Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
Agent of Democracy - Society for College and University Planning
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Portrait <strong>of</strong> a <strong>University</strong><br />
the Philadelphia Convention,” Marshall said.<br />
Nor do I find the wisdom, <strong>for</strong>esight <strong>and</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> justice<br />
exhibited by the framers particularly pr<strong>of</strong>ound. To the<br />
contrary, the government they devised was defective from<br />
the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war <strong>and</strong><br />
momentous social trans<strong>for</strong>mation to attain the system <strong>of</strong><br />
constitutional government, <strong>and</strong> its respect <strong>for</strong> the individual<br />
freedoms <strong>and</strong> human rights we hold as fundamental<br />
today.<br />
For us, a trans<strong>for</strong>mative question has been: are the pedagogical <strong>and</strong><br />
policy tenets <strong>of</strong> service learning <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-grant service sufficient to<br />
provide a democratic capacity keystone?<br />
Madison’s emphasis on education as a means to build democratic<br />
capacity, <strong>and</strong> Marshall’s acknowledgement <strong>of</strong> the American democracy’s<br />
trans<strong>for</strong>mational needs are useful academy reminders. The<br />
North American revolutionaries were willing to challenge the status<br />
quo <strong>and</strong> to risk what early modern English writers, including advocates<br />
<strong>of</strong> individual liberty, such as John Milton <strong>and</strong> John Locke, were<br />
not: Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, <strong>and</strong> others<br />
did not fear We the People <strong>and</strong> hence did not fear the public sovereignty<br />
<strong>of</strong> democracy. They were willing to experiment. They recognized that<br />
only a delicate balance <strong>of</strong> structural government balanced by the<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> the public to govern held out the pragmatic promise <strong>of</strong><br />
sustainable liberty.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the roots <strong>of</strong> Penn State’s take on public scholarship are<br />
in the service ideals <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>and</strong>-grant mission. The service-learning<br />
movement has been an entry portal <strong>for</strong> others. But these gateways<br />
are proving insufficient to sustain interests that go beyond direct social<br />
service. The denial <strong>of</strong> tenure to junior faculty who have focused on<br />
service <strong>and</strong> the common practice <strong>of</strong> rooting service learning in student<br />
affairs rather than scholarly traditions have proven to be dysfunctional<br />
conditions <strong>for</strong> scholars drawn to academic careers by the value—<strong>and</strong><br />
values <strong>of</strong>—scholarship itself. Where is the scholarship in service, they<br />
ask? How can volunteerism replace the academic foundations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sciences, arts, <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essions? Where is the purposeful democratic<br />
learning in the l<strong>and</strong>-grant? The lack <strong>of</strong> direct connection between<br />
sustaining democratic ideals <strong>and</strong> the direct service <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>-grant <strong>and</strong><br />
155