14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. Clinical Sleep Science XV. Healthcare Services, Research and Education<br />

0978<br />

IMPACT OF EXTENDED-DURATION SHIFTS ON MOTOR<br />

VEHICLE CRASHES, MEDICAL ERRORS AND ADVERSE<br />

EVENTS IN PGY 2-7 RESIDENT PHYSICIANS<br />

Barger L 1,2 , Abaluck BK 1,2 , Abaluck JT 3 , Landrigan CP 1,2,4 ,<br />

Czeisler CA 1,2<br />

1<br />

Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,<br />

2<br />

Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston,<br />

MA, USA, 3 Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of<br />

Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 4 Department of Pediatrics,<br />

Children’s Hospital of Boston, Boston, MA, USA<br />

Introduction: The Harvard Work Hours, Health and Safety Group has<br />

established that extended-duration (greater than or equal to 24 hours)<br />

work shifts, which have been a hallmark of medical education, are associated<br />

with higher risks of motor vehicle crashes, medical errors and<br />

adverse events among resident physicians in postgraduate year one<br />

(PGY-1). Here we report these safety outcomes in resident physicians in<br />

postgraduate years 2-7 (PGY 2-7).<br />

Methods: We conducted a nationwide web-based survey over 5 years<br />

and gathered 13,737 person-months of data from PGY 2-7 resident physicians.<br />

94% of these data were collected following the introduction of<br />

work-hour guidelines established by the Accreditation Council for Graduate<br />

Medical Education (ACGME) in July, 2003.<br />

Results: In 46% of person-months, PGY 2-7 physicians reported their<br />

longest work shift was greater than or equal to 24 hours. The risk of a<br />

reported motor vehicle crash and near-miss incident was significantly<br />

increased after an extended duration work shift as compared with a<br />

shift that was not of extended duration (OR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.01-2.90<br />

and OR: 5.13; 95% CI: 4.40-5.96, respectively). The risk of reporting a<br />

fatigue-related error was significantly increased in months including 1-4<br />

extended shifts (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.27-2.47) or 5 or more extended<br />

shifts (OR: 5.2; 95% CI: 3.79-7.1), as compared to months including<br />

no extended shifts. Risk of reporting a fatigue-related adverse events in<br />

which a patient was injured was significantly increased in months including<br />

1-4 extended shifts (OR: 2.53; 95% CI: 1.02-6.25) or 5 or more<br />

extended shifts (OR: 3.36; 95% CI: 1.52-7.41), as compared to months<br />

including no extended shifts.<br />

Conclusion: Extended duration work shifts are a major risk factor for<br />

PGY 2-7 resident physicians and their patients. These data suggest that<br />

the ACGME should consider extending its recently-announced 16-hour<br />

work-hour limit for PGY1 resident physicians to PGY2-7 resident physicians<br />

as well.<br />

0979<br />

THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR AS A PREDICTOR OF<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong> HYGIENE AND <strong>SLEEP</strong> QUALITY<br />

von Linden MI 1,2 , Powell ED 3 , Muehlbach MJ 3 , Ojile JM 3<br />

1<br />

Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO,<br />

USA, 2 Carl T Hayden VA Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 3 Clayton<br />

Sleep Institute, St. Louis, MO, USA<br />

Introduction: The theory of planned behavior (TPB) suggests the importance<br />

of three independent considerations: attitude or value regarding<br />

the importance of sleep, perceptions of subjective norms or social<br />

support, and perceived behavioral control or self-efficacy. These considerations<br />

may be factors related to sleep hygiene behaviors and sleep<br />

quality. The objective of the present study was to examine associations<br />

among sleep hygiene and quality with public attitudes regarding the importance<br />

of sleep, perceived social support, and levels of health selfefficacy.<br />

Methods: Men and women primarily from a Midwest metropolitan area<br />

and between the ages of 18-65 years completed an online survey. The<br />

survey included demographics, sleep hygiene (SH) measure, Pittsburgh<br />

Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Health Associations Scale (HAS), Value<br />

on Health Scale (VHS), Social Support Scale, and the Perceived Health<br />

Competence Scale (PHCS). The HAS assesses health attitude by associating<br />

health indicators with outcomes. Measures related to the components<br />

of TPB were regressed on sleep hygiene and quality measures.<br />

Results: A total of 232 surveys were completed. Of the eight health indicators<br />

on the HAS, poor sleep was on average the fourth most significant<br />

(rank 1-8, mean rank = 4.26), behind stress, diet, and exercise. The<br />

health outcome of insomnia ranked sixth of nine outcomes (rank 1-9,<br />

mean rank = 6.15), suggesting poor sleep does not rank high according<br />

to personal importance of health outcomes. Using a stepwise regression,<br />

the VHS (F= 21.25, p< .001), the PHCS (F= 15.08, p< .001), and the<br />

HAS Sleep item (F= 11.74, p< .001) all entered the model to predict<br />

sleep hygiene and accounted for 14% of the variance. For sleep quality,<br />

only the PHCS entered the model (F= 18.83, p< .001) and accounted for<br />

8% of the variance.<br />

Conclusion: As measured by the HAS, attitudes about health indicators<br />

and outcomes generally undervalue sleep as a leading cause of negative<br />

health outcomes. Lower value placed on one’s health and lower health<br />

competency are predictive factors of poor sleep behaviors. Whereas individuals<br />

with higher perceived health competence predict better sleep<br />

quality. Applying the TPB may be a useful tool in designing interventions<br />

to promote better sleep habits and quality.<br />

0980<br />

AN INTERNET BASED EDUCATION PROGRAM IMPROVES<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong> LITERACY IN COLLEGE PSYCHOLOGY STUDENTS<br />

Quan SF 1,2 , Anderson JL 1,2,3 , Hodge GK 3<br />

1<br />

Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,<br />

USA, 2 Sleep Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA,<br />

USA, 3 Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM,<br />

USA<br />

Introduction: Knowledge regarding the importance of sleep in health<br />

and performance, and good sleep hygiene practices is low, especially<br />

among adolescents and young adults. Introductory psychology is one of<br />

the most highly enrolled courses at colleges and universities. This study<br />

tested the impact of an internet-based learning module on improving<br />

sleep literacy in this venue.<br />

Methods: An internet-based learning module containing sleep physiology<br />

and hygiene information was developed using content from the<br />

Harvard Medical School sleep educational website http://www.understandingsleep.org.<br />

Access to the module was provided as an extra credit<br />

activity for 2 of 4 sections (Experimental, N=889) of an introductory<br />

college psychology course during their standard instruction on sleep and<br />

dreaming. The remaining 2 sections (Control, N=878) were encouraged<br />

to visit only the website. Level of knowledge was assessed before and<br />

after access to the module or website, and just before the final examination.<br />

Results: 354 in the Experimental and 253 in the Control groups participated<br />

in the extra credit activity. Pretesting showed equivalency in sleep<br />

knowledge between the 2 groups (Experimental: 17.7 +/- 3.9 [sd]; Control:<br />

18.1 +/- 3.1, p=ns). At the end of standard instruction, the Experimental<br />

group improved their sleep knowledge while the Control group’s<br />

scores did not change (23.9 +/- 4.3 vs. 18.4 +/- 3.9, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!