14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B. Clinical Sleep Science XI. Pediatrics<br />

stress (Bertocci et al., 1992). Studies have suggested that environmental<br />

factors, especially stress and stimulant use, are associated with poor<br />

sleep quality (Lund et al., 2009). The aim of this study was to elucidate<br />

the associations between sleep, stress, and the caffeine-powered, technological<br />

environments of emerging adults.<br />

Methods: A sample of 1st - 4th year students (N=194) from a New<br />

England college completed self-report questionnaires. Questions were<br />

adapted from prior measures of sleep, stress, caffeine, and media use<br />

(Cohen, et al., 1983; Ludden & Wolfson, 2010; Sharif & Sargent, 2006;<br />

Van Den Bluck, 2004; Wolfson & Carskadon, 1998).<br />

Results: In the hour before “lights out,” 46% of respondents reported<br />

watching television, 78% used a computer, 36% used an MP3 player,<br />

and 73% text messaged. Males had more delayed bed/wake times, yet<br />

females experienced greater daytime sleepiness and perceived stress (all<br />

p < .05). Students with at least 1 TV in their bedroom reported earlier<br />

class wake times and those with 2+ computers in their bedrooms experienced<br />

more irregular sleep (all p < .05). Those text messaging in the<br />

hour before “lights out” reported more daytime sleepiness, while students<br />

who played more video games had more delayed bed/ wake times.<br />

Finally, 65% reported using caffeine to stay awake.<br />

Conclusion: This study provides a picture of sleep patterns and perceived<br />

stress in the context of college environments. Findings suggest<br />

that increasingly technological, caffeinated, and stressful environments<br />

might compromise sleep and daytime functioning. Future studies should<br />

investigate the complex relationships between screen use, stimulants,<br />

stress, and sleep in emerging adults’ lives to develop solutions that improve<br />

sleeping habits and promote well-being during emerging adulthood.<br />

0850<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong> PATTERNS ACROSS ADOLESCENCE AND<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>INESS DURING CLASS HOURS<br />

Michaud F, Forest G, Green-Demers I<br />

Psychoéducation et psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais,<br />

Gatineau, QC, Canada<br />

Introduction: Teenagers show a delay in their sleep-wake pattern resulting<br />

in later bedtimes (BT) and rise times (RT) as they get older. This<br />

contrasts with fixed schedules imposed by social and school demands<br />

and therefore has an influence on daytime functioning. This study examined<br />

the changes in sleep patterns throughout adolescence and its influence<br />

on daytime sleepiness.<br />

Methods: 759 adolescents (47% boys, 53% girls, 13 to 19 years old,<br />

grade 9 to 11) completed a questionnaire on sleep habits and daytime<br />

sleepiness. Mean differences between age groups (13-14, 15-16, 17 and<br />

up) for BT, RT, total sleep time (TST) during school nights (SN) and<br />

weekend nights (WN), sleep disorders, sleep initiation difficulties, and<br />

sleepiness during class were assessed using one-way ANOVAs.<br />

Results: Results show a significant interaction between age and BT on<br />

SN and WN (F(2,746) =20.02, p< 0.01; F(2,737)=13.13, p< 0.01), age<br />

and TST on SN and WN (F(2,733)=8.27, p< 0.01; F(2,719) = 5.42, p<<br />

0.01) and age and sleepiness (F(2,738) =7.5, p< 0.01). Post-Hoc comparisons<br />

using Tukey’s test revealed that as teenagers got older, BT were<br />

delayed, TST decreased, and sleepiness increased.<br />

Conclusion: These results confirmed that adolescents tend to go to bed<br />

later on SN and WN as they get older (even later than the mean bedtimes<br />

observed in adult), but do not compensate by delaying their wake up<br />

time. As a result, they tend to get less sleep and to become sleepier as<br />

they get older. Our results also suggest that daytime sleepiness in teenagers<br />

is more related to changes in sleep patterns rather than to the manifestation<br />

of sleep disorders or sleep initiation difficulties.<br />

0851<br />

EFFECTS OF <strong>SLEEP</strong>-SMART PROGRAM ON YOUNG<br />

ADOLESCENTS’ PERCEIVED <strong>SLEEP</strong> BEHAVIOR<br />

COMPETENCE<br />

Harkins E 1 , Kyriakos C 1 , Marco CA 2 , Wolfson A 1<br />

1<br />

Psychology, College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, MA, USA,<br />

2<br />

Psychology, Rhode Island College, Providence, RI, USA<br />

Introduction: Although laboratory research has demonstrated that adolescents<br />

require 9.2 hours of sleep, self-report and actigraphy methods<br />

have documented that adolescents obtain insufficient sleep with adverse<br />

consequences. This study examined the impact of a social learning<br />

based, prevention for early adolescents, Sleep-Smart Pacesetter Program,<br />

that focused on sleep efficacy, hygiene, and sleep need. Studies<br />

(Martin, et al., 2009), have suggested a connection between perception<br />

of competence (ability to maintain consistent sleep patterns) and change<br />

(improved sleep).<br />

Methods: Cluster sampling of 7th graders from 2 urban, public middle<br />

schools (SST = 8:37am) was used with health classes assigned to Sleep-<br />

Smart (SS = 70) or Comparison group (C = 73). During the 6-week<br />

program (8 sessions, M = 23 students/class), SS 7th graders learned to<br />

establish efficacious sleep patterns and hygiene. Pre- (T1) and Post-program<br />

(T2), SS and Comparison adolescents completed questionnaires<br />

(Health-Sleep Efficacy, Sleep Hygiene) and wore actigraphs to estimate<br />

their sleep patterns. Data were analyzed using repeated measures (controlling<br />

income, gender, pubertal, bmi status) and correlations between<br />

efficacy, hygiene and actigraphy variables.<br />

Results: SS adolescents reported 8% improvement in sleep efficacy vs.<br />

Comparison’s 6% decline (p < .05. Likewise, SS vs. Comparison reported<br />

greater improvement in overall Sleep Hygiene (Physiological, Emotional<br />

particularly, p’s < .05). SS participants’ increased Sleep Efficacy/<br />

Hygiene were significantly correlated with increased sleep duration and<br />

later offset times (T1-T2) and improved T2 sleep patterns (r’s = .21 - .30,<br />

p’s < .05). Comparison adolescents’ efficacy/hygiene weren’t associated<br />

with their sleep patterns.<br />

Conclusion: Results indicate that early adolescents who participated in<br />

the Sleep-Smart Program improved their sleep competence and associated<br />

actigraphically estimated sleep patterns, such as duration. Future<br />

analyses will assess the impact of SS Program on school performance<br />

and emotional/behavioral well being at T2, 6-month, and 1-year followups.<br />

Support (If Any): NIH, NICHD, 5 R01 HD047928-06<br />

0852<br />

ADOLESCENT MOOD AFTER 5 NIGHTS OF <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

RESTRICTION<br />

Beebe DW 1,2 , Desai A 1<br />

1<br />

Beh Med & Clin Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hosp Med<br />

Cntr, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2 Pediatrics, U of Cincinnati College of<br />

Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA<br />

Introduction: Adolescents often experience chronic sleep restriction on<br />

school nights, and there is correlational evidence that short sleep is associated<br />

with negative mood. However, it is difficult to establish the presence<br />

or direction of causation from correlational data. Here we examine<br />

mood after 5 nights of experimental sleep restriction, compared to more<br />

optimal sleep duration.<br />

Methods: Data were pooled from two studies that enrolled healthy<br />

adolescents aged 14-16.9 years, all of whom completed a three-week<br />

experimental protocol that included a baseline week followed in counterbalanced<br />

order by a sleep-restricted week (SR; 6.5 hours in bed<br />

Monday-Friday nights) and an extended sleep week (ES; 10 hours Monday-Friday<br />

nights), with a two-night “washout” before each condition.<br />

Sleep duration was monitored by actigraphy. On the Saturday morning<br />

at the end of each condition, teens completed the Profile of Mood States<br />

A291<br />

<strong>SLEEP</strong>, Volume 34, <strong>Abstract</strong> <strong>Supplement</strong>, <strong>2011</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!