Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
to build a new multiphased approach to school improvement to be<br />
put to the voters over the next several years.<br />
The first phase <strong>of</strong> the school<br />
“A better answer to<br />
American individualism<br />
than what the communitarians<br />
were saying about<br />
returning to common beliefs<br />
<strong>and</strong> values, it seemed<br />
to me, was to ground our<br />
community-building <strong>and</strong><br />
political practice on both<br />
the norms <strong>of</strong> public virtue<br />
<strong>and</strong> the practices <strong>of</strong> dialogue<br />
<strong>and</strong> deliberation.<br />
This, I believed was more<br />
appropriate to a modern,<br />
pluralistic society.”<br />
(“The Work <strong>of</strong> ‘Public-<br />
Making’: An interview<br />
with Douglas Challenger,”<br />
HEX, 2004.)<br />
board’s plan <strong>for</strong> facilities improvement<br />
was proposed in 2005 <strong>and</strong><br />
was successful at the polls. Phase<br />
two, which included a $9.45 million<br />
bond <strong>for</strong> substantial renovations<br />
to the existing high school <strong>and</strong><br />
middle school campus, also passed<br />
by a narrow margin in March 2006.<br />
It’s clear that over the past few<br />
years the Jaffrey-Rindge Cooperative<br />
School District has experienced<br />
the reversal <strong>of</strong> a long trend <strong>of</strong> deepening<br />
community conflict <strong>and</strong><br />
continual electoral defeats <strong>for</strong> increased<br />
local funding <strong>for</strong> schools.<br />
What’s more, is that even though<br />
the victories <strong>for</strong> school facilities<br />
improvements have been by narrow<br />
electoral margins, they have<br />
occurred without the same kind<br />
<strong>of</strong> divisiveness that was evidenced<br />
in the earlier years when citizens<br />
<strong>for</strong>med themselves into camps <strong>and</strong><br />
traded insults in the local newspaper<br />
<strong>and</strong> at public meetings, <strong>and</strong> the resulting gridlock obstructed<br />
any major change from occurring.<br />
Superintendent O’Neill said <strong>of</strong> the March 2006 election result,<br />
“It’s nothing but good news.” A selectman <strong>and</strong> member <strong>of</strong> the<br />
school board’s facilities <strong>and</strong> planning committee said, “The logjam<br />
<strong>of</strong> our school facilities has been broken: we can now move on <strong>and</strong><br />
fix our schools. Everyone came together <strong>and</strong> we found a compromise<br />
both communities could support.” Privately, he told Drouin<br />
that this recent electoral success <strong>for</strong> the school board had its roots<br />
194