08.07.2014 Views

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24<br />

have a more prominent role to play in conflict weapon investigations than<br />

in the case <strong>of</strong> “ordinary” crime guns.<br />

1.5.3.1 Military <strong>Tracing</strong> Systems<br />

<strong>The</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> military marking, record-keeping <strong>and</strong> tracing<br />

systems derives from the importance <strong>of</strong> military source arms in conflict zone<br />

trafficking, noted above.<br />

<strong>The</strong> armed <strong>for</strong>ces <strong>of</strong> most countries maintain systems <strong>for</strong> the marking<br />

<strong>and</strong> record-keeping <strong>of</strong> arms <strong>and</strong> ammunition that are separate from those<br />

<strong>for</strong> civilian weapons. This poses some special problems. Some arms<br />

manufacturers do not uniquely mark SALW <strong>and</strong>/or ammunition produced<br />

<strong>for</strong> the military, enabling the armed <strong>for</strong>ces to apply their own marks as these<br />

weapons enter into service. Large quantities <strong>of</strong> military SALW held in<br />

reserve storage may be unmarked or inadequately marked. When such<br />

weapons are subsequently diverted to the illicit market through loss, theft<br />

or corruption, they may be difficult or impossible to trace.<br />

Similarly, <strong>for</strong> institutional <strong>and</strong> national security reasons, most countries<br />

maintain separate records <strong>for</strong> arms, parts <strong>and</strong> components <strong>and</strong> ammunition<br />

held by their armed <strong>for</strong>ces. While such records are centralized <strong>and</strong><br />

computerized in numerous countries—including Australia, Canada, South<br />

Africa <strong>and</strong> the UK—many others lack centralized national records even in<br />

paper <strong>for</strong>m. In some States, different branches <strong>of</strong> the armed <strong>for</strong>ces maintain<br />

separate records <strong>of</strong> their SALW inventories, with no detailed central<br />

database. 40 Further complicating the picture, many countries also maintain<br />

several security <strong>for</strong>ces in addition to the military—such as border guards,<br />

interior troops, gendarmerie <strong>and</strong> special services—each with their own<br />

inventories. This kind <strong>of</strong> fragmentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial SALW records can hamper<br />

accurate record-keeping, prevent the timely identification <strong>of</strong> losses, <strong>and</strong><br />

obstruct or delay tracing investigations.<br />

While all well-organized pr<strong>of</strong>essional armed <strong>for</strong>ces have systems <strong>for</strong><br />

identifying <strong>and</strong> tracing losses <strong>of</strong> arms <strong>and</strong> ammunition from their own stocks<br />

<strong>and</strong> units, in many countries such systems are under-developed or underutilized.<br />

International military cooperation in tracing illicit weapons flows to<br />

conflict regions has grown in recent years. Thus, in the Balkans, NATO <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!