SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement
SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement
SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
B. Clinical Sleep Science I. Sleep Disorders – Breathing<br />
0384<br />
POLYSOMNOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF nREM<br />
CYCLIC ALTERNATING PATTERN (CAP) <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />
MICROARCHITECTURE IN COMPLEX AND OBSTRUCTIVE<br />
<strong>SLEEP</strong> APNEA SYNDROMES<br />
Junna M 1 , St. Louis EK 1 , Dennhardt J 1,2 , Christner M 1,3 , Dresow MW 1 ,<br />
Dueffert LG 1 , Shepard P 1,3 , Westholm H 1,3 , Morgenthaler TI 1<br />
1<br />
Center for Sleep Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Internal<br />
Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA,<br />
2<br />
University of Memphis School of Medicine, Memphis, TN, USA, 3 St.<br />
Olaf College, Northfield, MN, USA<br />
Introduction: Complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS) presumably<br />
involves unstable ventilatory control mechanisms, possibly including<br />
cortical brain arousal indexed by NREM cyclic alternating pattern<br />
(CAP) sleep microarchitecture. CompSAS has been associated with<br />
opiate use, but may also be idiopathic or associated with underlying cardiac<br />
disease. We aimed to determine whether CAP sleep rates differed<br />
between CompSAS subgroups (opiate users (OU) and non-opiate users<br />
(NOU)) and non-opiate user OSA controls.<br />
Methods: 34 consecutive CompSAS patients (12 OU, 22 NOU) and<br />
18 OSA controls matched for age, sex, BMI, and AHI were manually<br />
analyzed for CAP sleep rate during diagnostic polysomnography using<br />
Hypnolab scoring software (Verona, Italy). CAP sleep rate during diagnostic<br />
polysomnography in all patients was obtained. Group averages<br />
were compared utilizing Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests in JMP (Chicago,<br />
IL).<br />
Results: CAP rate was significantly lower in CompSAS OU vs. NOU<br />
(62.1 vs. 79.3, p=0.01), and lower in CompSAS OU than OSA controls<br />
(62.1 vs. 74.0, p=0.079). There was no significant difference between<br />
CompSAS NOU and OSA controls.<br />
Conclusion: CompSAS OU had a significantly lower CAP rate than<br />
NOU, and OU also trended toward a lower CAP rate than non-opiate<br />
user OSA controls. Since CAP sleep microarchitecture may reflect cortical<br />
infraslow oscillations, our findings suggest that cortical mechanisms<br />
associated with unstable ventilatory effort in CompSAS and OSA are<br />
similar, but that opiate use may induce central apnea through a different,<br />
likely subcortical mechanism. Further analysis of CompSAS patients<br />
including co-morbid cardiac disease influences may further clarify differences<br />
in cortical arousal potential for central apnea.<br />
0385<br />
IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN CONTINUOUS POSITIVE<br />
AIRWAY PRESSURE REQUIREMENT OR DISEASE<br />
CONTROL BETWEEN NASAL AND ORONASAL MASKS IN<br />
THE TREATMENT OF OBSTRUCTIVE <strong>SLEEP</strong> APNEA?<br />
Bakker JP, Neill A, Campbell A<br />
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New<br />
Zealand<br />
Introduction: The aim of this randomized controlled pilot trial was to<br />
investigate whether there is a difference in continuous positive airway<br />
pressure (CPAP) requirement or residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)<br />
between nasal and oronasal masks.<br />
Methods: Adult patients (≥25 years) with severe obstructive sleep apnea<br />
(OSA) established on CPAP using a nasal mask within the previous<br />
three years were recruited. All were fitted with two oronasal masks (A<br />
and B) in addition to their own nasal mask, and were excluded if leak<br />
was >20 liters/minute at 8cmH2O while awake. Patients were randomized<br />
to CPAP at manually-titrated pressure, or auto-adjusting positive<br />
airway pressure (APAP) for seven nights each, with immediate crossover.<br />
Within each week, the two oronasal masks were used for two<br />
nights each and the nasal mask for three nights, in random order.<br />
Results: Twelve patients (mean±SD body mass index 37.7±5.0 kg/m2,<br />
AHI 59.8±28.6 events/hour, CPAP 11.1±3.2 cmH2O) consented to the<br />
study. There was no significant difference in APAP 95th percentile pressure<br />
between the three mask types (mean±SD 11.6±2.8, 11.5±3.7 and<br />
11.6±3.2 cmH2O for nasal, oronasal A and oronasal B masks respectively,<br />
p=0.66). Six and five patients demonstrated a 95th percentile pressure<br />
difference of >1cmH2O with oronasal masks A and B respectively,<br />
compared with the nasal mask. The difference in 95th percentile pressure<br />
requirement was not strongly correlated with the difference in 95th<br />
percentile leak (nasal vs. oronasal A r=-0.36, p=0.12; nasal vs. oronasal<br />
B r=-0.29, p=0.18). The machine-interpreted residual AHI during CPAP<br />
use was significantly difference between the masks (mean±SD 1.3±1.5,<br />
4.4±8.1 and 2.7±2.5 events/hour for nasal, oronasal A and oronasal B<br />
masks respectively, p=0.03).<br />
Conclusion: This pilot randomized controlled trial found variation in<br />
pressure requirement between nasal and oronasal masks but was not statistically<br />
significant. This should be further investigated in an adequately<br />
powered trial.<br />
0386<br />
CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF EFFECTIVE CONTINUOUS<br />
POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH<br />
OBSTRUCTIVE <strong>SLEEP</strong> APNEA/HYPOPNEA SYNDROME<br />
Lin H 1 , Friedman M 2<br />
1<br />
Dept. of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung<br />
Medical Center, Fong Shang City, Taiwan, 2 Otolaryngology, Rush<br />
University & Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL,<br />
USA<br />
Introduction: To identify standard clinical parameters that may predict<br />
the optimal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with<br />
obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) in Taiwanese.<br />
Methods: One hundred twenty-nine OSAHS patients who underwent<br />
a completed physical examination, successful manual CPAP titration<br />
were included in this study. We recorded the severity of nasal obstruction,<br />
modified Mallampati grade (aka updated Friedman’s tongue position<br />
(uFTP)), tonsil size, neck circumference and body mass index<br />
(BMI) and measured thyroid-mental distance and hyoid-mental distance<br />
(HMD) in the study population.<br />
Results: When the physical parameters were correlated singly with the<br />
optimal CPAP, we found that uFTP, HMD and apnea/hypopnea index<br />
(AHI) were reliable predictors of OSA (P = 0.013, P = 0.002, P = 0.000,<br />
by Multiple Regression). When all important factors were considered in<br />
a stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, a significant correlation<br />
with optimal CPAP was formulated by factoring the uFTP, HMD and<br />
AHI (Optimal CPAP = 1.01 uFTP + 0.74 HMD + 0.059 AHI - 1.603).<br />
Conclusion: This study has distinguished the correlation between updated<br />
Friedman’s tongue position, hyoid-mental distance, and AHI with<br />
the optimal CPAP. The structure of upper airway (esp. tongue base obstruction)<br />
and disease severity may predict the level of optimal CPAP.<br />
0387<br />
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT APNEA-HYPOPNEA<br />
INDEX (ET-AHI): A NEW METHOD TO ASSESS THE<br />
THERAPEUTIC CONTROL OF OBSTRUCTIVE <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />
APNEA<br />
Boyd SB, Walters AS, Wang L, Song Y, Malow BA<br />
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA<br />
Introduction: CPAP is highly efficacious, but the clinical effectiveness<br />
may be diminished due to non-adherence. In this study we assessed an<br />
innovative measurement instrument, the Effectiveness of Treatment<br />
Apnea-Hypopnea Index (ET-AHI). The ET-AHI is a weighted, composite<br />
measurement of the AHI both during adherence and non-adherence<br />
with CPAP therapy. ET-AHI = (CPAP Treatment AHI x % adherence to<br />
therapy) + (Untreated AHI x % non-adherence to therapy).<br />
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 37 adult (mean age = 44.2 ±<br />
9.0 years) patients with moderate to severe OSA (baseline AHI = 56.3 ±<br />
22.6), who subsequently underwent CPAP Titration (AHI = 4.3 ± 5.9).<br />
<strong>SLEEP</strong>, Volume 34, <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Supplement</strong>, <strong>2011</strong><br />
A134