08.07.2014 Views

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9<br />

It is, in fact, important that marks cannot be easily obliterated, altered<br />

or removed. Those who hold <strong>and</strong> trade weapons, such as h<strong>and</strong>guns, <strong>for</strong><br />

criminal purposes have a strong interest in disguising their sources <strong>of</strong> (<strong>of</strong>ten<br />

legal) supply, particularly if they are sourced reasonably directly from a<br />

supplier such as a dishonest registered firearms dealer. Criminals will<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e try to remove or obliterate identifying marks, <strong>for</strong> example by<br />

grinding, drilling or gouging them away with metal working tools. Where<br />

successful, this process is known as “sanitization”. 14<br />

Attempts to sanitize illicit SALW have, to date, been less common in<br />

conflict zones, where there has been less likelihood <strong>of</strong> tracing attempts <strong>and</strong><br />

in any case the lines <strong>of</strong> supply are typically complex, with extensive recirculation<br />

among armed groups. Nevertheless, it appears that increased<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts to trace illicit arms in conflict zones have prompted an increase in<br />

sanitization ef<strong>for</strong>ts. 15<br />

It is there<strong>for</strong>e important to sustain, indeed intensify, ef<strong>for</strong>ts to make<br />

sanitization more difficult. For example, US regulations specify a minimum<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> 0.003 inches <strong>and</strong> a height <strong>of</strong> 1/16 th inch <strong>for</strong> all firearm serial<br />

numbers. Manufacturers can place marks in less visible or accessible<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the weapons, or on delicate but essential components that<br />

would be damaged by attempts to remove marks. Marks may also be<br />

stamped on two or more locations <strong>of</strong> the same component in order to<br />

facilitate the retrieval <strong>of</strong> erased in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

It is in this context that the concept <strong>of</strong> covert secondary marking has<br />

developed. This has been facilitated through the use <strong>of</strong> less traditional<br />

marking techniques, including laser etching, embedded electronic chips,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the mixing <strong>of</strong> chemical tracers in materials from which weapons parts<br />

are constructed. <strong>The</strong>se can be used to make “back-up” marks that may<br />

prove essential to the future identification <strong>of</strong> the weapon. Laser etching, <strong>for</strong><br />

example, can engrave detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation in an area so small it will usually<br />

escape the notice <strong>of</strong> those attempting to sanitize the weapon.<br />

Techniques also exist <strong>for</strong> marking ammunition <strong>and</strong> explosives.<br />

Cartridges (rounds) <strong>for</strong> small arms are generally marked by head stamping,<br />

although this in<strong>for</strong>mation generally identifies the batch, as opposed to<br />

individual rounds. Practices vary widely with more complex <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong><br />

ammunition, such as shells <strong>and</strong> missiles. Explosives can most easily be<br />

marked during manufacture with the use <strong>of</strong> chemical tracers, which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!