Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Why This Book?<br />
to the HEX book underway, <strong>and</strong> he readily agreed, seeing his work<br />
with Kettering as contributing to his work <strong>and</strong> commitment at<br />
Penn State.<br />
In his piece, Cohen ranges beyond the Penn State story to put<br />
it in the larger context <strong>of</strong> American constitutional history <strong>and</strong> argues<br />
<strong>for</strong> “purposeful democratic learning,” that is, “learning to be democratic.”<br />
He thinks, “We have failed as educators to fully grasp the<br />
fact that nothing about democracy, not its theory <strong>and</strong> certainly not<br />
its practice, is hard wired into anyone.” The story then at Penn State<br />
seeks to remedy this “failure.”<br />
Chapter Five—Public Making<br />
There was no better person to discuss democratic deliberation<br />
than Noëlle McAfee, visiting associate pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> philosophy at<br />
George Mason <strong>University</strong>, who has worked closely with Kettering<br />
<strong>and</strong> others to make such a practice take hold in various jurisdictions.<br />
In fact, having the book’s contributors deliberate together in workshops<br />
over two years could have been McAfee’s idea in the first<br />
place. We were sure that we needed her <strong>for</strong> such an undertaking,<br />
which, to borrow David Mathews’ observation about democracy<br />
itself, was to be “more a journey than a destination.”<br />
For the book, we asked McAfee to <strong>of</strong>fer her perspective on the<br />
potential <strong>of</strong> higher education institutions <strong>for</strong> “public making,” or<br />
“public building” as some put it. She resisted any “model” <strong>for</strong> such<br />
institutions that has them “organize” others, which can too easily<br />
resort to the hierarchical relationship between expert <strong>and</strong> public. She<br />
insisted that only citizens through their own democratic deliberation<br />
<strong>and</strong> public work can become a “public.” McAfee believes, however,<br />
that academic institutions can be an important “ally” through their<br />
“research <strong>and</strong> teaching with a newfound respect <strong>for</strong> public work.”<br />
As she put it at the concluding workshop, “ally” fits her preference<br />
<strong>for</strong> “horizontal” relationships <strong>and</strong> makes it more “HEXish.”<br />
The perspective <strong>of</strong> public making needed an institutional story<br />
to ground it <strong>and</strong> Doug Challenger, associate pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> sociology<br />
at Franklin Pierce <strong>University</strong>, has certainly lived that perspective in<br />
the work <strong>of</strong> the college allied with the community <strong>of</strong> Rindge, New<br />
7