14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. Clinical Sleep Science XIV. Instrumentation and Methodology<br />

0967<br />

THE ROLE OF ACTIGRAPHY AND A <strong>SLEEP</strong> DIARY IN CPAP<br />

ADHERENCE<br />

Muehlbach MJ, Powell ED, Poeppel EL, Ojile JM<br />

Clayton Sleep Institute, St. Louis, MO, USA<br />

Introduction: The topic of CPAP adherence is of continual clinical relevance.<br />

Various studies have tried to assess variables that may predict<br />

or influence adherence with CPAP therapy. Actigraphy and sleep diaries<br />

are common tools used to gather ambulatory sleep patterns, but limited<br />

data have been presented on the benefits of these tools in reporting adherence<br />

patterns. The goal of the present study was to assess the relationship<br />

between CPAP usage patterns and actigraphy/sleep diary data.<br />

Methods: Data was used from a prior study assessing adherence with<br />

various treatment modalities. As part of that study, actigraphy, sleep diary,<br />

and treatment adherence was measured daily. Each day with matching<br />

and complete variables was used as a data point for analysis.<br />

Results: A total of 333 days with complete data sets were used for analysis.<br />

CPAP adherence significantly correlated with actigraphy variables<br />

of TIB (p< .001), TST (p< .001), WASO (p< .05), and Fragmentation Index<br />

(p< .001). However, only the Fragmentation Index was significantly<br />

correlated to diary estimates of CPAP use (p< .001). Using actigraphy<br />

and diary variables as predictors for CPAP adherence, the variables of<br />

diary TST and actigraphy TST entered the predictive model and accounted<br />

for 12% of the variance (F= 20.691, p< .001). Comparing compliant<br />

vs. non-compliant CPAP users (> 240 min/nt), the non-compliant<br />

users drastically overestimate usage (diary: 305.2 min vs. actual 87.1<br />

min) whereas the compliant users more accurately estimate their usage<br />

(diary: 374.1 min vs. actual 375.1 min). Actigraphy may also be a beneficial<br />

tool for assessing treatment adherence, as non-compliant users<br />

had a significantly higher WASO and Fragmentation Index and lower<br />

TST than the compliant users (all p< .05).<br />

Conclusion: There are a variety of factors involved in CPAP adherence,<br />

and it can be challenging to clinicians to fully assess and understand adherence<br />

patterns. Actigraphy and sleep diary collection while on CPAP<br />

may be a beneficial tool to understanding this process. Specifically, the<br />

fragmentation index may give insight to either non-use or unresolved<br />

sleep disruptions that may be factors tied to treatment use.<br />

0968<br />

DIRECT ACTIVITY MEASURES ARE USEFUL ACTIGRAPHY<br />

ENDPOINTS FOR DETECTING DIFFERENCES IN <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

AND DAYTIME ACTIVITY AMONG DIFFERENT PATIENT<br />

POPULATIONS<br />

Peterson BT 1 , Resnick M 2 , Chen C 1 , Amin N 1 , Brosnan M 1 , Badura L 1 ,<br />

Pickering EH 1<br />

1<br />

Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, CT, USA, 2 Pfizer<br />

Primary Care Business Unit, New York, NY, USA<br />

Introduction: Actigraphy helps diagnose sleep problems in patients,<br />

but clinical studies require objective endpoints that quantify sleep and<br />

daytime activity. An algorithm is typically used to identify “sleep” vs.<br />

“awake” periods allowing endpoints such as total sleep time (aTST) and<br />

sleep efficiency (aEff) to be derived. Alternatively, activity counts can<br />

be used to calculate direct activity endpoints. This study assessed direct<br />

activity and derived endpoints in different populations.<br />

Methods: A Bodymedia Armband was worn day and night (3-21 days)<br />

by 38 healthy volunteers (HV), 66 fibromyalgia (FM) patients, and 15<br />

obese subjects. 24 patients with Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS) wore the<br />

armband for 2-5 nights. All patient data are from the placebo-arm of<br />

clinical trials. A program calculated derived (aTST [mins], aEff [%])<br />

and direct activity endpoints (mean, 75th, 90th percentiles during sleep,<br />

and mean, 10th, 25th percentiles during daytime). Percentiles were<br />

based on patient’s distribution of recorded activity (counts/min). Data<br />

are mean±s.e.<br />

Results: Compared with HV (415.0±10.4), aTST (mins) was unchanged<br />

in FM (419.2±10.3), increased in obese (477.0±17.9;P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!