Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
viewed as being only economic in nature. To borrow again from<br />
William Sullivan, such a view reflects a wholly technical underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
<strong>of</strong> what the academic pr<strong>of</strong>essionals who are employed<br />
by these colleges are about. This underst<strong>and</strong>ing is false. As I have<br />
demonstrated in this chapter, at least some <strong>of</strong> these pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
were <strong>and</strong> are about much more than this. They were <strong>and</strong> are about<br />
the pursuit <strong>of</strong> public work, ends, <strong>and</strong> ideals that are not only economic<br />
but also political, environmental, <strong>and</strong> cultural in nature.<br />
In The Sociological Imagination, which was published in 1959, C.<br />
Wright Mills argued that the “educational <strong>and</strong> the political role <strong>of</strong><br />
social science in a democracy is to help cultivate <strong>and</strong> sustain publics<br />
<strong>and</strong> individuals that are able to develop, to live with, <strong>and</strong> to act upon<br />
adequate definitions <strong>of</strong> personal <strong>and</strong> social realities.” In my work <strong>of</strong><br />
reconstructing a previously obscured tradition <strong>of</strong> public scholarship<br />
in l<strong>and</strong>-grant colleges <strong>of</strong> agriculture, I am beginning to see why <strong>and</strong><br />
how scholars in a variety <strong>of</strong> academic fields—including the natural<br />
as well as social sciences—have taken up this nontechnical educational<br />
<strong>and</strong> political role in their proactive, face-to-face engagement<br />
in public work. But I am also beginning to see what scholars are up<br />
against as they attempt to sustain this tradition into the future. Given<br />
the seemingly overwhelming power <strong>of</strong> the many disincentives <strong>and</strong><br />
challenges they face, is there any real hope <strong>of</strong> success? 21<br />
With respect to this question, listen to Nick Jordan, a natural<br />
scientist who is a full pr<strong>of</strong>essor in the Department <strong>of</strong> Agronomy<br />
<strong>and</strong> Plant Genetics at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Minnesota. In response to<br />
a question I asked him about what he <strong>and</strong> other public scholars<br />
are up against in Minnesota, he told me that “the most important<br />
challenge is that there is a rapid decline in public support <strong>for</strong> what<br />
we’re doing. It’s just very clear that we’re not getting an adequate<br />
base <strong>of</strong> financial support <strong>for</strong> what we do here.” He went on to speak<br />
<strong>of</strong> a “managed decline” in his college, the <strong>of</strong>ficial name <strong>of</strong> which is<br />
the <strong>College</strong> <strong>of</strong> Food, Agricultural, <strong>and</strong> Natural Resource Sciences. In<br />
his view, this decline is a result <strong>of</strong> the “obsolescent story” his college<br />
146<br />
21 C. W. Mills, The Sociological Imagination (New York: Ox<strong>for</strong>d <strong>University</strong> Press,<br />
1959), 192.