08.07.2014 Views

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62<br />

According to the UN definition, tracing SALW entails tracing<br />

h<strong>and</strong>guns, as well as missile launchers, mortars <strong>and</strong> anti-aircraft guns. By<br />

consulting the various statistics <strong>and</strong> studies that have been compiled, it is<br />

possible to establish a list <strong>of</strong> the weapons most commonly used in criminal<br />

acts. Or, as we mentioned earlier <strong>and</strong> as Greco has also observed, 15 it is at<br />

least possible to establish a link between the types <strong>of</strong> weapons used to<br />

commit crimes <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences (whether or not they are expensive, or<br />

powerful) <strong>and</strong> the degree <strong>of</strong> organization <strong>of</strong> the criminal network involved<br />

(i.e. simple, as in the case <strong>of</strong> a single individual, or more complex).<br />

<strong>The</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e, tracing operations must primarily target those types <strong>of</strong> weapons<br />

that are primarily involved in criminal activities.<br />

Technical criteria can also help us to better identify the weapons to be<br />

included in the SALW category. Here, the definition given by Gallusser et<br />

al in the context <strong>of</strong> section 2.1 allows us to dispense with certain types <strong>of</strong><br />

weapons. Antipersonnel mines, tanks <strong>and</strong> mortars would thus be excluded<br />

from the SALW category in this context.<br />

Depending on the definition <strong>of</strong> weapons being used <strong>and</strong> the type <strong>of</strong><br />

crime being considered, the classification <strong>of</strong> the weapons changes. <strong>The</strong><br />

weapons involved differ according to the type <strong>of</strong> crime the experts decide<br />

to cover. It is obvious that trafficking in tanks or missile launchers is different<br />

from trafficking in h<strong>and</strong>guns; that there is a difference in the criminals<br />

involved in these cases is also obvious. One <strong>of</strong> the determining criteria is<br />

thus the link between a weapon <strong>and</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> crime <strong>for</strong> which that<br />

weapon might be used (this is the first category as shown in Figure 1).<br />

To close this chapter, an interesting question can be put <strong>for</strong>ward: is it<br />

SALW that define the tracing process, or is it the process that defines the<br />

weapons that are involved <strong>and</strong> which must there<strong>for</strong>e be traced? <strong>The</strong> answer<br />

to this question will provide pertinent in<strong>for</strong>mation with respect to the<br />

weapons that are lumped together under the very broad heading <strong>of</strong> SALW.<br />

2.6 WHICH SALW SHOULD BE THE SUBJECT OF A TRACING<br />

MECHANISM? WHY?<br />

We have already referred to the problem <strong>of</strong> unwittingly lumping all<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> weapons under the label <strong>of</strong> SALW. SALW undoubtedly must be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!