14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Basic Science IX. Learning, Memory and Cognition<br />

0212<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>’S (COMPLICATED AND UNEXPECTED)<br />

INFLUENCES ON VERBAL MEMORY<br />

Sheth B 1,2 , Varghese R 3 , Truong T 3<br />

1<br />

Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston,<br />

TX, USA, 2 Center for NeuroEngineering and Cognitive Science,<br />

University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 3 University of Houston,<br />

Houston, TX, USA<br />

Introduction: Sleep protects verbal memories by boosting resistance<br />

from subsequent (prospective) associative interference. We asked: (1)<br />

Is sleep indispensable to verbal memory? (2) Does sleep protect verbal<br />

memory from retroactive and non-associative forms of interference? (3)<br />

Does sleep enhance verbal memory or help retain it better? The goal was<br />

to delineate the influences and limits of sleep’s role in affecting recently<br />

acquired verbal memories.<br />

Methods: Each volunteer (n=160 total) participated in only one of our<br />

experiments. Participants memorized unrelated pairs of words A i<br />

-B i<br />

.<br />

Following an intervening period of 12-24 hours that did or did not include<br />

sleep, participants memorized a second pair of interfering words<br />

A i<br />

-C i,<br />

/C-D just before being tested on their memory of both.<br />

Results: (1) Reducing required rehearsal during training increased the<br />

benefits of sleep on test recall 12 hours later. Increasing required rehearsal<br />

during training entirely compensated for the benefit of sleep<br />

(sleep-85%, wake-90%). (2) When observers acquired non-associative<br />

C-D pairs 12 hours following A-B pairs, sleep provided a statistically indistinguishable<br />

benefit in test recall of A-B word pairs (13%) compared<br />

with when observers acquired A-C pairs (19%). In another experiment,<br />

participants learnt 60 A-B word pairs. Twelve hours later, they acquired<br />

A-C word pairs. There was a significant (14%) sleep-dependent benefit<br />

on test recall of A-C word pairs. (3) A-B recall 12 hours versus right<br />

after training did not differ.<br />

Conclusion: Sleep is one way, but not an exclusive one, of sheltering<br />

verbal memory from associative prospective interference. Sleep can also<br />

protect verbal memories from non-associative and retroactive interference.<br />

Sleep does not help enhance verbal memory but shelters it from<br />

fading. Additional analysis demonstrates that sleep prior to memory encoding<br />

provides no benefit. Combined, our results are more consistent<br />

with the idea that sleep benefits verbal memory by preventing its subsequent<br />

re-exposure rather than by replaying it.<br />

0213<br />

NOVEL OBJECT LEARNING DEPENDS ON RAPID EYE<br />

MOVEMENT <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

Mednick SC 1 , McDevitt EA 1 , Brady M 2<br />

1<br />

Psychiatry, 9116a, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA, 2 Psychology,<br />

University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA<br />

Introduction: A fundamental function of biological vision is to detect<br />

and recognize potential food items and predators from naturally cluttered<br />

backgrounds when form and coloration of target objects are similar<br />

to the background. Brady and Kersten (2003) previously showed that<br />

subjects can do this via bootstrapped learning. Sleep, specifically rapid<br />

eye movement (REM), has been shown to enhance perceptual learning.<br />

Here, we examined the role of REM sleep in object learning in ambiguous<br />

backgrounds.<br />

Methods: At 9AM and 5PM, 82 subjects were tested on an object learning<br />

task. At 1PM, subjects fitted with EEG electrodes and randomized<br />

to a quiet rest condition (QR) or nap condition with or without REM.<br />

Stimuli were artificial morphogenic objects that appear to be organic<br />

forms but do not resemble a familiar class of organism and are camouflaged<br />

by similar shapes. During AM training, subjects were shown<br />

three objects in cluttered backgrounds and asked to trace each object in<br />

the foreground (Trace condition). Next, subjects passively view these<br />

camouflaged objects appearing with a characteristic sound. At PM test,<br />

subjects were asked to recognize objects in the Test condition and retrace<br />

objects in the Trace condition.<br />

Results: REM group was significantly better than NREM and QR in<br />

recognition (Test), both QR and NREM performed just above chance.<br />

Both nap groups were significantly better than QR in the Trace condition.<br />

Conclusion: We found an essential role for REM sleep in learning to<br />

detect and recognize novel objects from camouflage. REM occupies a<br />

large proportion of sleep during early development, and has been hypothesized<br />

to be related to cortical plasticity. The following results suggest<br />

that learning to recognize and segment objects that share the same<br />

form and coloration as their background requires REM sleep in adulthood<br />

and has implications for infant object learning.<br />

Support (If Any): K01MH080992<br />

0214<br />

SPATIAL MEMORY PERFORMANCE SHIFTS ITS<br />

ASSOCIATION FROM SLOW WAVE <strong>SLEEP</strong> TO REM <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

WHEN AN EMOTIONAL COMPONENT IS ADDED<br />

Stenstrom P 1,3 , Nielsen TA 2 , Solomonova E 3 , Bujwid V 4 , Amato A 4<br />

1<br />

Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA, 2 Psychiatry,<br />

University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3 Psychology,<br />

University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada, 4 Psychology, McGill<br />

University, Montreal, QC, Canada<br />

Introduction: While many studies link slow wave sleep (SWS) to the<br />

processing of declarative memory, a small but growing literature demonstrates<br />

a role for rapid eye movement (REM) sleep when such memory<br />

is emotionally charged. Here we examined if a SWS-associated task<br />

shifts its dependence to REM sleep when this task is made emotional.<br />

Methods: We had 16 participants undergo two matched spatial navigation<br />

tasks that differed in emotional tone and observed how performance<br />

in each task was affected by one night of selective REM deprivation.<br />

Participants slept one night in a sleep laboratory and were randomly assigned<br />

to either a REM sleep deprived (REMD; awakened after 5 minutes<br />

of REM sleep) or a control (CTL; awakened after 25 minutes of<br />

REM sleep). Ten to 12 days post-task participants were given surface<br />

maps of the two versions of the spatial task (fig. S1) and instructed to<br />

mark the houses they had visited.<br />

Results: The REMD group was successfully REM sleep deprived,<br />

showing lower %REM sleep (M=9.51, SD=1.08) than the CTL group<br />

(M=16.71, SD=5.57; t12=3.36, p=.005). The REMD group had more<br />

missed targets than the CTL group on the emotional version of the task<br />

(REMD: M=2.86, SD=.38; CTL: M=2.00, SD=.58; t12=-3.29, p=.01)<br />

but fewer wrong targets on the neutral version (CTL: M=2.67, SD=.79;<br />

REMD: M=1.43, SD=.78: t12=2.76, p=.02). Missed targets on the emotional<br />

version of the task were negatively correlated with min in REM<br />

sleep (r16=-0.71, p=.005), and %REM sleep (r16=-0.71, p=.004). Wrong<br />

targets on the neutral version of the task were negatively correlated with<br />

min in Stage 4 sleep (r16=-0.62, p=.01) and %Stage 4 sleep (r16=-0.65,<br />

p=.006) and positively correlated with %REM sleep (r16=0.55, p=.03).<br />

Conclusion: Together, these findings suggest that imbuing a spatial<br />

memory task with dysphoric emotions switches its association from<br />

SWS to REM sleep.<br />

Support (If Any): This research was supported by a Natural Sciences<br />

and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant and a Natural Sciences<br />

and Engineering Research Council of Canada Graduate Scholarship.<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>, Volume 34, <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Supplement</strong>, <strong>2011</strong><br />

A76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!