Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Portrait <strong>of</strong> a <strong>University</strong><br />
meaning <strong>and</strong> public purpose, these courses contribute<br />
to student underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the democratic process <strong>and</strong><br />
the reciprocal relationship between academic <strong>and</strong> democratic<br />
practices. These courses may also promote<br />
civic <strong>and</strong> leadership skills through class deliberation<br />
<strong>and</strong> debate, as well as other classroom activities <strong>and</strong><br />
assignments.<br />
It was a compromise <strong>and</strong>, <strong>for</strong> me, a placeholder. Students can<br />
still complete our minor with little underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the Constitution<br />
<strong>and</strong> insufficient practice, making explicit connections between<br />
their academic work <strong>and</strong> their obligations as citizens. We are still<br />
working on this, however, <strong>and</strong> we are making progress.<br />
More recently, an advising session with the student leader <strong>of</strong><br />
a campus organization interested in increasing student engagement<br />
in issues <strong>of</strong> campus <strong>and</strong> pubic importance drew my attention to<br />
another democracy problem, one I think <strong>of</strong> as the neutrality trap. The<br />
student outlined plans to organize debates, to secure speakers on a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> topics, <strong>and</strong> to develop student podcasts on myriad issues.<br />
Underlying her enthusiasm was a desire to ensure that each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
initiatives would be politically neutral—in her words, “to present<br />
facts, but not just opinions.” At Penn State, <strong>and</strong> I think elsewhere,<br />
there has been a conscious ef<strong>for</strong>t to view neutral discussions as a<br />
positive attribute <strong>and</strong> political discussion as somehow outside <strong>of</strong><br />
acceptable manners, or worse. Why? Political participation has<br />
become an invitation <strong>for</strong> derision. Our students have grown up in<br />
an environment in which political practice is reduced to vitriolic<br />
name calling. Opposition to the Iraq War is characterized as cut<strong>and</strong>-run<br />
cowardice. Liberal has lost all connection to its semantic<br />
roots. The 2004 presidential election produced a new term, swiftboating,<br />
which refers to attacking the loyalty as well as the accuracy<br />
<strong>of</strong> political opponents. Both major parties, all three branches <strong>of</strong><br />
government, <strong>and</strong> certainly the mass media have helped to bring<br />
this about. So has our failure in the schools to build democratic<br />
capacity that includes deep underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the positive political<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> democracy. Certainly the Constitution <strong>and</strong> democratic<br />
theory view practices relating to the government <strong>and</strong> to the public<br />
affairs <strong>of</strong> a democracy—politics—in a more favorable light.<br />
161