09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />

reflection <strong>and</strong> discussion within a pr<strong>of</strong>ession struggling to find a<br />

better public ethic.” 24<br />

A final important development in the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s was<br />

work that capitalized on diversity as an asset. Indeed, the first two<br />

editions <strong>of</strong> HEX were mainly devoted to the controversy over diversity,<br />

multiculturalism, <strong>and</strong> “political correctness” versus some notion<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Western educational canon. For instance, on the first page <strong>of</strong><br />

the very first HEX article, Carlos E. Cortés observed that the “United<br />

States has been wracked by a History War” since the 1960s. Struggles<br />

over the past had grown increasingly contentious, he argued,<br />

because the country had undergone a “Diversity Revolution.” He<br />

noted that “multicultural research, teaching, <strong>and</strong> engagement” had<br />

“moved from the margins to center stage” during the previous<br />

decade, provoking a powerful reaction. 25 In the same issue, Eric<br />

Liu (then in his early 20s) observed that his own generation had:<br />

assiduously read the signals sent out by our public institutions.<br />

Be separate. Ask <strong>for</strong> more. Classify yourselves<br />

<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong> in line <strong>for</strong> what is rightly yours.… On the other<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the spectrum, young neoconservatives have delighted<br />

in exposing the follies <strong>of</strong> the politically correct. 26<br />

Liu’s generational interpretation rings true <strong>for</strong> me, <strong>and</strong> I would<br />

cite a particular event as <strong>for</strong>mative. In 1978, four members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Supreme Court had ruled that affirmative action was unconstitutional.<br />

Four members had supported it as a way to address discrimination<br />

<strong>and</strong> reallocate scarce goods (such as places in college) to disadvantaged<br />

groups. The swing vote was Justice Powell’s; he argued that<br />

affirmative action was permissible only to promote diversity, which<br />

in turn could enhance the “robust exchange <strong>of</strong> ideas,” which was a<br />

goal “<strong>of</strong> paramount importance in the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> [a university’s]<br />

mission.” 27<br />

24 David Brown, “Public Scholarship: An interview with Jay Rosen,” Higher Education<br />

Exchange (1996): 30.<br />

25 Carlos E. Cortés, “Backing into the Future: Columbus, Cleopatra, Custer & the<br />

Diversity Revolution,” Higher Education Exchange (1994): 6-8.<br />

26 Eric Liu, “Shredding the Race Card,” Higher Education Exchange (1994): 21.<br />

27 <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Regents v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!