Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Agent</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
reflection <strong>and</strong> discussion within a pr<strong>of</strong>ession struggling to find a<br />
better public ethic.” 24<br />
A final important development in the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s was<br />
work that capitalized on diversity as an asset. Indeed, the first two<br />
editions <strong>of</strong> HEX were mainly devoted to the controversy over diversity,<br />
multiculturalism, <strong>and</strong> “political correctness” versus some notion<br />
<strong>of</strong> a Western educational canon. For instance, on the first page <strong>of</strong><br />
the very first HEX article, Carlos E. Cortés observed that the “United<br />
States has been wracked by a History War” since the 1960s. Struggles<br />
over the past had grown increasingly contentious, he argued,<br />
because the country had undergone a “Diversity Revolution.” He<br />
noted that “multicultural research, teaching, <strong>and</strong> engagement” had<br />
“moved from the margins to center stage” during the previous<br />
decade, provoking a powerful reaction. 25 In the same issue, Eric<br />
Liu (then in his early 20s) observed that his own generation had:<br />
assiduously read the signals sent out by our public institutions.<br />
Be separate. Ask <strong>for</strong> more. Classify yourselves<br />
<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong> in line <strong>for</strong> what is rightly yours.… On the other<br />
side <strong>of</strong> the spectrum, young neoconservatives have delighted<br />
in exposing the follies <strong>of</strong> the politically correct. 26<br />
Liu’s generational interpretation rings true <strong>for</strong> me, <strong>and</strong> I would<br />
cite a particular event as <strong>for</strong>mative. In 1978, four members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Supreme Court had ruled that affirmative action was unconstitutional.<br />
Four members had supported it as a way to address discrimination<br />
<strong>and</strong> reallocate scarce goods (such as places in college) to disadvantaged<br />
groups. The swing vote was Justice Powell’s; he argued that<br />
affirmative action was permissible only to promote diversity, which<br />
in turn could enhance the “robust exchange <strong>of</strong> ideas,” which was a<br />
goal “<strong>of</strong> paramount importance in the fulfillment <strong>of</strong> [a university’s]<br />
mission.” 27<br />
24 David Brown, “Public Scholarship: An interview with Jay Rosen,” Higher Education<br />
Exchange (1996): 30.<br />
25 Carlos E. Cortés, “Backing into the Future: Columbus, Cleopatra, Custer & the<br />
Diversity Revolution,” Higher Education Exchange (1994): 6-8.<br />
26 Eric Liu, “Shredding the Race Card,” Higher Education Exchange (1994): 21.<br />
27 <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Regents v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978).<br />
24