26.01.2015 Views

Department of Defence Annual Report 2008-2009

Department of Defence Annual Report 2008-2009

Department of Defence Annual Report 2008-2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

| <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Defence</strong> | Vote 19 |<br />

REPORT OF THE AUDITOR-GENERAL TO PARLIAMENT<br />

ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND PERFORMANCE<br />

INFORMATION OF VOTE NO.19: DEPARTMENT OF<br />

DEFENCE for the year ended 31 March <strong>2009</strong> (continued)<br />

Non-compliance with applicable legislation<br />

Public Finance Management Act<br />

18. The accounting <strong>of</strong>cer did not comply with Section 38(1)(g) <strong>of</strong> the PFMA: reporting in writing to the<br />

National Treasury particulars <strong>of</strong> discovered irregular expenditure.<br />

Governance framework<br />

19. The governance principles that impact the auditor’s opinion on the nancial statements are related to<br />

the responsibilities and practices exercised by the accounting <strong>of</strong>cer and executive management and<br />

are reected in the internal control deciencies and key governance responsibilities addressed below:<br />

| Financial Performance |<br />

Internal control deciencies<br />

20. Section 38(1)(a)(i) <strong>of</strong> the PFMA states that the accounting <strong>of</strong>cer must ensure that the department<br />

has and maintains effective, efcient and transparent systems <strong>of</strong> nancial and risk management and<br />

internal control. The table below depicts the root causes that gave rise to the deciencies in the system<br />

<strong>of</strong> internal control, which led to the qualied opinion. The root causes are categorised according to<br />

the ve components <strong>of</strong> an effective system <strong>of</strong> internal control. (The number listed per component<br />

can be followed with the legend below the table.) In some instances deciencies exist in more than one<br />

internal control component.<br />

Par. no. Basis for qualied opinion CE RA CA IC M<br />

7. Tangible and intangible assets 1 1<br />

8. Lease commitments 2 3,5 1 1<br />

9. Irregular Expenditure 1 3 1 3<br />

10. Goods and services: consultant expenditure 3,5,6 3 1<br />

11. <strong>Department</strong>al revenue: other sales 1 1<br />

12. Corresponding gure: accruals 3<br />

Conclusion on the governance framework<br />

21. The above-mentioned were mainly due to the following:<br />

Insufcient monitoring controls and oversight by senior management over the preparation and<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> nancial statements, with specic reference to the reviewing and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

supporting documentation and gures.<br />

Insufcient guidance/procedures provided to staff regarding the preparation <strong>of</strong> nancial<br />

statements.<br />

Legend<br />

CE = Control environment<br />

The organisational structure does not address areas <strong>of</strong> responsibility and lines <strong>of</strong> reporting to support effective<br />

control over nancial reporting.<br />

1<br />

<strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong> FY <strong>2008</strong> - <strong>2009</strong> 240

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!