The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

152
There are several important elements in the manufacturer’s role that
have significant tracing implications. These include:
• what markings to use (serial number, e.g.);
• where to mark (frame or receiver, barrel, e.g.);
• how to mark (engraving, roll stamping, laser etching, e.g.);
• height and depth of the marking;
• language, alphabet, character or symbols used in the marking;
• correction system for duplicate or erroneous markings;
• record-keeping system (computerized, retention schedule);
• compliance with laws of other States where firearms are destined for
export.
In addition, it should be noted that the same issues are applicable
where the manufacturer is State-controlled or where such manufacture is a
function of the military. Moreover, where both systems coexist, there are
additional considerations, especially where the markings requirements vary
for military versus commercial manufacturer.
Clearly, any effective tracing system must have the full compliance of
manufacturers in putting proper and lasting markings upon all firearms.
Such markings should be user-friendly, legible, of sufficient height and
depth to resist obliteration, nonduplicative, easily recordable and
conspicuously located on a portion of the firearm. Subsequent transferees
of the firearm will use these markings as a starting point for all future
records, so it is imperative that they follow these minimum standards.
Another central player in an effective tracing system is the record
keeper, who may be the same as the manufacturer. Considerations in this
area include:
• what records are maintained (solely the serial number or other
identifying information such as make, model, date of manufacture or
transfer);
• how records are maintained (paper, computer database, backup
systems);
• how long records are maintained (10 years, 20 years, indefinitely); 8
• contingencies for collecting records when companies go out of
business;