The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
The Scope and Implications of a Tracing Mechanism for Small Arms ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
72<br />
Table 5: H<strong>and</strong>gun registration according to case type 25<br />
Registered<br />
h<strong>and</strong>guns<br />
Unregistered<br />
h<strong>and</strong>guns<br />
Cases <strong>of</strong> a<br />
general nature<br />
%<br />
Cases <strong>of</strong><br />
weapons found<br />
%<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> case<br />
unknow<br />
%<br />
30.3 47.9 35.5<br />
69.7 52.1 64.5<br />
It is clear, then, that statistics can do much to help identify the weapons<br />
that are being traced. <strong>The</strong> BATF example highlights interesting examples in<br />
this respect. A study carried out by Kopel 26 has revealed that assault<br />
weapons were the most commonly traced because <strong>of</strong> their morphology,<br />
which is evocative <strong>of</strong> war <strong>and</strong> war crimes, as against traditional revolvers<br />
such as the Smith & Wesson, which are commonly found in any worthy<br />
collection.<br />
It is important to emphasize that the statistics <strong>of</strong> the BATF are not<br />
representative <strong>of</strong> weapon-related crime <strong>for</strong> several reasons. First, no<br />
weapons manufactured be<strong>for</strong>e 1990 are traced because <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong><br />
existing registers <strong>for</strong> these weapons. Moreover, the weapons that are traced<br />
are in fact traced not in the context <strong>of</strong> criminal investigations linked to<br />
serious crimes or <strong>of</strong>fences, but rather in the context <strong>of</strong> simple checks <strong>for</strong><br />
legal or illegal arms possession, <strong>for</strong> the most part.<br />
Let us recall that arms <strong>and</strong> ammunition manufacturers are free to make<br />
whatever marks they wish on their products as there are no st<strong>and</strong>ard rules<br />
governing this area. <strong>The</strong> experts there<strong>for</strong>e find themselves faced with (1)<br />
weapons that may have no marks, (2) weapons with duplicated numbers,<br />
or simply (3) weapons that are not registered. It is interesting to note that in<br />
Switzerl<strong>and</strong>, there is no national database to speak <strong>of</strong> which records all the<br />
weapons available on the market; this is an impediment to the data<br />
exchange necessary <strong>for</strong> the tracing process to work well. In this respect, the<br />
Swiss daily newspaper 24 heures (23-24 February 2002, p. 17) estimates<br />
that more than 420,000 Swiss citizens have a military weapon (such as the<br />
1990 assault rifle) in their homes, but giving a precise figure is a difficult task<br />
as there is no relevant centralized register. In this case, how can one