09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Why This Book?<br />

to the HEX book underway, <strong>and</strong> he readily agreed, seeing his work<br />

with Kettering as contributing to his work <strong>and</strong> commitment at<br />

Penn State.<br />

In his piece, Cohen ranges beyond the Penn State story to put<br />

it in the larger context <strong>of</strong> American constitutional history <strong>and</strong> argues<br />

<strong>for</strong> “purposeful democratic learning,” that is, “learning to be democratic.”<br />

He thinks, “We have failed as educators to fully grasp the<br />

fact that nothing about democracy, not its theory <strong>and</strong> certainly not<br />

its practice, is hard wired into anyone.” The story then at Penn State<br />

seeks to remedy this “failure.”<br />

Chapter Five—Public Making<br />

There was no better person to discuss democratic deliberation<br />

than Noëlle McAfee, visiting associate pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> philosophy at<br />

George Mason <strong>University</strong>, who has worked closely with Kettering<br />

<strong>and</strong> others to make such a practice take hold in various jurisdictions.<br />

In fact, having the book’s contributors deliberate together in workshops<br />

over two years could have been McAfee’s idea in the first<br />

place. We were sure that we needed her <strong>for</strong> such an undertaking,<br />

which, to borrow David Mathews’ observation about democracy<br />

itself, was to be “more a journey than a destination.”<br />

For the book, we asked McAfee to <strong>of</strong>fer her perspective on the<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> higher education institutions <strong>for</strong> “public making,” or<br />

“public building” as some put it. She resisted any “model” <strong>for</strong> such<br />

institutions that has them “organize” others, which can too easily<br />

resort to the hierarchical relationship between expert <strong>and</strong> public. She<br />

insisted that only citizens through their own democratic deliberation<br />

<strong>and</strong> public work can become a “public.” McAfee believes, however,<br />

that academic institutions can be an important “ally” through their<br />

“research <strong>and</strong> teaching with a newfound respect <strong>for</strong> public work.”<br />

As she put it at the concluding workshop, “ally” fits her preference<br />

<strong>for</strong> “horizontal” relationships <strong>and</strong> makes it more “HEXish.”<br />

The perspective <strong>of</strong> public making needed an institutional story<br />

to ground it <strong>and</strong> Doug Challenger, associate pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> sociology<br />

at Franklin Pierce <strong>University</strong>, has certainly lived that perspective in<br />

the work <strong>of</strong> the college allied with the community <strong>of</strong> Rindge, New<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!