09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />

to build a new multiphased approach to school improvement to be<br />

put to the voters over the next several years.<br />

The first phase <strong>of</strong> the school<br />

“A better answer to<br />

American individualism<br />

than what the communitarians<br />

were saying about<br />

returning to common beliefs<br />

<strong>and</strong> values, it seemed<br />

to me, was to ground our<br />

community-building <strong>and</strong><br />

political practice on both<br />

the norms <strong>of</strong> public virtue<br />

<strong>and</strong> the practices <strong>of</strong> dialogue<br />

<strong>and</strong> deliberation.<br />

This, I believed was more<br />

appropriate to a modern,<br />

pluralistic society.”<br />

(“The Work <strong>of</strong> ‘Public-<br />

Making’: An interview<br />

with Douglas Challenger,”<br />

HEX, 2004.)<br />

board’s plan <strong>for</strong> facilities improvement<br />

was proposed in 2005 <strong>and</strong><br />

was successful at the polls. Phase<br />

two, which included a $9.45 million<br />

bond <strong>for</strong> substantial renovations<br />

to the existing high school <strong>and</strong><br />

middle school campus, also passed<br />

by a narrow margin in March 2006.<br />

It’s clear that over the past few<br />

years the Jaffrey-Rindge Cooperative<br />

School District has experienced<br />

the reversal <strong>of</strong> a long trend <strong>of</strong> deepening<br />

community conflict <strong>and</strong><br />

continual electoral defeats <strong>for</strong> increased<br />

local funding <strong>for</strong> schools.<br />

What’s more, is that even though<br />

the victories <strong>for</strong> school facilities<br />

improvements have been by narrow<br />

electoral margins, they have<br />

occurred without the same kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> divisiveness that was evidenced<br />

in the earlier years when citizens<br />

<strong>for</strong>med themselves into camps <strong>and</strong><br />

traded insults in the local newspaper<br />

<strong>and</strong> at public meetings, <strong>and</strong> the resulting gridlock obstructed<br />

any major change from occurring.<br />

Superintendent O’Neill said <strong>of</strong> the March 2006 election result,<br />

“It’s nothing but good news.” A selectman <strong>and</strong> member <strong>of</strong> the<br />

school board’s facilities <strong>and</strong> planning committee said, “The logjam<br />

<strong>of</strong> our school facilities has been broken: we can now move on <strong>and</strong><br />

fix our schools. Everyone came together <strong>and</strong> we found a compromise<br />

both communities could support.” Privately, he told Drouin<br />

that this recent electoral success <strong>for</strong> the school board had its roots<br />

194

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!