09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />

160<br />

academic review?”—rested on the assumption that research university<br />

missions were appropriately <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>ever fixed in the penumbra <strong>of</strong><br />

(1) the German research model <strong>and</strong> Clark Kerr’s master plan division<br />

<strong>of</strong> scholarship among insoluble <strong>and</strong> separate institutions <strong>of</strong><br />

research, (2) K-12 teacher certification <strong>and</strong> terminal degrees, <strong>and</strong><br />

(3) remedial <strong>and</strong> vocational campuses or junior colleges that ironically,<br />

yet appropriately, are today referred to as community colleges.<br />

<strong>Democracy</strong> was a troubling concept. Our National Conversation<br />

did not sufficiently address it. Later, I raised the democracy<br />

question again, this time with the faculty program committee <strong>of</strong><br />

Penn State’s new public scholarship-based intercollege minor in<br />

Civic <strong>and</strong> Community Engagement. The minor’s requirements<br />

included a newly developed lower division survey course called<br />

Fundamentals <strong>of</strong> Civic <strong>and</strong> Community Engagement, a capstone<br />

project, approved fieldwork in the community, <strong>and</strong> several electives<br />

individually tailored <strong>for</strong> each student with the assistance <strong>and</strong> approval<br />

<strong>of</strong> faculty mentors. Missing at the National Conversation,<br />

<strong>and</strong> when the program committee met, <strong>and</strong> in the minor’s curriculum,<br />

was a sustained consideration <strong>of</strong> democracy itself—either<br />

what it is, or how to practice it. A democracy requirement should<br />

be made explicit, I thought. I wanted our faculty to state what we<br />

wanted students to underst<strong>and</strong> about democracy <strong>and</strong> what bodies<br />

<strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>and</strong> practice would best contribute to that learning.<br />

This is not a new or an original thought. CIRCLE, Campus Compact,<br />

<strong>and</strong> others sometimes distinguish between learning about<br />

democracy <strong>and</strong> learning its effective practice. Public scholarship<br />

requires both. But too <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>and</strong> intentionally or not on the part<br />

<strong>of</strong> institutions, there has been an unsupported assumption that<br />

volunteering in a community provides the knowledge <strong>and</strong> praxis<br />

necessary to sustain a complex constitutionally based democracy.<br />

The program faculty settled on requiring at least one “public<br />

issues <strong>and</strong> democracy” course. The language reads:<br />

Public Issues <strong>and</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong> Courses investigate the<br />

roles academic disciplines play in their contribution to<br />

public debate <strong>and</strong> participation in civic issues <strong>and</strong> community<br />

problem solving. Through the lens <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

academic disciplines <strong>and</strong> the examination <strong>of</strong> their civic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!