14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Basic Science XII. Instrumentation and Methodology<br />

mood scale scores. The current study assessed the reliability of a mood<br />

measure with and without sleep-related items.<br />

Methods: Online surveys querying mood, workload (e.g., exams,<br />

homework), and medication use during the two weeks prior were presented<br />

once biweekly after weeks 2, 6, 8, and 10 during the first semester<br />

of college; the survey was presented on 2 consecutive days after weeks<br />

4 and 12. Analyses included 178 Brown University first-year students<br />

(mean surveys completed=5.41). Ages were 18-21 years (mean=18.1),<br />

and 108 were females.<br />

Results: The reliability of a 6-item depressed mood scale (Kandell &<br />

Davies, Archives of General Psychiatry, 1982) was examined as 1) full<br />

scale; 2) full scale excluding an item assessing difficulties falling and<br />

staying asleep; and 3) full scale excluding the sleep difficulty item and<br />

a “tiredness” item. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were computed for<br />

consecutive-day assessments and separately for the 6 biweekly surveys.<br />

The reliability estimates (ICC) across biweekly assessments ranged<br />

from .65-.68, .64-.68, and .63-.67 for the 3 “scales,” respectively. Thus,<br />

the ICC values for repeated assessments administered over 2+ weeks<br />

were stable and not a function of the particular weeks compared. Time<br />

between repeated assessments, however, was important as indicated by<br />

the ICC values for the 3 “scales” on day-to-day administrations, which<br />

were .91, .92, and .91 for week 4 and .88, .87, and .88 for week 12.<br />

Conclusion: This analysis indicates stability in participant responses on<br />

a mood questionnaire with or without sleep and tiredness items across<br />

consecutive-day and bi-weekly administrations.<br />

Support (If Any): Support received from the National Institute of Mental<br />

Health (MH079179). Dr. Raffray received support from the European<br />

Sleep Center, Paris France and l’Institut Servier, Neuilly-sur-Seine,<br />

France.<br />

0323<br />

VALIDATION OF URDU VERSION OF THE EPWORTH<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>INESS SCALE<br />

Surani A 2 , Mattewal AS 1 , Ramar K 3 , Surani A 2 , Khaliqdina JS 2 ,<br />

Subramanian S 1 , Surani S 1,4<br />

1<br />

Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Pearland, TX, USA,<br />

2<br />

Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, 3 Mayo Clinic,<br />

Rochester, MN, USA, 4 Internal Medicine, Texas A&M University,<br />

Corpus Christi, TX, USA<br />

Introduction: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire<br />

widely used in English speaking countries for assessment of subjective<br />

daytime sleepiness. Our purpose was to translate and validate the ESS<br />

for use in Urdu -speaking countries.<br />

Methods: The original ESS was translated into the Urdu version (ESS-<br />

Ur) in three phases- translation and back translation, committee based<br />

translation, and testing in bilingual individuals, before final approval<br />

of the ESS- Urdu version. Subsequently, a prospective study was performed<br />

in 89 healthy bilingual subjects to assess the validity of the ESS-<br />

Ur version compared to the original ESS in the English version.<br />

Results: Both English and Urdu versions of the ESS were administered<br />

to eighty nine subjects (67% women and 33% men). The mean composite<br />

Epworth score was 7.53 in English language and 7.7 in the ESS-Ur<br />

(p=.76). The ESS-Ur was highly correlated with the Epworth-English<br />

Sleepiness scale (rho=.938, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!