The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PREFACE<br />
<strong>The</strong> illegal proliferation <strong>of</strong> small arms <strong>and</strong> light weapons is a global<br />
crisis. One consequence <strong>of</strong> the illicit trade in weapons is that regions<br />
become flooded with small arms be<strong>for</strong>e, during <strong>and</strong> following a violent<br />
conflict. After a conflict, guns <strong>of</strong>ten stay in the region, kept <strong>for</strong> personal<br />
security or <strong>for</strong> use in violent crime <strong>and</strong> the death <strong>and</strong> injury rate from the<br />
guns can remain extremely high in post-conflict societies. Even if peace <strong>and</strong><br />
sustained development become rooted in a community <strong>and</strong> small arms <strong>and</strong><br />
light weapons are traded in <strong>for</strong> more useful commodities, arms dealers<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten sell them on to people embroiled in a conflict in another part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world. And so the vicious cycle begins again.<br />
Practical measures have been introduced in many post-conflict<br />
situations to collect <strong>and</strong> destroy weapons so that they cannot be sold on to<br />
fuel violence elsewhere. However, large surplus stockpiles exist in some<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the world, <strong>and</strong> new weapons are constantly being manufactured;<br />
many <strong>of</strong> these are diverted into the illegal markets, making their way into<br />
the h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> those who will use them to kill in conflict or in crime.<br />
<strong>The</strong> world may be awash with a surplus <strong>of</strong> illegal weapons <strong>and</strong><br />
although peacemakers may be draining hundreds <strong>of</strong> thous<strong>and</strong>s out through<br />
weapons collection <strong>and</strong> destruction programmes, the tap <strong>of</strong> illegal diversion<br />
is still flowing.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the problems is that we do not know where, when <strong>and</strong> how<br />
legally manufactured weapons are being introduced into the illicit trade in<br />
small arms. Weapons that are collected following conflicts <strong>of</strong>ten yield few<br />
clues by themselves as to how they arrived <strong>and</strong> from where they most<br />
recently came. States that legally manufacture <strong>and</strong> sell small arms <strong>and</strong> light<br />
weapons thus have a clear interest in preventing diversion into the illicit<br />
trade, since they are <strong>of</strong>ten otherwise identified as the likely proliferators.<br />
To prevent illicit diversion, one necessary (but not sufficient) measure<br />
is to mark weapons in an easily identifiable <strong>and</strong> coherent manner <strong>and</strong> to<br />
maintain databases <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> marked weapons <strong>and</strong> their legal<br />
transfers, so that any illegally diverted weapons can be traced back to the<br />
vii