14.03.2014 Views

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SLEEP 2011 Abstract Supplement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

B. Clinical Sleep Science I. Sleep Disorders – Breathing<br />

able, non-invasive, and low-cost, this algorithm has the potential for<br />

SDB screening in both hospital and home care environments.<br />

0381<br />

FEASIBILITY OF DETECTION OF PERIODIC BREATHING<br />

USING RESPIRATORY SINUS ARRHYTHMIA PATTERNS<br />

FROM <strong>SLEEP</strong> TIME AMBULATORY ECG RECORDINGS<br />

Stein PK 1 , Redline S 2<br />

1<br />

Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine,<br />

St. Louis, MO, USA, 2 Department of Medicine and Division of Sleep<br />

Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA<br />

Introduction: Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), the response of<br />

the heart rate to autonomic changes during respiration, clearly tracks<br />

respiratory rate. RSA is especially prominent when subjects are supine.<br />

Periodic respiration is associated with a waxing and waning of the respiratory<br />

rate that should, in theory, be reflected in RSA and visible from a<br />

plot of instantaneous heart rate vs. time (HR tachogram).<br />

Methods: HR tachograms from the ECG channel of recordings from<br />

older adults in the Sleep Heart Health Study were examined. ECGs had<br />

been extracted and scanned to research standards on a MARS PC Holter<br />

system. (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI). N=23 participants were<br />

selected as having been identified by the technician as having periodic<br />

breathing (PERGP) and also as having a central sleep apnea (>1/hr).<br />

These were matched by age and gender with participants without periodic<br />

breathing or central sleep apnea (NOGP). The presence of periodic<br />

breathing was blindly scored from HR tachograms. Participants were<br />

categorized as definite, possible or no periodic breathing based on the<br />

presence of RSA patterns suggesting cycles of increasing and decreasing<br />

respiratory rates. When discrepancies between SHHS and visual scoring<br />

occurred, the respiratory channels of the PSG were examined.<br />

Results: Results: There were 38 interpretable recordings (9F,31M, age<br />

78 SD 4 yrs). Of the 20 usable recordings in the NOGP, 3 were categorized<br />

as definite, 3 as possible and 14 as no periodic breathing. After<br />

examination of the PSGs, one of the 3 categorized as definite periodic<br />

breathing did have it, one had missing respiratory data at the time of the<br />

periodic RSA on ECG and one had respiration that was periodic in amplitude<br />

but not frequency. Of the 3 scored as possible, one had periodic<br />

amplitude but not frequency patterns, one had an abnormal heart rate<br />

pattern and one did not have any periodic breathing. N=16 of 18 usable<br />

recordings in the PERGP were categorized as having definite periodic<br />

breathing, one as possible and one as no. After examination of the PSGs,<br />

it was determined that the PER subject classified as no, had the wrong<br />

ECG file and the PSG ECG file for that person was not available.<br />

Conclusion: Significant periodic respiration is clearly identifiable from<br />

RSA patterns on heart rate tachograms, suggesting that screening for this<br />

breathing pattern could be included in the information available from<br />

routine ambulatory ECG recordings.<br />

Support (If Any): 2RO1HL062181-09<br />

0382<br />

DELAYED CIRCADIAN PHASE AND THE TIMING OF THE<br />

POLYSOMNOGRAM TO DIAGNOSE OBSTRUCTIVE <strong>SLEEP</strong><br />

APNEA<br />

Ubaissi H, Jain V, Gutierrez G, Shan K<br />

Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, George Washington<br />

University, Washington, DC, USA<br />

Introduction: False negative polysomnograms could adversely affect<br />

the diagnosis and management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea<br />

(OSA). We hypothesize that false negative polysomnograms could occur<br />

from discordance between the patient’s circadian phase and the routine<br />

sleep laboratory schedule.<br />

Methods: Prospective study of seven patients with delayed circadian<br />

phase and high clinical suspicion for OSA. Patients were included if the<br />

first diagnostic polysomnogram, done according to the sleep laboratory<br />

timing, was negative for OSA. These patients subsequently underwent<br />

a second polysomnogram performed in accordance with the patient’s<br />

circadian phase. We evaluated differences between the two polysomnograms<br />

with respect to apnea hypopnea index (AHI), total sleep time<br />

(TST) and time spent in REM sleep. Data were analyzed with paired t<br />

test, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Mean ± SD.<br />

Results: There were statistically significant increases in all endpoints<br />

between the first and second polysomnograms. AHI and time spent in<br />

REM increased for all seven patients, while TST increased in six patients.<br />

AHI increased from 4.4 ± 1.7 events/hour to 14.3 ± 5.4 events/<br />

hour (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!