26.01.2015 Views

Department of Defence Annual Report 2008-2009

Department of Defence Annual Report 2008-2009

Department of Defence Annual Report 2008-2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

| <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defence</strong> |<br />

| Programme 3: Air <strong>Defence</strong> |<br />

improve growth. The number <strong>of</strong> MSDS in service<br />

in the Air Force increased from 893 to 1 100, with a<br />

race representation <strong>of</strong> 90.3% black and 9.7% white,<br />

and gender distribution <strong>of</strong> 29.5% women and 70.5%<br />

men.<br />

The Reserves made a valuable contribution towards<br />

achieving the Air Force’s objectives. The shortage<br />

<strong>of</strong> skilled personnel, caused by poor retention <strong>of</strong><br />

personnel, was <strong>of</strong>fset to a certain extent by the use <strong>of</strong><br />

Reserve pilots including the command and control<br />

environment. In total 635 Reserve Force members<br />

generated 91 625 man-days for the year. In addition<br />

to the continuation <strong>of</strong> training <strong>of</strong> Air Force Reserve<br />

Squadrons, 40 Reservists attended courses which<br />

included basic military training, personnel courses,<br />

skills training and developmental courses.<br />

Measures to improve asset management included the<br />

annual Supply Support evaluation <strong>of</strong> units, which<br />

showed an average compliance rate <strong>of</strong> 82.75%.<br />

The Auditor-General identied two units whose<br />

asset management practices were below standard.<br />

The self-accounting status <strong>of</strong> these units will be<br />

withdrawn and they will become ledger units <strong>of</strong><br />

other self-accounting units. Downsizing <strong>of</strong> the Air<br />

Force’s inventory progressed during the year with<br />

the present number <strong>of</strong> ledgers on various systems at<br />

415 907 compared to 1 360 000 at the beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

the downsizing process.<br />

The main runway upgrade <strong>of</strong> AFB Waterklo<strong>of</strong> has<br />

progressed well and the expected completion date<br />

for the rst phase is the end <strong>of</strong> June <strong>2009</strong>. Owing<br />

to inadequate funding <strong>of</strong> facility maintenance<br />

and other issues between the DOD and the<br />

National <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Public Works (NDPW),<br />

Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) issues<br />

(e.g. delegations and appointment <strong>of</strong> contractors),<br />

remained unresolved throughout the year.<br />

The deterioration <strong>of</strong> facilities remains a major<br />

concern. Problems with facilities in dolomite areas<br />

led to the relocation <strong>of</strong> the Air Force Gymnasium<br />

to AFB Hoedspruit, to accommodate the Military<br />

Skills Development System (MSDS) basic training.<br />

Rehabilitation is in progress at the Air Force College,<br />

while the future <strong>of</strong> 68 Air School is still undecided.<br />

The possible relocation <strong>of</strong> AFB Durban to La Mercy<br />

requires urgent attention, to ensure continuity in<br />

operational air capabilities in KwaZulu-Natal and<br />

adjacent areas.<br />

Some critical skills are no longer readily available in<br />

the Air Force and need to be acquired from industry<br />

at exorbitant cost. To counter the loss <strong>of</strong> personnel,<br />

however, increased numbers <strong>of</strong> technicians are<br />

being trained, and high-level negotiations with role<br />

players in the aviation industry have been initiated to<br />

address a joint human resources strategy for training<br />

and the utilisation <strong>of</strong> scarce human resources.<br />

The prolonged underfunding has caused an erosion<br />

<strong>of</strong> air weapon-system integration, which has created<br />

“bow waves”. These have not been resolvable<br />

within present budget allocations and have led to<br />

sustainability issues. Ageing systems and the lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> funding for spares to repair these systems are in<br />

some cases aggravated by obsolescence to the extent<br />

that they are no longer supported by industry. The<br />

Air Force was not funded to operate the Strategic<br />

<strong>Defence</strong> Package aircraft at the intended rates. The<br />

contract, project and warranty-cover afforded the<br />

Hawk and Gripen Systems to date is rapidly coming<br />

to an end and available funds are insufcient to<br />

contract effectively in-service logistics support. To<br />

address this shortfall only ad hoc contracts can be<br />

entered into, which seriously impacted on aircraft<br />

availability. The underfunding also impacted<br />

on force preparation, to the extent that some<br />

competencies <strong>of</strong> air-and-ground crews were lost,<br />

resulting in specic capabilities not being available<br />

anymore. The funding <strong>of</strong> incentives from the<br />

operating budget at the expense <strong>of</strong> operating output<br />

also remains unresolved. To mitigate the impact,<br />

the Air Force has introduced various initiatives to<br />

improve affordability and efciency, for example<br />

,the introduction <strong>of</strong> an economical side-by-side<br />

basic ying trainer and the increased utilisation <strong>of</strong><br />

Reserves. The Air Force is also at present reviewing<br />

its force design and force structure to improve<br />

sustainability.<br />

Notwithstanding the challenges experienced during<br />

the past year, the Air Force was to a large extent still<br />

able to meet its ordered commitments and required<br />

combat-readiness levels. This can be attributed to<br />

the dedication and commitment <strong>of</strong> its personnel.<br />

It enabled the Air Force to achieve 73% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

planned readiness <strong>of</strong> aircraft and aircrew availability<br />

and to y 94.6% <strong>of</strong> the planned ying hours. In<br />

most cases where targets were not met, it could be<br />

attributed to a shortage <strong>of</strong> aircrew and experienced<br />

technicians, low-aircraft availability due to long lead<br />

times on spares, and protracted under-funding <strong>of</strong><br />

capabilities.<br />

The skills losses continued unabated, and resulted in<br />

a decrease in experience levels within the Air Force.<br />

Considerable progress was, however, made in areas<br />

such as human resource transformation and the<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> FY <strong>2008</strong> - <strong>2009</strong><br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!