The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
104<br />
3.1.9 Comments<br />
Countries seeking to introduce record-keeping linked to a new<br />
licensing <strong>and</strong> registration regime might consider that they should begin<br />
with, what appears on the surface to be, a cheaper manual paper based<br />
system <strong>and</strong> then gradually evolve into a computerized database. However,<br />
this can be a false economy as considerable costs will be involved in the<br />
subsequent back-record conversion <strong>and</strong> validating the original entries. In<br />
addition, national law en<strong>for</strong>cement agencies will spend costly man-hours<br />
trawling through paper records <strong>and</strong> making numerous personal visits to<br />
carry out physical inspections in order to complete each tracing request.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are the hidden costs <strong>of</strong> paper systems. Such costs do not exist when<br />
the same searches can be conducted remotely in a matter <strong>of</strong> minutes using<br />
a central computerized national register.<br />
Recognizing these points, when Canada introduced civilian firearms<br />
registration in the late 1990s, it chose to start from scratch using<br />
computerization. Published start-up costs <strong>for</strong> the Canadian Firearms<br />
Register (CFR) quoted a figure <strong>of</strong> US$ 60 million. However, with 3.5 million<br />
gun owners being charged US$ 12 to register their 6 million firearms, these<br />
revenues helped recover some <strong>of</strong> that, but continuing expenditure has<br />
greatly increased the overall costs. Computerization was essential to<br />
streamline the process <strong>and</strong>, with built-in national data st<strong>and</strong>ards, “error<br />
rates” could be minimized. Registration used a bespoke computer<br />
programme, called the Firearms Registration Direct Entry System (FREDES)<br />
<strong>and</strong>, with a cross-reference to the FRT, validation checks were completed<br />
at the point <strong>of</strong> entry. <strong>The</strong> next generation involves cheaper web-based<br />
registration utilizing an on-line connection to the national Register. Now<br />
that the CFR is firmly established, updating the computer records is a<br />
straight<strong>for</strong>ward process requiring a limited number <strong>of</strong> permanent staff to<br />
supervise the process. <strong>The</strong> additional benefits <strong>of</strong> the CFR database are that<br />
the system <strong>of</strong> m<strong>and</strong>atory disclosures provides a capability to monitor<br />
activity in real time to proactively identify suspicious transactions. In<br />
addition, tracing enquiries are automated enabling both the restoration <strong>of</strong><br />
recovered stolen firearms to their owners <strong>and</strong> the identification <strong>of</strong> points <strong>of</strong><br />
diversion <strong>for</strong> weapons recovered used in crime.<br />
<strong>The</strong> computer programmes developed <strong>for</strong> the CFR are available as <strong>of</strong>fthe-shelf<br />
products, which other countries can purchase to avoid the<br />
expense <strong>of</strong> their own costly research <strong>and</strong> development. Start-up costs can,