14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Basic Science V. Physiology<br />

utes, REM minutes, REM latency) predict cortisol baseline levels after<br />

controlling for age, BMI and gender, using linear regression analysis.<br />

Results: REM sleep reduction (night 1 minus average of nights 2 and 3)<br />

was associated significantly with 24-h plasma cortisol secretion. None<br />

of the other sleep variables examined was significantly associated with<br />

baseline cortisol levels.<br />

Conclusion: The first night effect is stronger in individuals with increased<br />

cortisol secretion. It appears that REM sleep reduction when sleeping in<br />

an unfamiliar, stressful environment is a marker of increased baseline activity<br />

of the HPA axis. This, in turn may indicate increased vulnerability<br />

to objective sleep disturbance under stressful circumstances.<br />

0132<br />

FALL <strong>SLEEP</strong> PATTERNS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH WINTER/<br />

SPRING ACUTE ILLNESS AND SCHOOL ABSENCES IN<br />

ADOLESCENTS<br />

Orzech KM 1,2 , Acebo C 1,2 , Barker DH 1 , Seifer R 1,2 , Carskadon MA 1,2<br />

1<br />

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Alpert Medical<br />

School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, 2 E.P. Bradley<br />

Hospital Sleep Research Laboratory, Providence, RI, USA<br />

Introduction: Sleep restriction has been linked to decreased immune<br />

function, and longitudinal data may help determine whether sleep restriction<br />

affects the incidence and duration of acute illnesses. Our team<br />

collected data using in-person interviews across 16 weeks to assess illness<br />

and school absences.<br />

Methods: Fifty-six adolescents aged 14 to 19 years (39% male) were<br />

assigned to Long or Short sleep groups based on one week of actigraphy<br />

during the fall (Short sleepers Mean = 5 hrs 48 [SD = 32] min;<br />

Long sleepers Mean = 7 hrs 36 [27] min). Adolescents were interviewed<br />

weekly in winter/spring (modal number of interviews = 13) using a<br />

structured protocol that included 14 questions about health events.<br />

Events were coded and entered into SPSS. For 710 completed interviews<br />

participants reported 683 illness events and 90 school absences.<br />

Average illness duration and rates per week were calculated for illness<br />

bouts and school absences. Outcomes were compared between sleep and<br />

sex groups using MANOVA.<br />

Results: Illness bout number differed across sex and sleep groups, with<br />

males and Long sleepers reporting fewer illness bouts (males = .26<br />

[mean] +/- .05 [SE], females = .59 +/- .05, p < .01; Long = .33 +/- .05,<br />

Short = .52 +/- .05, p < .01.) Illness duration, by contrast, showed no<br />

main effect of sex or group but an interaction (p = .04) with male Long<br />

sleepers reporting shorter illness duration than males in the Short sleep<br />

group (male Long = .09 +/- .04, male Short = .20 +/- .03; female Long<br />

= .21 +/- .03, female Short = .17 +/- .04). Long sleepers reported fewer<br />

absences (Long = .07 +/- .03, Short = .18 +/- .04, p = .02.)<br />

Conclusion: Absences and acute illnesses were more frequent in otherwise<br />

healthy adolescents with short sleep the previous semester.<br />

Support (If Any): Support received from the National Institute of Mental<br />

Health (MH19927-16, MH078788-03, MH45945).<br />

0133<br />

TOLERANCE OF CHRONIC <strong>SLEEP</strong> RESTRICTION IN<br />

LONG <strong>SLEEP</strong>ERS DOES NOT DIFFER FOR THOSE WITH<br />

EXISTING MORBIDITIES<br />

Youngstedt SD 1,2 , Kline CE 1,2,3 , Zielinski M 4 , Kripke DF 5,6<br />

1<br />

Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC,<br />

USA, 2 Research and Development, WJB Dorn VA Medical Center,<br />

Columbia, SC, USA, 3 Sleep Medicine Institute and Dept Psychiatry,<br />

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,<br />

4<br />

Program in Neuroscience, Washington State University, Spokane, WA,<br />

USA, 5 Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA,<br />

USA, 6 Sleep Center, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA<br />

Introduction: Over the past half-century, approximately 50 epidemiologic<br />

studies have found a significant association of long sleep with<br />

mortality. It has been argued that the association might represent the opposite<br />

direction of putative causality, i.e., morbidity causing long sleep.<br />

Contrary to this argument are findings that the association of long sleep<br />

with mortality is just as apparent following control for morbidities, and<br />

in samples restricted to apparently healthy individuals at initial assessment.<br />

The argument can also be addressed by assessing responses to<br />

sleep restriction. The aim of this investigation was to compare tolerance<br />

to chronic moderate sleep restriction in older long sleepers with existing<br />

morbidities vs. those who were healthier at baseline.<br />

Methods: Forty-two adults ages 50-70 yrs who reported habitual sleep<br />

durations of ≥ 8.5 hr were assessed. Following a two-week baseline,<br />

participants were randomized to one of two eight-week treatments: (1)<br />

time-in-bed (TIB) restriction of 90 min per night relative to baseline,<br />

or (2) a control. Changes were assessed in glucose tolerance and insulin<br />

sensitivity, sleepiness, depression, health-related quality of life,<br />

functional outcomes of sleepiness, and a neurobehavioral performance<br />

battery. In three sets of analyses, responses to sleep restriction were<br />

compared between participants who were dichotomized regarding the<br />

presence or absence of morbidity, with absence defined as (1) no morbidity,<br />

except hypertension, high cholesterol, moderate snoring, migraine<br />

headaches, history of hysterectomy, smoking, and allergies; (2)<br />

no morbidity, except for hypertension and high cholesterol; (3) complete<br />

absence of morbidity.<br />

Results: As reported previously, TIB restriction elicited no negative effects<br />

on any outcome. Moreover, there were no significant differences in<br />

tolerance to TIB restriction between healthy participants and those with<br />

existing morbidities.<br />

Conclusion: These data provide further refutation of the argument that<br />

morbidity causes long sleep, and the hypothesis that less healthy individuals<br />

would be less tolerant of sleep restriction.<br />

Support (If Any): HL71560, VA Merit, VA (VISN-7) Career Development<br />

0134<br />

A STUDY ON BEDROOM ENVIRONMENT AND <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

QUALITY IN KOREA<br />

Han J<br />

Neurology, Seoul Sleep Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea<br />

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate both the<br />

sleep environment and sleep quality in bedrooms. It was also to reveal<br />

the relationship between sleep environment and sleep quality, and to<br />

study its seasonal changes in winter, spring, and summer.<br />

Methods: The subjects for this study were 24 women who lived in<br />

apartments in Seoul and its environs. We conducted two groups of measurements.<br />

One group considered elements of the sleep environment;<br />

mean radiant temperature, air temperature, relative humidity, carbon dioxide<br />

(CO2) concentration, illumination, and equivalent noise level. The<br />

other looked at elements of sleep quality; the apneahypopnea index, and<br />

inspiratory flow limitation (as%FL), which were measured simultaneously<br />

while subjects were asleep.<br />

Results: Results showed first, that people were exposed to a variety of<br />

problems when asleep, related to their sleep environment such as too<br />

low or high air temperatures, or relative humidity and high CO2 concentrations.<br />

Second, these were seasonally dependant and people slept<br />

best during spring, then winter, and then summer. Third, the effect of the<br />

sleep environment on sleep quality varied with age.<br />

Conclusion: The sleep environment was affected by seasonal differences,<br />

CO2 concentration, and sleep breathing pattern.<br />

A49<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>, Volume 34, <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Supplement</strong>, <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!