strong>for</strong>eground<br />
the ostensibly impartial natural <strong>and</strong> social sciences, rather<br />
than the explicitly normative approaches <strong>of</strong> religion <strong>and</strong> the humanities.<br />
And finally, while the modernist research universities continued<br />
to teach the type <strong>of</strong> thinking necessary <strong>for</strong> public decision making,<br />
an emphasis on scientific objectivity <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional expertise<br />
began to eclipse the traditional focus on philosophical reflection<br />
<strong>and</strong> deliberation. The modernist research universities were part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the modernist response to modernization.<br />
The emergence <strong>of</strong> the modernist research university relates<br />
directly to changes in American public life. In the latter part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
19th century, the abolition <strong>of</strong> slavery, the emergence <strong>of</strong> modern economic<br />
classes, an increasingly diverse new immigrant population,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the growth <strong>of</strong> cities, all resulted in a much more heterogeneous<br />
<strong>and</strong> conflictual American public, <strong>and</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> this increasing diversity<br />
led to a variety <strong>of</strong> attacks on popular sovereignty, including the<br />
Progressive emphasis on pr<strong>of</strong>essional governance through the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> social science as a way <strong>of</strong> transcending politics. At the same time,<br />
the unfolding <strong>of</strong> industrialization <strong>and</strong> the expansion <strong>of</strong> the American<br />
market created the need <strong>for</strong> a modern state to regulate industry <strong>and</strong><br />
commerce <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals to staff the new bureaucracies. In<br />
the end, the great Progressive dream <strong>of</strong> harnessing the new pr<strong>of</strong>essions<br />
<strong>and</strong> social sciences <strong>for</strong> the common good ultimately ushered<br />
in the “pr<strong>of</strong>essional politics paradigm”—the idea that the public<br />
must be governed by experts <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.<br />
The idea <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional politics fits much better with a liberal<br />
model <strong>of</strong> democracy than it does with the more participatory<br />
62