09.09.2014 Views

Co-experience: Understanding user experiences in social interaction

Co-experience: Understanding user experiences in social interaction

Co-experience: Understanding user experiences in social interaction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pittsburgh, PA, 2003. New York: ACM, pp.<br />

98–102.<br />

32. Kurv<strong>in</strong>en, E. & Kosk<strong>in</strong>en, I. (2003). Mobile<br />

Photo Album: An Experience Prototype. In<br />

Kosk<strong>in</strong>en, I., Battarbee, K. and Mattelmäki,<br />

T. (Eds.) Empathic Design. User Experience<br />

for Product Design. Hels<strong>in</strong>ki: IT Press, pp.<br />

93–103.<br />

33. Lehtonen, T.-K., Kosk<strong>in</strong>en, I. and Kurv<strong>in</strong>en,<br />

E. (2003). Mobile Digital Pictures<br />

– the Future of the Postcard. 9th Interdiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

<strong>Co</strong>nference on Research <strong>in</strong> <strong>Co</strong>nsumption.<br />

Dept. of Design History/Material<br />

Culture, University of Applied Arts,<br />

Vienna, Austria, June 27–29, 2003.<br />

34. Leonard, D. & Rayport, J.F. (1997). Spark<br />

Innovation through Empathic Design.<br />

Harvard Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, Nov–Dec, pp.<br />

102–113.<br />

35. Licoppe, C. and Heurt<strong>in</strong>, J.P. (2001). Manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

One’s Availability to Telephone<br />

<strong>Co</strong>mmunication Through Mobile Phones:<br />

A French Study of the Development Dynamics<br />

of Mobile Phone Use. Personal<br />

and Ubiquitous <strong>Co</strong>mput<strong>in</strong>g 5(2), pp. 99–<br />

108.<br />

36. Mauss, M. (1980). The Gift: Forms and<br />

Functions of Exchange <strong>in</strong> Archaic Societies.<br />

London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.<br />

37. Mäkelä, A. and Battarbee, K. (1999.) It’s<br />

Fun to Do Th<strong>in</strong>gs Together. Two Cases of<br />

Explorative User Studies. Personal Technologies<br />

3, (1999), pp. 137–140.<br />

38. Mäkelä, A. & Fulton Suri, J. (2001). Support<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Users’ Creativity: Design to Induce<br />

Pleasurable Experiences. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

of the International <strong>Co</strong>nference on<br />

Affective Human Factors Design 27–29<br />

June 2001, S<strong>in</strong>gapore: Asean Academic<br />

Press, pp. 387–394.<br />

39. Mäkelä, A., V. Giller, M. Tscheligi, and R.<br />

Sefel<strong>in</strong> (2000). Jok<strong>in</strong>g, Storytell<strong>in</strong>g, Artshar<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

Express<strong>in</strong>g Affection: A Field Trial<br />

of How Children and their Social Network<br />

<strong>Co</strong>mmunicate with Digital Images<br />

<strong>in</strong> Leisure Time. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of CHI’2000.<br />

ACM Press, pp. 548–555.<br />

40. Neisser, U. (1981). John Dean’s Memory: A<br />

Case Study. <strong>Co</strong>gnition 9(1), pp. 1–22.<br />

41. Orr, J.E. (1996) Talk<strong>in</strong>g about Mach<strong>in</strong>es:<br />

An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca:<br />

<strong>Co</strong>rnell University Press.<br />

42. Picard, R. (1997). Affective <strong>Co</strong>mput<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<br />

43. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agree<strong>in</strong>g and Disagree<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with Assessments: Some Features<br />

of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes. In<br />

Atk<strong>in</strong>son, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures<br />

of Social Action. Studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>Co</strong>nversation<br />

Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press.<br />

44. Rhea, D. K. (1992). A New Perspective on<br />

Design. Focus<strong>in</strong>g on Customer Experience.<br />

In: Design Management Journal<br />

(Fall): 40–48.<br />

45. Sanders, L. (2002) <strong>Co</strong>llective Creativity.<br />

In LOOP: The AIGA Journal of Interaction<br />

Design Education, ed. 3. Accessed July<br />

15, 2003 at http://loop.aiga.org/content.<br />

cfm?Alias=sandersucd<br />

46. Sanders, E. B-N. (2003). Design for experienc<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Scaffolds <strong>in</strong> communicational<br />

spaces. Design for <strong>Co</strong>mmunicational<br />

Spaces <strong>Co</strong>nference proceed<strong>in</strong>gs: accessed<br />

19th January 2004 at http://www.ualberta.ca/COMSPACE/coneng/html/papers/<br />

Sanders.doc<br />

47. Scott, M.B. & Lyman, S.M. (1968). Accounts.<br />

American Sociological Review<br />

33(1), pp. 46–62.<br />

48. Seale, C. (1999). The Quality of Qualitative<br />

Data. London: Sage.<br />

49. Segal, L. D. & Fulton Suri, J. (1997). The<br />

Empathic Practitioner. Measurement and<br />

Interpretation of User Experience. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

of the 41st Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,<br />

New Mexico, Sept. 22–26.<br />

50. Shedroff, N. (1991). Experience Design 1.<br />

Indianapolis: New Riders Publish<strong>in</strong>g..<br />

51. Shott, S. (1979). Emotion and Social Life:<br />

A Symbolic Interactionist Analysis. American<br />

Journal of Sociology 84, pp.1317–<br />

1334.<br />

ARTICLE 4 153

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!