22.06.2014 Views

Rediscovering Europe in the Netherlands - St Antony's College ...

Rediscovering Europe in the Netherlands - St Antony's College ...

Rediscovering Europe in the Netherlands - St Antony's College ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

diagnosis<br />

The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands not only has a preference for economic <strong>in</strong>tegration, depoliticisation<br />

and technical embedd<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Europe</strong>an policy, but also has<br />

traditionally favoured <strong>the</strong> ‘Community method’ of decision mak<strong>in</strong>g. This<br />

method fits <strong>in</strong> well with <strong>the</strong> traditional, more or less rout<strong>in</strong>e and technical<br />

legislative and decision mak<strong>in</strong>g procedures for negative market <strong>in</strong>tegration.<br />

What is important for a small country like <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands is that this<br />

method enables <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an Commission to play a crucial role as an <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

representative of <strong>the</strong> general <strong>in</strong>terest of <strong>the</strong> community and as<br />

<strong>the</strong> defender of <strong>the</strong> Treaties, while <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an Court of Justice overseas<br />

compliance of adopted legislation and regulations. This reduces <strong>the</strong> risk of<br />

crude power politics by <strong>the</strong> larger countries. This method is also relatively<br />

transparent thanks to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Europe</strong>an Parliament. As a<br />

corollary to this, <strong>the</strong> Dutch policy elites have traditionally felt a profound<br />

distrust of what is known as <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tergovernmental method, with its<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant role for political (power) plays by <strong>the</strong> major countries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Europe</strong>an Council and <strong>the</strong> Council of M<strong>in</strong>isters (wrr 2003: 232-3 and 238-<br />

9). However, it would be a misunderstand<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>terpret this preference<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Community method as an ideologically driven desire for an ultimately<br />

federalist outcome. Dutch governments have largely been opposed<br />

to ‘grand’, let alone federal bluepr<strong>in</strong>ts for fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>tegration. Moreover,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have consistently demanded that decisions on <strong>the</strong> transfer of sovereignty<br />

from national to supranational <strong>in</strong>stitutions be preceded by lengthy<br />

and detailed <strong>in</strong>tergovernmental negotiations (Van Keulen 2006: 98).<br />

59<br />

2.4.2 <strong>the</strong> traditional method of legitimisation under pressure<br />

What are <strong>the</strong> consequences of <strong>the</strong> transitional phase <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> eu<br />

currently f<strong>in</strong>ds itself for <strong>the</strong> legitimacy of eu policy <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands?<br />

Has <strong>the</strong> specific Dutch method of legitimisation (as a result of this?)<br />

become threatened by <strong>the</strong> various outcomes s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> 1990s? Let us beg<strong>in</strong><br />

with a brief look at <strong>the</strong> general trends of support for <strong>the</strong> eu <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands.<br />

Dw<strong>in</strong>dl<strong>in</strong>g but still strong support for <strong>in</strong>tegration among <strong>the</strong> Dutch<br />

population<br />

Op<strong>in</strong>ion polls show that <strong>the</strong> general level of support for <strong>Europe</strong>an <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

among Dutch citizens (expressed as <strong>the</strong> percentage of citizens that<br />

consider membership of <strong>the</strong> eu a ‘good th<strong>in</strong>g’ and <strong>the</strong> percentage of citizens<br />

that th<strong>in</strong>k that eu membership has benefited <strong>the</strong>ir country) compared<br />

with citizens <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r member states has rema<strong>in</strong>ed relatively high s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong><br />

1970s. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> peak <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s support has, however, slightly but<br />

regularly dropped (see graphs 2.2 and 2.3 and cpb and scp 2007: 31-40).<br />

Around 1990, almost 90 percent of <strong>the</strong> Dutch population supported <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!