14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. Clinical Sleep Science I. Sleep Disorders – Breathing<br />

0384<br />

POLYSOMNOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF nREM<br />

CYCLIC ALTERNATING PATTERN (CAP) <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

MICROARCHITECTURE IN COMPLEX AND OBSTRUCTIVE<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong> APNEA SYNDROMES<br />

Junna M 1 , St. Louis EK 1 , Dennhardt J 1,2 , Christner M 1,3 , Dresow MW 1 ,<br />

Dueffert LG 1 , Shepard P 1,3 , Westholm H 1,3 , Morgenthaler TI 1<br />

1<br />

Center for Sleep Medicine, Departments of Neurology and Internal<br />

Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA,<br />

2<br />

University of Memphis School of Medicine, Memphis, TN, USA, 3 St.<br />

Olaf College, Northfield, MN, USA<br />

Introduction: Complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS) presumably<br />

involves unstable ventilatory control mechanisms, possibly including<br />

cortical brain arousal indexed by NREM cyclic alternating pattern<br />

(CAP) sleep microarchitecture. CompSAS has been associated with<br />

opiate use, but may also be idiopathic or associated with underlying cardiac<br />

disease. We aimed to determine whether CAP sleep rates differed<br />

between CompSAS subgroups (opiate users (OU) and non-opiate users<br />

(NOU)) and non-opiate user OSA controls.<br />

Methods: 34 consecutive CompSAS patients (12 OU, 22 NOU) and<br />

18 OSA controls matched for age, sex, BMI, and AHI were manually<br />

analyzed for CAP sleep rate during diagnostic polysomnography using<br />

Hypnolab scoring software (Verona, Italy). CAP sleep rate during diagnostic<br />

polysomnography in all patients was obtained. Group averages<br />

were compared utilizing Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests in JMP (Chicago,<br />

IL).<br />

Results: CAP rate was significantly lower in CompSAS OU vs. NOU<br />

(62.1 vs. 79.3, p=0.01), and lower in CompSAS OU than OSA controls<br />

(62.1 vs. 74.0, p=0.079). There was no significant difference between<br />

CompSAS NOU and OSA controls.<br />

Conclusion: CompSAS OU had a significantly lower CAP rate than<br />

NOU, and OU also trended toward a lower CAP rate than non-opiate<br />

user OSA controls. Since CAP sleep microarchitecture may reflect cortical<br />

infraslow oscillations, our findings suggest that cortical mechanisms<br />

associated with unstable ventilatory effort in CompSAS and OSA are<br />

similar, but that opiate use may induce central apnea through a different,<br />

likely subcortical mechanism. Further analysis of CompSAS patients<br />

including co-morbid cardiac disease influences may further clarify differences<br />

in cortical arousal potential for central apnea.<br />

0385<br />

IS THERE A DIFFERENCE IN CONTINUOUS POSITIVE<br />

AIRWAY PRESSURE REQUIREMENT OR DISEASE<br />

CONTROL BETWEEN NASAL AND ORONASAL MASKS IN<br />

THE TREATMENT OF OBSTRUCTIVE <strong>SLEEP</strong> APNEA?<br />

Bakker JP, Neill A, Campbell A<br />

Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New<br />

Zealand<br />

Introduction: The aim of this randomized controlled pilot trial was to<br />

investigate whether there is a difference in continuous positive airway<br />

pressure (CPAP) requirement or residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)<br />

between nasal and oronasal masks.<br />

Methods: Adult patients (≥25 years) with severe obstructive sleep apnea<br />

(OSA) established on CPAP using a nasal mask within the previous<br />

three years were recruited. All were fitted with two oronasal masks (A<br />

and B) in addition to their own nasal mask, and were excluded if leak<br />

was >20 liters/minute at 8cmH2O while awake. Patients were randomized<br />

to CPAP at manually-titrated pressure, or auto-adjusting positive<br />

airway pressure (APAP) for seven nights each, with immediate crossover.<br />

Within each week, the two oronasal masks were used for two<br />

nights each and the nasal mask for three nights, in random order.<br />

Results: Twelve patients (mean±SD body mass index 37.7±5.0 kg/m2,<br />

AHI 59.8±28.6 events/hour, CPAP 11.1±3.2 cmH2O) consented to the<br />

study. There was no significant difference in APAP 95th percentile pressure<br />

between the three mask types (mean±SD 11.6±2.8, 11.5±3.7 and<br />

11.6±3.2 cmH2O for nasal, oronasal A and oronasal B masks respectively,<br />

p=0.66). Six and five patients demonstrated a 95th percentile pressure<br />

difference of >1cmH2O with oronasal masks A and B respectively,<br />

compared with the nasal mask. The difference in 95th percentile pressure<br />

requirement was not strongly correlated with the difference in 95th<br />

percentile leak (nasal vs. oronasal A r=-0.36, p=0.12; nasal vs. oronasal<br />

B r=-0.29, p=0.18). The machine-interpreted residual AHI during CPAP<br />

use was significantly difference between the masks (mean±SD 1.3±1.5,<br />

4.4±8.1 and 2.7±2.5 events/hour for nasal, oronasal A and oronasal B<br />

masks respectively, p=0.03).<br />

Conclusion: This pilot randomized controlled trial found variation in<br />

pressure requirement between nasal and oronasal masks but was not statistically<br />

significant. This should be further investigated in an adequately<br />

powered trial.<br />

0386<br />

CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF EFFECTIVE CONTINUOUS<br />

POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH<br />

OBSTRUCTIVE <strong>SLEEP</strong> APNEA/HYPOPNEA SYNDROME<br />

Lin H 1 , Friedman M 2<br />

1<br />

Dept. of Otolaryngology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung<br />

Medical Center, Fong Shang City, Taiwan, 2 Otolaryngology, Rush<br />

University & Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL,<br />

USA<br />

Introduction: To identify standard clinical parameters that may predict<br />

the optimal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in patients with<br />

obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) in Taiwanese.<br />

Methods: One hundred twenty-nine OSAHS patients who underwent<br />

a completed physical examination, successful manual CPAP titration<br />

were included in this study. We recorded the severity of nasal obstruction,<br />

modified Mallampati grade (aka updated Friedman’s tongue position<br />

(uFTP)), tonsil size, neck circumference and body mass index<br />

(BMI) and measured thyroid-mental distance and hyoid-mental distance<br />

(HMD) in the study population.<br />

Results: When the physical parameters were correlated singly with the<br />

optimal CPAP, we found that uFTP, HMD and apnea/hypopnea index<br />

(AHI) were reliable predictors of OSA (P = 0.013, P = 0.002, P = 0.000,<br />

by Multiple Regression). When all important factors were considered in<br />

a stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, a significant correlation<br />

with optimal CPAP was formulated by factoring the uFTP, HMD and<br />

AHI (Optimal CPAP = 1.01 uFTP + 0.74 HMD + 0.059 AHI - 1.603).<br />

Conclusion: This study has distinguished the correlation between updated<br />

Friedman’s tongue position, hyoid-mental distance, and AHI with<br />

the optimal CPAP. The structure of upper airway (esp. tongue base obstruction)<br />

and disease severity may predict the level of optimal CPAP.<br />

0387<br />

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT APNEA-HYPOPNEA<br />

INDEX (ET-AHI): A NEW METHOD TO ASSESS THE<br />

THERAPEUTIC CONTROL OF OBSTRUCTIVE <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

APNEA<br />

Boyd SB, Walters AS, Wang L, Song Y, Malow BA<br />

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA<br />

Introduction: CPAP is highly efficacious, but the clinical effectiveness<br />

may be diminished due to non-adherence. In this study we assessed an<br />

innovative measurement instrument, the Effectiveness of Treatment<br />

Apnea-Hypopnea Index (ET-AHI). The ET-AHI is a weighted, composite<br />

measurement of the AHI both during adherence and non-adherence<br />

with CPAP therapy. ET-AHI = (CPAP Treatment AHI x % adherence to<br />

therapy) + (Untreated AHI x % non-adherence to therapy).<br />

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 37 adult (mean age = 44.2 ±<br />

9.0 years) patients with moderate to severe OSA (baseline AHI = 56.3 ±<br />

22.6), who subsequently underwent CPAP Titration (AHI = 4.3 ± 5.9).<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>, Volume 34, <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Supplement</strong>, <strong>2011</strong><br />

A134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!