Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
160<br />
academic review?”—rested on the assumption that research university<br />
missions were appropriately <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>ever fixed in the penumbra <strong>of</strong><br />
(1) the German research model <strong>and</strong> Clark Kerr’s master plan division<br />
<strong>of</strong> scholarship among insoluble <strong>and</strong> separate institutions <strong>of</strong><br />
research, (2) K-12 teacher certification <strong>and</strong> terminal degrees, <strong>and</strong><br />
(3) remedial <strong>and</strong> vocational campuses or junior colleges that ironically,<br />
yet appropriately, are today referred to as community colleges.<br />
<strong>Democracy</strong> was a troubling concept. Our National Conversation<br />
did not sufficiently address it. Later, I raised the democracy<br />
question again, this time with the faculty program committee <strong>of</strong><br />
Penn State’s new public scholarship-based intercollege minor in<br />
Civic <strong>and</strong> Community Engagement. The minor’s requirements<br />
included a newly developed lower division survey course called<br />
Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Civic <strong>and</strong> Community Engagement, a capstone<br />
project, approved fieldwork in the community, <strong>and</strong> several electives<br />
individually tailored <strong>for</strong> each student with the assistance <strong>and</strong> approval<br />
<strong>of</strong> faculty mentors. Missing at the National Conversation,<br />
<strong>and</strong> when the program committee met, <strong>and</strong> in the minor’s curriculum,<br />
was a sustained consideration <strong>of</strong> democracy itself—either<br />
what it is, or how to practice it. A democracy requirement should<br />
be made explicit, I thought. I wanted our faculty to state what we<br />
wanted students to underst<strong>and</strong> about democracy <strong>and</strong> what bodies<br />
<strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> practice would best contribute to that learning.<br />
This is not a new or an original thought. CIRCLE, Campus Compact,<br />
<strong>and</strong> others sometimes distinguish between learning about<br />
democracy <strong>and</strong> learning its effective practice. Public scholarship<br />
requires both. But too <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>and</strong> intentionally or not on the part<br />
<strong>of</strong> institutions, there has been an unsupported assumption that<br />
volunteering in a community provides the knowledge <strong>and</strong> praxis<br />
necessary to sustain a complex constitutionally based democracy.<br />
The program faculty settled on requiring at least one “public<br />
issues <strong>and</strong> democracy” course. The language reads:<br />
Public Issues <strong>and</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong> Courses investigate the<br />
roles academic disciplines play in their contribution to<br />
public debate <strong>and</strong> participation in civic issues <strong>and</strong> community<br />
problem solving. Through the lens <strong>of</strong> specific<br />
academic disciplines <strong>and</strong> the examination <strong>of</strong> their civic