08.07.2014 Views

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

13<br />

Regional Agreements<br />

<strong>The</strong> three regional agreements discussed in section 1.2.3 have similar<br />

provisions <strong>for</strong> marking. As in the UN Firearms Protocol, Article VI <strong>of</strong> the<br />

OAS Convention requires marking at the time <strong>of</strong> manufacture <strong>and</strong> import.<br />

Moreover, it requires, in addition to firearms, that “any other weapon or<br />

destructive device such as any explosive, incendiary or gas bomb, grenade,<br />

rocket launcher, missile, missile system or mine should be marked<br />

appropriately at the time <strong>of</strong> manufacture, if possible” (Article VI,<br />

paragraph 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> marking obligations <strong>of</strong> the SADC Protocol are quite similar to those<br />

<strong>of</strong> the UN Firearms protocol, though the number <strong>and</strong> location <strong>of</strong> marks are<br />

specified in greater detail. “States Parties undertake to establish agreed<br />

systems to ensure that all firearms are marked with a unique number, at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> manufacture or import, on the barrel, frame <strong>and</strong>, where applicable,<br />

the slide” (Article 9.1).<br />

<strong>The</strong> OSCE Document goes beyond the marking requirements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

UN Firearms Protocol, specifying that marks at the time <strong>of</strong> manufacture<br />

should permit identification <strong>of</strong> the year <strong>of</strong> manufacture. Along the same<br />

lines as the UN Programme <strong>of</strong> Action, OSCE States also committed<br />

themselves to ensure that “should any unmarked small arms be discovered<br />

in the course <strong>of</strong> the routine management <strong>of</strong> their current stockpiles, they<br />

will destroy them, or if those small arms are brought into service or<br />

exported, that they will mark them be<strong>for</strong>eh<strong>and</strong> with an identifying mark<br />

unique to each small arm” (Section II, B.2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> UN Programme <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>and</strong> the UN Firearms Protocol, taken<br />

together, establish a set <strong>of</strong> global minimum st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>for</strong> the marking <strong>of</strong><br />

SALW. However, these fall short <strong>of</strong> what is increasingly recognized as good<br />

practice. For example, the use <strong>of</strong> geometric symbols in identification<br />

marks—in addition to alphanumerics—makes international identification<br />

<strong>of</strong> such weapons <strong>and</strong> tracing cooperation more difficult. 22 Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

regional obligations noted above could usefully be adopted globally,<br />

including a commitment to destroy or appropriately mark any inadequately<br />

marked arms found in existing stockpiles. 23<br />

Other opportunities <strong>for</strong> improved international st<strong>and</strong>ards on marking<br />

exist in the following areas:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!