14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A. Basic Science IV. Neurobiology<br />

in the sensorimotor network. However, in DMN, the only significant<br />

decreased connectivity is found between PCC and medial prefrontal<br />

cortex from stage two to SWS. In contrast, REM sleep reactivates the<br />

functional connectivity in both networks as regarded as in the awake<br />

condition. Comparing the post-sleep resting scans with pre-sleep, the<br />

dissociations are observed in sensorimotor network when wake-up, but<br />

spatial reconsolidation in DMN appears to be an after-sleep effect.<br />

Conclusion: Significant reduction of functional connectivity was found<br />

in both networks during sleep, which may be associated with the fading<br />

consciousness in sleep. The breakdown of functional connectivity may<br />

be a common feature representing the rejuvenation effect of sleep. Reconsolidation<br />

of DMN and remained dissociation of sensorimotor network<br />

might indicate the full recovery of self-consciousness but ongoing<br />

integrity of disrupted somato-sensations. Such phenomenon merit future<br />

investigations for discovering brain functions during sleep.<br />

Support (If Any): Intramural Research Program of the National Institute<br />

on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and National Science Council, Taiwan(NSC98-<br />

2917-I-564-158)<br />

0104<br />

INTERACTIONS BETWEEN CORE AND MATRIX<br />

THALAMOCORTICAL PROJECTIONS IN HUMAN <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

SPINDLE SYNCHRONIZATION<br />

Bonjean M 1,2 , Baker T 1 , Cash S 3 , Bazhenov M 4 , Halgren E 5 , Sejnowski<br />

T 1,2<br />

1<br />

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute for<br />

Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA, 2 Department of Biomedical<br />

Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA,<br />

3<br />

Massachussets General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston,<br />

MA, USA, 4 Department of Cellular Biology and Neuroscience,<br />

University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA, 5 Department<br />

of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA,<br />

USA<br />

Introduction: Human sleep spindles are highly synchronous across the<br />

scalp when measured with EEG channels, but not when measured simultaneously<br />

with MEG sensors which exhibit low correlation and low<br />

coherence with each other and with EEG signals. In this study, we used a<br />

computational model to explore the hypothesis that interactions between<br />

the core and matrix thalamocortical subsystems were responsible for the<br />

complex spatiotemporal patterns of spindle synchronization observed<br />

experimentally.<br />

Methods: To adequately investigate our hypothesis in light of the human<br />

experimental data mentioned above, we constructed a realistic<br />

four-layer model of the thalamus and the cortex, comprising two main<br />

distinct but interconnected thalamocortical pathways known from the<br />

primate literature: (i) core pathway, which has thalamic afferents in the<br />

middle layers of the cortex, mostly layers III and IV, and (ii) matrix<br />

pathway, which has thalamic afferents to superficial layers of the cortex,<br />

mostly layer I.<br />

Results: We found that the relative synchrony of spindle oscillations<br />

between core and matrix networks depends on the pattern of intracortical<br />

connections between the networks. Increasing the fanout of thalamocortical<br />

connectivity in the matrix system while keeping it constant<br />

in the core system led to increased synchrony of the spindle activity in<br />

the matrix system. In constrast, increasing the cortico-thalamic fanout or<br />

cortico-cortical connectivity between matrix and core systems had no effect<br />

on spindle synchrony. Conversely, the latency for spindles to spread<br />

from the core to matrix subsystem was independent of thalamocortical<br />

fanout, but highly dependent on the probability of connections between<br />

the systems.<br />

Conclusion: Our results suggests that the known anatomical differences<br />

between matrix and core subsystems in thalamocortical fanout<br />

may be necessary and sufficient to produce different levels of synchrony<br />

of spindle discharges between different cortical locations. These differ-<br />

ences may explain the discrepancies between spindles simultaneously<br />

recorded by EEG versus MEG.<br />

Support (If Any): This study was supported by NIH-NIBIB (Grant<br />

1R01EB009282-01).<br />

0105<br />

CORTICOTHALAMIC FEEDBACK CONTROLS <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

SPINDLE DURATION IN VIVO<br />

Bonjean M 1,2 , Baker T 1 , Lemieux M 3 , Timofeev I 3 , Sejnowski T 1,2 ,<br />

Bazhenov M 4<br />

1<br />

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute for Biological<br />

Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA, 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences,<br />

University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA, 3 School<br />

of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada, 4 Department<br />

of Cellular Biology and Neuroscience, University of California,<br />

Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

Introduction: Evidence from slice experiments and modeling studies<br />

has supported a mechanism for spindle termination mediated by upregulation<br />

of the hyperpolarization activated depolarizing current (Ih), which<br />

is dependent on intracellular Ca2+ concentration. In the present study<br />

using a combination of in vivo and modeling experiments, we provide,<br />

for the first time, compelling evidence that the cortical feedback plays<br />

an active role in terminating spindle oscillations by desynchronizing<br />

thalamocortical neurons, effectively controlling the duration of spindles.<br />

Methods: Electrophysiological experiments were conducted in cats<br />

(n=5) under general anesthesia. Juxtacellular recordings were performed<br />

from motor and somatosensory areas of the cortex. Simultaneous dual<br />

intracellular recordings in parallel with local field potential recordings<br />

from cortical (motor cortex) and thalamic (VL nucleus) areas were carried<br />

out to assess the temporal relationships between thalamic and cortical<br />

activities during spindles. A biologically plausible neuronal network<br />

model of the thalamocortical loop was constructed to investigate the<br />

relative contribution of thalamic and cortical factors in spindle termination.<br />

Thalamocortical and thalamic reticular neurons were modeled<br />

along with the cortical pyramidal neurons and inhibitory interneurons.<br />

Each neuron consisted of a dendritic and an axosomatic compartments,<br />

and was embedded with specific ion channels all following Hodgkin-<br />

Huxley kinetics. Synaptic connections were represented by AMPA-,<br />

NMDA-, GABAa-, and GABAb-type of receptors. The spatial patterns<br />

of synaptic afferents and efferents were stochastically distributed as observed<br />

biologically.<br />

Results: Desynchronization of firing between thalamic and cortical<br />

neurons was found to be a primary mechanism for spindle termination<br />

complimented by h-current upregulation. It leads to cortical spiking after<br />

rebound burst in the thalamus, which prevents T-channels de-inactivation<br />

and promotes spindle termination.<br />

Conclusion: The cortical feedback actively influences the termination<br />

of sleep spindles in vivo. The cortex can control the duration of spindles,<br />

in contrast to the view that sleep spindles are purely controlled by intrinsic<br />

thalamic properties.<br />

Support (If Any): This study was supported by NIH-NIBIB (Grant<br />

1R01EB009282-01).<br />

0106<br />

THE HUMAN BRAIN’S RESPONSE TO AUDITORY<br />

STIMULATION VARIES WITH THE PHASE OF SUB-1HZ<br />

OSCILLATION IN NON-REM <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

Sheth B 1,2 , Bendele T 1<br />

1<br />

Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Houston, Houston,<br />

TX, USA, 2 Center for NeuroEngineering and Cognitive Science,<br />

University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA<br />

Introduction: During non-REM sleep, the brain oscillates at a frequency<br />

< 1Hz. Alternating up and down states of these slow wave oscillations<br />

correspond to depolarization and hyperpolarization of neurons and<br />

A39<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>, Volume 34, <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Supplement</strong>, <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!