SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement
SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement
SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A. Basic Science XII. Instrumentation and Methodology<br />
mood scale scores. The current study assessed the reliability of a mood<br />
measure with and without sleep-related items.<br />
Methods: Online surveys querying mood, workload (e.g., exams,<br />
homework), and medication use during the two weeks prior were presented<br />
once biweekly after weeks 2, 6, 8, and 10 during the first semester<br />
of college; the survey was presented on 2 consecutive days after weeks<br />
4 and 12. Analyses included 178 Brown University first-year students<br />
(mean surveys completed=5.41). Ages were 18-21 years (mean=18.1),<br />
and 108 were females.<br />
Results: The reliability of a 6-item depressed mood scale (Kandell &<br />
Davies, Archives of General Psychiatry, 1982) was examined as 1) full<br />
scale; 2) full scale excluding an item assessing difficulties falling and<br />
staying asleep; and 3) full scale excluding the sleep difficulty item and<br />
a “tiredness” item. Intraclass correlations (ICC) were computed for<br />
consecutive-day assessments and separately for the 6 biweekly surveys.<br />
The reliability estimates (ICC) across biweekly assessments ranged<br />
from .65-.68, .64-.68, and .63-.67 for the 3 “scales,” respectively. Thus,<br />
the ICC values for repeated assessments administered over 2+ weeks<br />
were stable and not a function of the particular weeks compared. Time<br />
between repeated assessments, however, was important as indicated by<br />
the ICC values for the 3 “scales” on day-to-day administrations, which<br />
were .91, .92, and .91 for week 4 and .88, .87, and .88 for week 12.<br />
Conclusion: This analysis indicates stability in participant responses on<br />
a mood questionnaire with or without sleep and tiredness items across<br />
consecutive-day and bi-weekly administrations.<br />
Support (If Any): Support received from the National Institute of Mental<br />
Health (MH079179). Dr. Raffray received support from the European<br />
Sleep Center, Paris France and l’Institut Servier, Neuilly-sur-Seine,<br />
France.<br />
0323<br />
VALIDATION OF URDU VERSION OF THE EPWORTH<br />
<strong>SLEEP</strong>INESS SCALE<br />
Surani A 2 , Mattewal AS 1 , Ramar K 3 , Surani A 2 , Khaliqdina JS 2 ,<br />
Subramanian S 1 , Surani S 1,4<br />
1<br />
Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Pearland, TX, USA,<br />
2<br />
Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, 3 Mayo Clinic,<br />
Rochester, MN, USA, 4 Internal Medicine, Texas A&M University,<br />
Corpus Christi, TX, USA<br />
Introduction: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is a questionnaire<br />
widely used in English speaking countries for assessment of subjective<br />
daytime sleepiness. Our purpose was to translate and validate the ESS<br />
for use in Urdu -speaking countries.<br />
Methods: The original ESS was translated into the Urdu version (ESS-<br />
Ur) in three phases- translation and back translation, committee based<br />
translation, and testing in bilingual individuals, before final approval<br />
of the ESS- Urdu version. Subsequently, a prospective study was performed<br />
in 89 healthy bilingual subjects to assess the validity of the ESS-<br />
Ur version compared to the original ESS in the English version.<br />
Results: Both English and Urdu versions of the ESS were administered<br />
to eighty nine subjects (67% women and 33% men). The mean composite<br />
Epworth score was 7.53 in English language and 7.7 in the ESS-Ur<br />
(p=.76). The ESS-Ur was highly correlated with the Epworth-English<br />
Sleepiness scale (rho=.938, p