14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Basic Science XII. Instrumentation and Methodology<br />

with 10h nighttime sleep (TIB 22:00-08:00), subjects were given a<br />

5h nap (TIB 15:00-20:00), and underwent 5 days of night work with<br />

daytime sleep (TIB 10:00-20:00). Subjects then had a recovery period,<br />

which began with a 5h nap (TIB 10:00-15:00) and was followed by 10h<br />

nighttime sleep (TIB 22:00-08:00). On the second baseline day and after<br />

recovery, 24h glucose profiles were measured in interstitial fluid (sampled<br />

every 5 minutes), using the subcutaneous glucose monitor inserted<br />

into an area of the lower back accommodating subcutaneous placement<br />

while minimizing catheter movement due to pressure from clothing. Additionally,<br />

blood was taken at 2h intervals by intravenous catheter, spun,<br />

aliquoted, stored at −80°C, and assayed for glucose by Biovision Glucose<br />

Assay. Subjects were mobile during scheduled wakefulness; meals<br />

provided were identical for the two measurement days to control for<br />

carbohydrate intake.<br />

Results: The intravenous glucose levels were entered into Medtronic<br />

glucose software to calibrate the interstitial glucose profiles. These profiles<br />

were analyzed using mixed-effects ANOVA to compare baseline<br />

glucose traces to post-recovery traces. Over all subjects, the baseline<br />

glucose trace explained 4.8% of the variance in the post-recovery trace.<br />

Analyzing only the two subjects with the least noisy data, the baseline<br />

trace explained 44.4% of the variance in the post-recovery trace.<br />

Conclusion: Although in specific cases, 24h subcutaneous glucose profiles<br />

were replicable within subjects, this was not true in general. Postrecovery<br />

glucose profiles may have differed from baseline profiles due<br />

to the intervening night work schedule. Even so, the data seemed particularly<br />

noisy, potentially because subjects were ambulatory, which may<br />

have resulted in movement artifact. This could be mitigated by keeping<br />

subjects stationary and/or changing catheter placement location.<br />

Support (If Any): FMCSA award DTMC75-07-D-00006<br />

A115<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>, Volume 34, <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Supplement</strong>, <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!