09.02.2014 Views

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Makings <strong>of</strong> a Public <strong>and</strong><br />

the Role <strong>of</strong> the Academy<br />

Noëlle McAfee<br />

For more than a decade, those embarking on public scholarship<br />

<strong>and</strong> those rethinking the civic mission <strong>of</strong> the university have<br />

been asking, what kind <strong>of</strong> relationship should there be between the<br />

academy <strong>and</strong> the public? This is much bigger than the old town/<br />

gown problem. It is more than a matter <strong>of</strong> building good public<br />

relations. And the closer one looks at it the more complex this<br />

“relationship” becomes. We are not asking about the relationship<br />

between one thing <strong>and</strong> another thing, <strong>for</strong> neither the academy nor<br />

the public is a thing. The academy is not only spread out all over<br />

the world, not only a loose unfederated array <strong>of</strong> institutional <strong>and</strong><br />

scholarly inquiries with a mission to teach, to learn, <strong>and</strong> to serve;<br />

it is a frame <strong>of</strong> mind, a way <strong>of</strong> relating to the world as it is, <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten situated in something like a hierarchical relationship to all it<br />

studies <strong>and</strong> to whom it teaches.<br />

But what is even more intriguing <strong>and</strong> baffling is this non-thing<br />

we call “the public”: most always with the definite article, the public.<br />

To use the term publics, as some with multicultural sensibilities<br />

sometimes do, is to twist the word beyond recognition, <strong>for</strong> the word<br />

public seems designed to connote a collectivity, really an ubercollectivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> members <strong>of</strong> a political community (at whatever scale); <strong>and</strong> if<br />

there is more than one collectivity, then any one <strong>of</strong> them isn’t a collectivity<br />

or a public at all. Instead <strong>of</strong> a public, we might call it a faction.<br />

I say the public, whatever it is, is not a thing. By that I mean that<br />

it is not waiting in the wings. It is ephemeral. It comes together one<br />

day, it seems, <strong>and</strong> disperses the next. A public is always in relation<br />

to something else, whether a problem that can, upon recognition,<br />

b<strong>and</strong> people together, or a cultural production, or a speech. Yet with<br />

speeches <strong>and</strong> cultural productions, “a public” seems to mean anyone<br />

paying attention, <strong>and</strong> it calls <strong>for</strong> little more than paying attention.<br />

That’s what we call an audience, not a public.<br />

173

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!