09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Engaged <strong>University</strong><br />

Because Powell’s opinion was the law <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong> after 1978,<br />

<strong>and</strong> because there were good substantive reasons <strong>for</strong> it, many<br />

colleges <strong>and</strong> universities began to see affirmative action (broadly<br />

defined as any ef<strong>for</strong>t to encourage the participation <strong>of</strong> women <strong>and</strong><br />

minorities) as essential to their scholarly <strong>and</strong> educational missions.<br />

Meanwhile, surveys found that young people increasingly saw<br />

racial diversity as an asset. As Liu noted, “the twentysomething<br />

generation is still key, as confused as we may be now. We are the<br />

first American generation to have been born in an integrated society,<br />

<strong>and</strong> we are accustomed to more race-mixing than any generation<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e us.” 28<br />

If there is a common theme to the 13 articles on diversity in<br />

the 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1995 HEX issues, it is the search <strong>for</strong> a positive vision.<br />

Often, multiculturalism has a consumerist feel. One assumes that<br />

there is a finite supply <strong>of</strong> cultural goods, each marked with a gender<br />

<strong>and</strong> ethnic tag; the question is how much <strong>of</strong> students’ finite time<br />

should be spent consuming “Western” products, versus works <strong>of</strong><br />

their own choice, versus assigned works by previously excluded<br />

groups. I see the early HEX authors as struggling <strong>for</strong> a positive,<br />

“win-win” vision in which new generations can not merely consume<br />

but also create works that exp<strong>and</strong> the cultural commons, either by<br />

combining multiple cultural influences (see John Lahr’s review <strong>of</strong><br />

Anna Deveare Smith in the inaugural HEX), or by creating cultural<br />

groups on campus that give students a sense that they “matter” (as<br />

Daryl G. Smith argued), or by adding “new voices along with the<br />

old” (as Cortés recommended).<br />

When students are encouraged to create culturally diverse<br />

products <strong>and</strong> contribute them to the commons, they join a tradition<br />

<strong>of</strong> democratic activism that connects politics closely to culture <strong>and</strong><br />

sees citizens as creators. As Harry Boyte shows in this volume, cultural<br />

politics was the tradition <strong>of</strong> Hull House in the 1890s, the<br />

Popular Front in the 1930s, <strong>and</strong> the Freedom Movement in the 1960s.<br />

It remains essential in some contemporary community organizing<br />

work, especially that <strong>of</strong> the Industrial Areas Foundation <strong>and</strong> the<br />

28 Liu, “Shredding the Race Card,” 22.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!