Dictionary of Evidence-based Medicine.pdf
Dictionary of Evidence-based Medicine.pdf
Dictionary of Evidence-based Medicine.pdf
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Dictionary</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Evidence</strong>-<strong>based</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong> 143<br />
Risk difference (see under Risk)<br />
Risk ratio (see under Risk)<br />
Risk reduction<br />
In assessing and attributing risk, it is best to express the risk relative to a<br />
control (see under Risk). For example, in estimating by how much an antibiotic<br />
reduces the risk <strong>of</strong> traveller's diarrhoea, we could observe 100 patients<br />
receiving it and report how many (say five) develop diarrhoea. The<br />
estimate <strong>of</strong> absolute risk <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea would be 5/100 or 0.05. This figure,<br />
however, does not tell us by how much the antibiotic has reduced the incidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> diarrhoea. To do this, we may study a control group <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
given a placebo to obtain another estimate <strong>of</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> diarrhoea for this<br />
group <strong>of</strong> patients (say 10/100 or 0.1). The difference in the two rates (0.05)<br />
gives us an estimate <strong>of</strong> the risk reduction in absolute terms. For this reason<br />
this value is called the absolute risk reduction (ARR). On average, five<br />
fewer patients out <strong>of</strong> 100 treated would develop diarrhoea than if they<br />
received a placebo.<br />
The reciprocal <strong>of</strong> the risk reduction gives us the number needed to treat<br />
(see NNT), 20 in this instance. The NNT tells us that on average 20 patients<br />
need to be given antibiotics for one more patient to be protected from<br />
diarrhoea when compared to placebo.<br />
The risk reduction may also be expressed as a proportion or percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the risk in the control group to produce a relative risk reduction (RRR),<br />
expressed as a proportion or percentage. In the above example, the relative<br />
risk reduction is given by (0.1 - 0.05)/0.10 or 0.5. Expressed as a percentage<br />
the RRR is 50%. This appears more impressive than the ARR <strong>of</strong> 0.05 or 5%.<br />
It is worth noting that, perhaps confusingly, both the absolute and the<br />
relative risk reduction terms are relative to a control group. The terms used<br />
refer to how the values are expressed. The RRR is as a proportion or percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the control rate or risk while the ARR is on its own.<br />
Root mean square error<br />
The root mean square error (RMSE) is an estimate <strong>of</strong> the standard deviation<br />
associated with experimental error. For a sample <strong>of</strong> n observations<br />
x v x x ,...,x n , the root mean square error or standard deviation is defined as: