Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Engaged <strong>University</strong><br />
The shift that I am describing was ideological. Cooper, Royce,<br />
<strong>and</strong> other contributors to HEX made points incompatible with<br />
Marxist <strong>and</strong> postmodernist political theories. They were eager to<br />
strengthen <strong>and</strong> enhance existing <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> democratic politics <strong>and</strong> recover<br />
local traditions. They were also inclined to listen to what their<br />
fellow citizens were saying, instead <strong>of</strong> suspecting that other people<br />
had been manipulated by capitalism, advertising, or politicians to<br />
adopt positions contrary to justice <strong>and</strong> their own interests. They<br />
rejected the “hermeneutics <strong>of</strong> suspicion,” in Paul Ricoeur’s phrase.<br />
When HEX was founded, less than one in five Americans<br />
identified themselves as “liberals” in the National Election Studies<br />
poll, compared to 35 to 40 percent who called themselves “conservatives.”<br />
(That remained the ratio in 2004.) There<strong>for</strong>e, academics who<br />
held open-ended discussions with their fellow Americans had to<br />
listen to a lot <strong>of</strong> arguments <strong>and</strong><br />
premises associated with the political<br />
right. Pr<strong>of</strong>essors who believed<br />
in open-ended deliberation might<br />
disagree with these conservative<br />
opinions, but they couldn’t dismiss<br />
them or bypass them. The fundamental<br />
premise <strong>of</strong> deliberative<br />
politics is that one ought to take<br />
other people’s beliefs <strong>and</strong> opinions<br />
seriously <strong>and</strong> treat them with<br />
respect. If average Americans<br />
deserved to be listened to, <strong>and</strong> if<br />
a plurality voted <strong>for</strong> conservative<br />
politicians <strong>and</strong> causes, then the ascendancy<br />
<strong>of</strong> the right could not be<br />
“I think it should<br />
be pointed out that the<br />
culture <strong>of</strong> American<br />
universities is not<br />
uni<strong>for</strong>m; rather, it is<br />
passionately contested.”<br />
(“What Is ‘Public’ About<br />
What Academics Do?:<br />
An exchange with Robert<br />
Kingston <strong>and</strong> Peter Levine,”<br />
HEX, 2004.)<br />
dismissed as the result <strong>of</strong> nefarious tactics by elites (e.g., campaign<br />
donations, media manipulation, <strong>and</strong> the like.) It had to be treated as<br />
a legitimate popular movement <strong>and</strong> the authentic point from which<br />
many Americans entered conversations.<br />
Nevertheless, the new civic politics was not itself right-<strong>of</strong>center,<br />
or moderate, or otherwise easy to categorize ideologically.<br />
15